Originally posted by abhilegend
It was a long fight with casualties on both side. Zeus did not fight Steppenwolf alone.And Thor never beat Aether powered Malekith. It was mighty Jane Foster.
Steppenwolf was driven back by Zeus' lightning and an axe to the shoulder. Thor is a god of thunder with far better feats and a way more powerful weapon....He was beaten by Thor's most basic combo attack. A tiny ass lighting stream at that, the bolt that hit Hela was the size of Asgard's palace and he can spam them.
This is a spite thread tbh.
No, but he did damage it, and fought him evenly. Compared to the Motherbox, the Aether is infinitely more powerful so mentioning that as a feat for Zeus is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Steppenwolf was driven back by Zeus' lightning and an axe to the shoulder. Thor is a god of thunder with far better feats and a way more powerful weapon....He was beaten by Thor's most basic combo attack. A tiny ass lighting stream at that, the bolt that hit Hela was the size of Asgard's palace and he can spam them.
😂
Are you seriously suggesting that the size of the lightning suggests what's powerful?
Just because it was lightning doesn't mean Thor can do it.
This is a spite thread tbh.
When Thor can beat villains in his own movie, maybe you should start suggesting he can beat a team villain.
No, but he did damage it, and fought him evenly. Compared to the Motherbox, the Aether is infinitely more powerful so mentioning that as a feat for Zeus is irrelevant.
He only shattered the crystals. How's Aether more powerful than mother boxes?
Originally posted by abhilegend
😂Are you seriously suggesting that the size of the lightning suggests what's powerful?
Just because it was lightning doesn't mean Thor can do it.
When Thor can beat villains in his own movie, maybe you should start suggesting he can beat a team villain.
He only shattered the crystals. How's Aether more powerful than mother boxes?
Why should the motherboxes be more powerful than the Aether? 😂
Superman and the Justice League who sometimes help isn't better than any Avengers movie. Firstly they just gathered the entire League in a few minutes. Aside from Superman who got 2, only Wonder Woman even got her own movie. So they shoehorned Batman into 2 storylines, Cyborg, Aquaman, and Flash all to do an "Avengers" type movie without the buildup.
And then the League were basically a stalling tactic until Superman returned, again. What's the point in having a massive team when all of them are basically worthless until the poster boy shows up? They could've just waited for Clark to come back and kept their costumes shiny for the photo-op.
Although it's unexpected.
Justice League did better than Avangers 2.
Avangers 2 was a "failure" for marvel.
Not that the movie itself it's a failure/bad but that IT WAS WAY BELOW WHAT WAS EXPECTED.
Age of Ultron was bad in comparsion to it's first movie!
In contrast Justice League was an unexpected success for DC.
The movie is MAGNIFICENT in comparison to the other Failures of DCEU!
So having said that, Age of Ultron is terrible whilst JL is great in their own Universes.
Now yes, JL had it's bad sides but overall it was a great movie considering DCEU's standards!
I would definetly put JL above Age of Ultron.
Not good enough to go against the big MCU's success that's for sure.
What kind of idiocy is that? I'm sorry man but that's just dumb.
Even if AoU was lower than what Marvel usually prides itself on, it was still one of the biggest sellers of the year and biggest movies of it's kind, period. It had a great plot, great action, great characters with fleshed out histories and motivations, etc...
Justice League literally slapped a bunch of people on a movie and rushed it to the end so Superman could come back. And just how AoU was lower than Marvel wanted, but still amazing. JL was better than DC wanted, but is still not great.