Originally posted by Silent Master
But if it's so good then word of mouth should have resulted in an increase in ticket sells. are you saying it's second weekend will be higher than AOU's?
Justice league was released 4 days ago..Not even a week.
Maybe.
AoU was expected to be a great movie, obviously had more fans eager to go an check it out.
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderThey are saying the same thing I am. Mediocre to decent at times and decent action sequences but nothing resembling greatness. It hasn't failed yet but the opening weekend was beyond their wildest nightmares.
Lets wait and see.News are spreading of it being a good movie.
It's too soon to call it an economic failure.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They are saying the same thing I am. Mediocre to decent at times and decent action sequences but nothing resembling greatness. It hasn't failed yet but the opening weekend was beyond their wildest nightmares.
agree.
Yet a good movie compared to it's predecessors.
And still better to AoU which is bad compared to it's predecessors.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Age of Ultron wasn't one of their best films but still better than Justice League. Avengers 1 was great.
Yeah Overall I agree.
I just hope Infinity War doesn't disappoints the way AoU did.
I hope MCU doesn't make Thanos a joke like theyve done with many other villains...
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderDifferent directors. Whedon can't be trusted with a serious villain. Ultron worked but if he tried that quirky nonsense on Thanos I'd assault him. Russos are the men I trust with Lord Thanos.
Yeah Overall I agree.I just hope Infinity War doesn't disappoints the way AoU did.
I hope MCU doesn't make Thanos a joke like theyve done with many other villains...
Originally posted by quanchi112
Different directors. Whedon can't be trusted with a serious villain. Ultron worked but if he tried that quirky nonsense on Thanos I'd assault him. Russos are the men I trust with Lord Thanos.
I hope so.
They even claim Thanos would be the "Darth Vader" of this decade.
Hela wasn't that good neither. She was....Good but they didn't focus her that much. They could have made a better villain of her.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I loved what they did with Hela. Thanos is the grandest villain and it's all built up to this film. Tread carefully he's going to make the heavens run red with blood.
Hela was great, but she didn't had enough time on screen to make her a magnificent one.
Lucky remains #1 villain till now.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Different directors. Whedon can't be trusted with a serious villain. Ultron worked but if he tried that quirky nonsense on Thanos I'd assault him. Russos are the men I trust with Lord Thanos.
Saying Whedon can't be trusted with a serous villain proves you're bias. I bet you only know Whedon from Avengers, nothing else. Go back and watch is Buffy/Angel, Dollhouse, Firefly written and directed by him. Then come back and say that crap.
Tell me, where we're you to bash Whedon when he was directing Avengers and AOU? I bet you were in a corner jacking off about how good of a director Whedon was.
The only reason you're saying this crap, is because Whedon is no longer part of the MCU.
Whedon overall is 10x better a director and writer than the Russo brothers.
Want to prove me wrong? Name me one thing they've written and directed that can come close to most of the episode Whedon direct in both Buffy/Angel.
Originally posted by SquallXI didn't give one rats ass about Buffy and we are talking comic book films. I said after AOU I was happy he wasn't handling Thanos. Russos are much better suited for a darker film than Whedon was. Avengers 1 was great but I expect something darker for when Thanos comes to town and film wise I don't have the same trust in him to get the job done as I would with the Russos.
Saying Whedon can't be trusted with a serous villain proves you're bias. I bet you only know Whedon from Avengers, nothing else. Go back and watch is Buffy/Angel, Dollhouse, Firefly written and directed by him. Then come back and say that crap.Tell me, where we're you to bash Whedon when he was directing Avengers and AOU? I bet you were in a corner jacking off about how good of a director Whedon was.
The only reason you're saying this crap, is because Whedon is no longer part of the MCU.
Whedon overall is 10x better a director and writer than the Russo brothers.
Want to prove me wrong? Name me one thing they've written and directed that can come close to most of the episode Whedon direct in both Buffy/Angel.
Look you're upset the Justice League was a disaster I get that. That can't be thrown onto Whedon here as he was brought in to save the film. I said this years ago by the way.
I disagree 100 percent on your take on him over the Russos. Winter Soldier and Civil War were both great films. The action seen in Civil War is the stuff of legends. **** Buffy and Angel, loser.
😂
Give me the Russos. I'm getting them and we will see how it turns out.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
For Thor it definitely does based on Ragnarok and we saw what power minor strikes of his can do.
Beat random fodder? Slightly shake up Hulk? Have no effect on Hela?
No, Thor will do far better because he has actual feats that are far superior.
Like?
He shattered the Aether, a random unquantifiable feat that resulted in a large explosion due to the separation. Sound familiar? Like Zeus and the Motherboxes except far more powerful. The Aether is Universal in power, infinitely superior to the Motherboxes.
Except it was said that the mother boxes had a huge blowback in case of separation and it needed both Supermen and Cyborg to do it. There was no such scene regarding Aether.
Aether was no universal power, it's power was amped through the convergence of the nine realms.