Terrorist attack in NYC, explosion detonates near Times Square

Started by Robtard5 pages
Robtard Senor Member

^

Wtf are you talking about, it's like you invented an argument I didn't make and then attacked that. How edge.

DarthSkywalker0 The Insane Jedi Master

Originally posted by Robtard
^

Wtf are you talking about, it's like you invented an argument I didn't make and then attacked that. How edge.

Your quotes and comments on this subject indicate that you believe criticism of type that I am espousing towards Islam is bigotry. But facts are not bigotted.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
Your quotes and comments on this subject indicate that you believe criticism of type that I am espousing towards Islam is bigotry. But facts are not bigotted.

Are you flipping over "my cousin Akayed" comment? Funny, if so.

Criticize Islam all you like, I don't care. Contrary to what some retards think, I am not a Muslim. Just be fair/balanced with it.

Emperordmb LSDMB

I think if anything people view you as one of those western progressive Muslim apologists rather than an actual Muslim.

DarthSkywalker0 The Insane Jedi Master

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you flipping over "my cousin Akayed" comment? Funny, if so.

Criticize Islam all you like, I don't care. Contrary to what some retards think, I am not a Muslim. Just be fair/balanced with it.

As DMB says, I view you as an apologist.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by Emperordmb
I think if anything people view you as one of those western progressive Muslim apologists rather than an actual Muslim.

Being fair/balanced in regards to criticism is not an apologist 👆

ps I think Muhammed was a pedo, I've said this for years in here. That's not really an "Islam apologist" stance 👆

Rockydonovang freedom fighter

Originally posted by Bentley
Literalism

What is that?

Rockydonovang freedom fighter

Originally posted by Robtard
Your hatred, bigotry and rage are palpable, guy. Work on that, or it will eat you from the inside.

That's not hatred or bigotry. At worst, he misunderstood the context you were using the term "proper" in. In the context of Squall's reply, "proper" would refer to members who most 'properly' follow an ideology. That would be those who follow all of what their text dictates rather than cherrypick certain parts and disregard others. A 'proper' supporter of an ideaology fully supports said idealogy.

Off course, proper, doesn't always mean good, but Squall is right, Muslims who only support part of islam aren't as 'proper' in their support of islam as muslims who support the bad and good parts of the text.

Bentley Seitei
Originally posted by Rockydonovang
What is that?

The idea that a specific book is to be taken at face value to be interpreted correctly. A quick reminder of how unhistorical literalism is would be to point out history was invented and applied very late in human history.