Hercules Vs Gladiator

Originally posted by DarkSaint85

JBL is a big gladiator fan. he doesnt go into the formula Lol

Originally posted by abhilegend
That's why Brock Lesnar is so unsuccessful in UFC. Or Hulk in comics.

Oh wait.

Strength trumps skill 9/10 times in comics or real life.

lmao what in the ****......

i dont think you know anything about mma man 😆 😆

brock loses to more skilled fighters like cain, overeem and he lost to a washed up frank mir due to lack of skill... only reason he was champ was because how shallow the heavyweight division was at the time.... i agree with the comic thing though

Originally posted by ghostman
i agree with the comic thing though

yes but only when there is a big strength gap that doesnt allow skills to overcome. even when there is a gap, like the fight between savage hulk and colossus, look how well colossus used his skills to fight hulk off. or if we look at captain america vs lower superhuman strength opponents. now when we take gladiator and hercules, i dont believe that even if ther is a gap, that its one that overcomes skills. specially when we take into account how he went against thor physically.

You mean how he choked Jane Thor out?

Originally posted by abhilegend
You mean how he choked Jane Thor out?

No... i mean how he choked thor thor....

Jane just stalemated Hercules in arm wrestling.

Gladiator.

Hercules

I thought gladiator trained all his young life and even got trained by deathbird even further. Skill won't save Hercules and the strength difference is bigger than people think. Gladiator wins.

Originally posted by abhilegend
You mean how he choked Jane Thor out?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Jane just stalemated Hercules in arm wrestling.

Are you arguing that Gladiator is stronger than Thor and Hercules?

He grabbed her and then they teleported out imo. Has anyone asked Aaron on his take? I'm curious what interpretation he intended.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Are you arguing that Gladiator is stronger than Thor and Hercules?

You mean, what was directly shown?

Originally posted by panthergod
You mean, what was directly shown?

You believe that the scene was a direct showing of strength inferiority?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You believe that the scene was a direct showing of strength inferiority?

This has nothing to do with 'belief".

Originally posted by panthergod
This has nothing to do with 'belief".

Lol what? Jelly, there's like 500 pages on ICT full of your posts that say otherwise.

You want to talk facts? Okay. Gladiator is not stronger than classic Thor. Fact.

Thor is the closest measuring stick between Gladiator and Hercules. Their strength would be so closely tied together any difference would not be noticeable. As a matter of fact, 616 Gladiator and Masterson Thor were direct equals in strength. Masterson Thor is not as strong as Thor.

I don't really care how Jane Thor fits into all this but I believe based on the available evidence that Jason Aaron would have her a match for Thor in most circumstances.

Actually, it was stated several times that masterson Thor had all of thors strength and power and in that fight, Gladiator told M. Thor that he was far superior to thor in strength. Look at the scene where gladiator lifts masterson.

I don't understand why that scene is being seen as a positive for Jane? It looked like she was actually losing momentum against Herc, so she had to shock him to get back to even. Thor and Hercules have never moved the other an inch in direct strength comparisons. It actually put Jane into a nice little grey zone below Thors strength.

Yeah wtf.

It's because Herc says she tested him far more than Odinson ever did, or words to that effect.

He *COULD* have said that just to piss Odinson off, though.

Hercules has a history of talking shit against Thor

And since there's not only no evidence, but counter evidence, in that little arm wrestling match that Jane did better than Thor ever has, it can be safely taken as more shit talk against Thor.