God-Emperor Sheev Wankatine (Azronger) vs Godmaster Luke Skystomper (The Ellimist)

Started by Azronger5 pages
Originally posted by AncientPower
You're welcome, Az.

Your unwitting contributions to Sheevism continue to be deliciously ironic. It's clear to me that no matter what one does, Sheev benefits from it in one way or another. His Imperial Majesty's influence is omnipresent.

Seems like a very interesting argument, I'm on the fence personally, though I would assume unrestrained dark side Luke could probably pull it off, that's just a gut feeling though, and I expect the continuing debate to be informal for myself.

On the note of lightsabers, I've got a few humble thoughts:

1. That's assuming Sheev even indulges Luke with a lightsaber duel. If he's all out and not feeling like toying around with that "Jedi weapon", I doubt he'd even pull one out, unless himself and Luke were absolutely stalemated.

2. For people of this force power level and mastery, years of not fighting doesn't seem to really mean anything. Sheev didn't fight properly or practice for a decade and blitzed three Jedi swordmasters before Windu could even ****ing react. Plus, his accolades in dueling are extremely impressive. A master of all weapons, styles and is ambidextrous. He never goes a millimeter out of position with his saber.

In DE, he disarms Luke in a very short duel after just transferring to a fresh clone body.

I was propping up Sidious since before Bane wank was at its peak. It's adorable that you think you're that important though.

Originally posted by samappo
Seems like a very interesting argument, I'm on the fence personally, though I would assume unrestrained dark side Luke could probably pull it off, that's just a gut feeling though, and I expect the continuing debate to be informal for myself.

On the note of lightsabers, I've got a few humble thoughts:

1. That's assuming Sheev even indulges Luke with a lightsaber duel. If he's all out and not feeling like toying around with that "Jedi weapon", I doubt he'd even pull one out, unless himself and Luke were absolutely stalemated.

2. For people of this force power level and mastery, years of not fighting doesn't seem to really mean anything. Sheev didn't fight properly or practice for a decade and blitzed three Jedi swordmasters before Windu could even ****ing react. Plus, his accolades in dueling are extremely impressive. A master of all weapons, styles and is ambidextrous. He never goes a millimeter out of position with his saber.

In DE, he disarms Luke in a very short duel after just transferring to a fresh clone body.

This debate is between me and Ellimist. Don't interfere.

Just saying xD

Originally posted by AncientPower
I was propping up Sidious since before Bane wank was at its peak. It's adorable that you think you're that important though.

Yeah, yeah, you have absolute monopoly over Legends characters, as well as decades of experience debating them. In other words, we are supposed to take you seriously.

Hey, Az, not right now, but just "in case" the debate doesn't reach its conclusion, could I take over? I don't think I have ever debated you on anything seriously.

If Ell's fine with that, sure.

Just a legit question, does DE Sidious have shatterpoint? Since he's a master of all known Jedi techniques, wouldn't put it beyond him to know it, even though he's not confirmed as having it [except in the new canon, he's the only person who has it so far lmao].

PS Not saying that shatterpoint is a Jedi technique.

Originally posted by LordOfTheLight
Yeah, yeah, you have absolute monopoly over Legends characters, as well as decades of experience debating them. In other words, we are supposed to take you seriously.

I don't have a monopoly on anything. Though that's ironic considering you're defending a guy 'appointed' by Tempest to take over Sheevism.

But no, Az is actually woefully poor at Sheev wank.

Don't pollute my thread AP. Take the shitposting elsewhere

Originally posted by samappo
Just a legit question, does DE Sidious have shatterpoint? Since he's a master of all known Jedi techniques, wouldn't put it beyond him to know it, even though he's not confirmed as having it [except in the new canon, he's the only person who has it so far lmao].

PS Not saying that shatterpoint is a Jedi technique.

He's also confirmed to have learned all the greatest dark side techniques and every aspect of the Force in all its guises from over a million worlds from thousands of different cults including the Jedi Order, the Banite Sith and the Blackguard, the latter two having been hunting for Force knowledge all over the galaxy for a millenium, and the former having one of the two largest libraries in the galaxy containing info on the Force dating back 25 millenia that he had full access to as Emperor, not to mention the amount of different Force powers credited to him being "almost unlimited," on top of the rumor of him inventing new ones on a whim.

I'd say the chances of him not knowing Shatterpoint are very low.

Originally posted by Azronger
All you have here is pretty much speculation. Yes, you might think it is "intuitive," "fairly reasonable" and "safe to say" that Luke unlocked more of his potential and surpassed Sidious on his own, but "I think" is not evidence. I could just as well play the same game and retort that it [b]isn't a reasonable assertion (I'm not actually making that claim for the record, so don't try to shift the burden of proof on me; I was just demonstrating how inneffective your current argument is). Provide substantial proof for your case; claims made without evidence can be dismissed wihout evidence.

Outside of circumstantial showings, what does Luke have to top Sheev? Sheev already absolutely curbstomped Luke in their first fight, and has feats like matching evenly with Yoda and an amped Mace Windu, canonically the two best Jedi duelists ever up to that point in history, only behind Anakin. I haven't seen anything from Vader or Caedus or anyone else Luke fought that'd suggest they're up to par with the guys Palpatine squared off against.

Wasn't gonna go for nut shots; don't worry.

How big were the dovin basals and Bast Castle? Unless you give me a specific size, those feats are unquantifiable. Same with Caedus - provide proof for why ragdolling that guy is impressive. Until then, I'm not seeing how any of them match up to telekinetically manipulating a nineteen-kilometer-long Super Star Destroyer (while also multitasking with other Force powers which I may get into later depending on how this debate goes):

Years before, one of a number of Super Star Destroyers commissioned by the Emperor had disappeared. In fact, as a demonstration of Palpatine's dark side powers, he had buried the Lusankya at the edge of Imperial City.

The Official Star Wars Fact File #9

Once completed, the Emperor himself used the dark side of the Force to hide the Lusankya beneath the surface of Coruscant's cityscape.

An Expanded Universe Starship from Enemy Lines II: Rebel Stand (Book 12 of Star Wars: The New Jedi Order)

Q: In the Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide, under the Sith Battleship description it states that Exar Kun recovered his ship the ‘Corsair’ in the same way Darth Nihilus recovered the ‘Ravager’ on Malachor V. Does this mean that Exar Kun summoned the ship via the Force from the depths of the Massassi Temple of Sacrifice?

Peña: That said, looking over the text, it appears to me that a direct analogy with the Ravager and that your interpretation is essentially correct. (Another example, though in reverse, is Emperor Palpatine using the Force to bury the Lusankya, in plain sight, beneath the surface of the planet Coruscant.)

Abel G. Peña Messenger Question

And when Palpatine fought Mace and Yoda, he hadn't fought anyone on his level for 13 years either and seemed to be doing pretty well... no offence, but dumb argument, tbh. Experience rarely, if ever, matters in a fight between master-level Force users.

If he has advantages in any of those areas, you sure haven't provided proof of them yet. [/B]

^ not quoting properly so putting this here so I can copy-paste

Ok I am eagerly awaiting your response 🙂

All you have here is pretty much speculation. Yes, you might think it is "intuitive," "fairly reasonable" and "safe to say" that Luke unlocked more of his potential and surpassed Sidious on his own, but "I think" is not evidence. I could just as well play the same game and retort that it_isn't_a reasonable assertion (I'm not actually making that claim for the record, so don't try to shift the burden of proof on me; I was just demonstrating how inneffective your current argument is). Provide substantial proof for your case; claims made without evidence can be dismissed wihout evidence.

Uh I think I provided reasons in the block you quoted. Here’s a list of reasons including some of them and more:
1. The meditation is not emphasized as epic and noteworthy, which it would be if it were actually enough to match like 30 years of power progression from one of the fastest learning characters in the mythos. Indeed, from what I recall of the various sources that detail the fight, only a few of them even bother to mention Leia’s BM!
2. Luke doesn’t seem to notice it, he asks Leia to help him and she says she already is. This suggests the boost was modest in quantity and not transforming his Force abilities by orders of magnitude.
3. Why would Leia, an untrained quasi-padawan in DE, have this ultra battle meditation beyond anything we’d seen in Star Wars? You could say it’s because of Luke and Leia’s connection but then later we see battle melds between Skywalkers in NJO and LotF and they do not have nearly the same impact.
It should also be noted that Luke doesn’t only defeat Palpatine, he defeats him pretty easily. So you have to argue that amped DE Luke > peak Luke by a pretty considerable margin, and this is not supported by much of anything.
Additionally: most sources do not imagine the gap between RotJ Palpatine and RotJ Vader to be astronomical, given that Lucas pens Vader to be about “80%” of Palpatine at the time. I think it’s a little silly to take the “80%” phrase literally except to mean “there’s a noticeable gap but it isn’t absolutely incredible”. Luke has gone from his ESB level self to matching RotJ Vader in sabers in like the course of a year. He then is described by Cronal as more powerful in the Force than Vader, and “soon” Palpatine, in the Shadows of Mindor, aka 6 months after Endor. Extrapolate Luke’s growth from there and you have to pull some very weird tricks to say he isn’t past DE Palpatine at any point in his career, given that we only know that DE Sidious had some more time to study and grow stronger, but it’s not as if he magically leapt forward by much more than what we were used to Sidious growing more powerful by.
(There are enough sources describing Luke and Vader as “evenly matched” for me to not immediately buy that Vader was just holding back in the actual duel, especially given that Luke appeared to be the one holding back).

Outside of circumstantial showings, what does Luke have to top Sheev? Sheev already absolutely curbstomped Luke in their first fight, and has feats like matching evenly with Yoda and an amped Mace Windu, canonically the two best Jedi duelists ever up to that point in history, only behind Anakin. I haven't seen anything from Vader or Caedus or anyone else Luke fought that'd suggest they're up to par with the guys Palpatine squared off against.


Well his first fight against Luke is kind of irrelevant here, obviously. People already seriously debate RotJ Vader vs. Windu in sabers, and mostly think Vader > Windu in the Force. Luke is Vader’s match as a duelist by RotJ and described as stronger than him in the force just six months later by Cronal who, as mentioned above, speculates he’ll soon surpass Palpatine as well. This is really early into Luke’s power progression.
You will have to assert that:
1. Luke grows super powerful through RotJ but then suddenly stagnates and only grows at a marginal pace since then, or
2. Palpatine is like a million times more powerful than Vader despite Lucas’s comments, and Cronal was just talking out of his ass, as was Lucas when he said Luke could become what his father was supposed to.
Neither of these are supported by the evidence. Luke is described as growing substantially more powerful multiple times after RotJ, .i.e. by Palpatine himself in DE.

How big were the dovin basals and Bast Castle? Unless you give me a specific size, those feats are unquantifiable.

I had made a thread on this topic but tbh the dovin basal debates get a little bit of a mess so I’ll just drop this feat because I don’t think I need it.

Same with Caedus - provide proof for why ragdolling that guy is impressive.

He’s described as more powerful than Vader in the LotF: Invincible hardcover.

Until then, I'm not seeing how any of them match up to telekinetically manipulating a nineteen-kilometer-long Super Star Destroyer (while also multitasking with other Force powers which I may get into later depending on how this debate goes):

You know I buy that Palpatine used the Force to TP people watching the Lusankya, but I do wonder why he would need to use TK instead of, you know, engines or something.
Anyway, given that Vader’s fortress goes from the beach to the clouds and is large enough to hold a starship hanger, I think lifting it all at once and then crushing it to dust is more impressive than merely guiding the Lusankya’s fall from a pure TK perspective – but this is the best case scenario for you where you can establish that he actually uses TK. The best evidence you have is that an author on facebook messenger said it was “analogous” to other equally debated feats.

And when Palpatine fought Mace and Yoda, he hadn't fought anyone on his level for 13 years either and seemed to be doing pretty well... no offence, but dumb argument, tbh. Experience rarely, if ever, matters in a fight between master-level Force users.

Sure it does. Palpatine still had to train Maul and keep himself prepared for the Jedi, but after RotS made his contempt for dueling pretty clear and did not seem to have a motive to keep practicising. Not sure why experience isn’t going to matter.

If he has advantages in any of those areas, you sure haven't provided proof of them yet.

Why would Lucas claim that Luke has the potential to become what his father could have been if even after intense power growths he still hasn’t matched Palpatine by like his sixties? Authorial intent clearly favors Luke > Sidious, as does powerscaling (mentioned above). If the feats favor Sidious, you haven’t provided any except that he can “use the dark side” to bury the Lusankya, which would mean all sorts of things.

^ blah it copies weirdly from word

Tabbing doesn't work on KMC. The only way to indent is to use a blank image with KMC's background color with the measurements you want.

Visiting my grandparents today. I have **** all to do there so I'm saving the response for then.

People already seriously debate RotJ Vader vs. Windu in sabers, and mostly think Vader > Windu in the Force.

😕

Authorial intent clearly favors Luke > Sidious

😕 😕 😕