Poll
43%
57%
Valkorion is more powerful, versatile, masterful, tbh, but Yoda's way, way better in actual combat.
Valkorion isn't that more powerful to dominate Yoda, their Force exchange would be in his favor, but it would be still a hard and long fight, and it won't prevent Yoda from pushing through into close quarters, sooner or later. And then Valkorion gets slaughtered. Utilizing Force Barrier against saber attacks is infinitely more taxing than just swinging the saber. Especialy when you have to do it against somebody who is a master swordsman of Yoda's calliber with, like, dozens of strikes per second.
Arcann has nothing on either Yoda or Valkorion's power tho. Not to mention saber combat. Valky is just so powerful he can have no problem defending against Arcann's saber barage, and easily finish him off with the Force. He can't one-shot Yoda with Lightning, and he can't do half as well against Yoda's saber ability as he did against Arcann either.
Originally posted by Pessimystic
I thought it was almost universally agreed upon that Valkorion > ROTS Sidious & Yoda
No. They both scale off Plagueis and TPM Sidious who have some ridiculous feats. For example, just his arrival on the planet Naboo sent it into the coldest winter in living memory and generated seismic events across the planet. Both he and
Aside from that Yoda's Jedi Order, in particular, was raised specifically to fight the wars of the Old Republic. I'm of the mind that Yoda would be quite well prepared to fight any of the Sith Empires of old. That was his problem, and why he ended up losing to Darth Sidious. The ROTS narrative kind of makes that clear.