Originally posted by Ursumeles
LeG, don't believe everything you see in the internet.
The video I cited offers a rebuttal for controlled demolition theory in regards to WTC-7. Controlled demolition is very noisy activity as apparent from examples in the video - you can clearly hear sounds of explosions in a controlled demolition theme. Noise patterns of WTC-7 are different during its collapse.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDSee rebuttal of JKBart. The video assumes that the secret technology of the government works like ours.
I do not.The video I cited offers a rebuttal for controlled demolition theory in regards to WTC-7. Controlled demolition is very noisy activity as apparent from examples in the video - you can clearly hear sounds of explosions in a controlled demolition theme. Noise patterns of WTC-7 are different during its collapse.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDThat in no way addresses the fact that the media was silent about WTC 7, and that the 9/11 commission claimed they had no explanation for how the building was destroyed even 10 years after the fact.
I do not.The video I cited offers a rebuttal for controlled demolition theory in regards to WTC-7. Controlled demolition is very noisy activity as apparent from examples in the video - you can clearly hear sounds of explosions in a controlled demolition theme. Noise patterns of WTC-7 are different during its collapse.
Coincidence that everyone knows about the two buildings that were run down by radical Muslims with planes, but not the one building that free-fell for no apparent reason, in the same city, on the same day? I think not.
Originally posted by ILS
That in no way addresses the fact that the media was silent about WTC 7, and that the 9/11 commission claimed they had no explanation for how the building was destroyed even 10 years after the fact.Coincidence that everyone knows about the two buildings that were run down by radical Muslims with planes, but not the one building that free-fell for no apparent reason, in the same city, on the same day? I think not.
Reasonable details in Wikipedia as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center
Report of NIST might not be perfect and fires might not be the only factor that caused structural failure but WTC-7 collapsed due to "structural failure."
Why people trying to make a mountain out of a molehill?
Every building is different and fires affect every building differently accordingly.
It is easy to construct a narrative through circumstantial evidences by the way.
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenDWell, thank god one obscure report from four years after the initial event (that the 9/11 commission failed to mention) gave us the totally adequate explanation that the building randomly fell over due to "structural failure."
Report of NIST might not be perfect and fires might not be the only factor that caused structural failure but WTC-7 collapsed due to "structural failure."
And what a day for it. It's nothing short of stupendous, after all, that the WTC 7 happened to fall over on the same day cave-dwelling sand jockeys from Islamistan decided to hijack commercial aircrafts and fly them into the other World Trade Centres. Funny coincidence, that.
But again, thank god for the NIST report. Must have just been a fire. Accidents happen.
Originally posted by |King Joker|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq_LrkLVaU4
ILS is gonna be an InfoWars anchor by the end of the year