Originally posted by Putinbot1
The burden of proof lies with you to prove you assertation, I for one am not convinced.
So you want a video to prove its point, eh?
How about stop being lazy and research the answers yourself? Those claims and numbers can be easily proven or debunked. "Burden of proof" my ass. Burden of being lazy is the problem.
Originally posted by dadudemonBut the burden of proof as with any hypothesis is with the person propagating it surely, or is the world flat?
So you want a video to prove its point, eh?How about stop being lazy and research the answers yourself? Those claims and numbers can be easily proven or debunked. "Burden of proof" my ass. Burden of being lazy is the problem.
Originally posted by Bashar TegI am unable to convince those who cannot see the curvature of the Earth when looking at the Ocean because they are that retarded. Unlike Elon Musk, I am not so deluded I think I am Tony Stark. A space elevator is beyond me, sadly I will leave that to DarthSkywalker to construct from mechano or lego.
can you prove that it is not flat, in a manner that will satisfy flat earthers? or are you just too lazy to invent a space elevator?
Originally posted by Putinbot1
But the burden of proof as with any hypothesis is with the person propagating it surely,
And he supplied is data. The burden is on you to provide different data. Or to prove your assertion if you disagree.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
or is the world flat?
I say the world is round (oblate spheroid):
Now both of us must prove our positions.
Okay, here:
https://www.livescience.com/60544-ways-to-prove-earth-is-round.html
See how this works?
You cannot just disagree with someone. Anyone can disagree. You must prove your position.
What internet morons like to do is just say, "burden of proof."
Pretend dude A says 33 people ate watermelon at the party because he counted all the people who had watermelon on their plates from the photos.
Dude B disagrees. Okay, great. Prove your disagreeable position. What truth is it that you wish to assert? That there were less? More? That there was no watermelon?
Disagreeing is not a position. Asserting another position, which is just as burden proofy as the original, is possible.
In other words, stop being a coward and take a stance. Disagreeing is a cowards way out and does nothing.
Originally posted by Blindside12
Ahh so you have nothing to say of actual substance👆People can still be low skilled workers that leave their country and take away from that countries raw gdp, worker population and taxable income for the country.
Nothing I said contradicts what I said, you lack the ability to think substantively because your just trying to win this argument.
**** off👆
No, you're just not hearing what you want to hear, and you don't know what you're ****ing talking about.
Roy Beck argues that immigration hurts the immigrant's home country's economy, while doing next to nothing for people as humanitarian cause because there are still billions of poorer people in the world...
I don't know of anyone who claimed immigration to wealthier developed countries was the solution to world poverty. Humanitarianism takes a utilitarian approach of helping as many people as possible--the numbers that count--and was never an all-or-nothing endeavor. The only thing he suggested that I found agreeable was the need to develop impoverished countries, but he shared no ideas of his own on how to do so. Infrastructure, technology, agriculture, and potable water programs seem like a good start.
Whatever losses in raw GDP a country might experience are often recouped, and then some, via remittances from immigrants who now make enough to support themselves AND their families back home.
A remittance is a transfer of money by a foreign worker to an individual in his or her home country. Money sent home by migrants competes with international aid as one of the largest financial inflows to developing countries. Workers' remittances are a significant part of international capital flows, especially with regard to labour-exporting countries.[1] In 2014, $436 billion went to developing countries, setting a new record. Overall global remittances totaled $582 billion in 2015.[2] Some countries, such as India and China, receive tens of billions of US dollars in remittances each year from their expatriates and diaspora. In 2014, India received an estimated $70 billion and China an estimated $64 billion.[3]
As long as we're discussing poverty, I'd take it a bit further and suggest we need the following here at home:
*a drastic redistribution of wealth via tax reform that favors the poor working classes and the middle class
*a significantly-reduced military budget;
*an increase to infrastructure projects;
*free public universities;
*a single-payer healthcare system;
*and stricter legal accountability for elected officials and businessmen.
Eternal Idol 2020
Originally posted by Eternal Idol*a drastic redistribution of wealth via tax reform that favors the poor working classes and the middle class
*a significantly-reduced military budget;
*an increase to infrastructure projects;
*free public universities;
*a single-payer healthcare system;
*and stricter legal accountability for elected officials and businessmen.
[B]Eternal Idol 2020
[/B]
Wow. That is Full on Whiny Millennial List Right There..Even that last Point because it would not be done FAIRLY!!!!
Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Isn't that the guy YOU wanted to be Preisdent but your Party PHUKED you over for to support a Dried up Old Kunt? [/B]
The one and the same, yet once again, you assume I'll defend Democrats simply because they're Democrats and not Republicans. The DNC absolutely ****ed over Sanders, and though the Trump alternative was worse, the Democrats worked hard to earn that loss by being complicit with the establishment status quo.
It was a shitty thing to do, and by doing selling out the more popular Democratic candidate, they sold out a great chunk of their progressive base on top of losing the election. **** them for that.
Originally posted by dadudemon
So you want a video to prove its point, eh?How about stop being lazy and research the answers yourself? Those claims and numbers can be easily proven or debunked. "Burden of proof" my ass. Burden of being lazy is the problem.
What do you have against laziness? It's fun and satisfying.