Master Wyellett vs Plo Koon

Started by ILS4 pages

I said there may be reason to believe TCW Maul grew a lot, not that TPM Maul is inferior to Opress, which doesn't make much sense. 😬

I admit I can see Wyelett taking it in the force, perhaps decisively, but how does he stomp?

Plo's tunnel feat was accomplished 14 years prior to ROTS. He has other feats around the same time, such as completely freezing streams( or was it rivers), blanketing a horizon with fog, as well as accolades such as being one of the greatest heroes in the galaxy while only a padawan.

Originally posted by ILS
I said there may be reason to believe TCW Maul grew a lot, not that TPM Maul is inferior to Opress, which doesn't make much sense. 😬

Uh, you never said anything about oppress>maul not making sense. Furthermore your first sentence(of yer second post) presented evidence to make what i said more plausible. You also said "still, it makes sense overall" when I originally brought up the scaling.

Also, Maul growing a lot would only be relevant if it was an explanation for Oppress being>TPM Maul

You were cool with it, don't be in denial.

And Oppress>TPM Maul seems reasonable to me given

A. Oppress has much better feats
B. Oppress beat a more impressive opponent more decisively

Anywho, I have to go to school. C ya.

I think you're getting a bit sperged out because I humoured you. A great honor, to be sure, but I agree, your time would be better spent at school.

Oppress beat Koon by pulling his mask off. Jinn lacks such a glaring weakness and had Kenobi backing him up for most of the fight, so I don't think you can directly compare the two fights.

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Maul never outskilled Oppress in season 4. The prior season had Ventress koing Kenobi in a 2 v 1 and Oppress was able to stalemate her per Feloni. Meanwhile Maul got taken out twice by a physically and mentally wrecked Kenobi in the first minuite needing external aid to get out of trouble. There's literally nothing suggesting resurrected Maul is even on par with Oppress.

A physically and mentally wrecked Maul was also stalemating Savage in a bout of pure strength, and wrecked him less than a few months after his ressurection.

Unless you want to argue TCW Maul can one-shot TPM Maul from a mere month(s) of growth from that power-level, well then either Maul has a higher potential than Anakin or your argument is absolute horsesh!t.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Oppress beat Koon by pulling his mask off. Jinn lacks such a glaring weakness and had Kenobi backing him up for most of the fight, so I don't think you can directly compare the two fights.
Koon had clone troopers shooting Opress in the back throughout, and he had been kicked to his knees before his mask was pulled off - he lost. Jinn's showing on Tatooine and when the laser door re-opened are better.

Originally posted by MythLord
A physically and mentally wrecked Maul was also stalemating Savage in a bout of pure strength,

One who obviously wasn't trying to hurt Maul.

Unless you want to argue TCW Maul can one-shot TPM Maul from a mere month(s) of growth from that power-level, well then either Maul has a higher potential than Anakin or your argument is absolute horsesh!t.

Uh, Maul one-shotted Oppress via use of his cybernetic legs. You can look at Kenobi or Dooku as examples of why the gap isn't that drastic in terms of skill.

And it should be obvious from just how Maul fared vs Kenobi the difference was massive. Resurrected maul was put down twice by a massively hindered kenobi in less than a minute, season 5 went toe to toe with a fresh kenobi for about a minute.

Maul literally overpowered and disarmed Savage within two blows, before finally stomping on him with his cybernetic legs. He'd still be capable of doing the same to TPM Maul by your logic, which is stupid.

When was Maul "put down" by a massively hindered Kenobi?

Originally posted by Rockydonovang
Resurrected maul was put down twice by a massively hindered kenobi in less than a minute [/B]

Rockydonowank ladies and gentleman.

Maul does suck though ngl.