Actually no, I just googled "f*ck Flynn and then we f*ck Trump"
Originally posted by Blindside12
Actually no, I just googled "f*ck Flynn and then we f*ck Trump"
Your link leads you to sites like TruePundit and TheGatewayPundit, which are whackjob sensationalist tinfoilhatery conspiracy sites.
Originally posted by Surtur
A tweet I just saw...[b]"Never forget FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, the second highest ranking FBI official, said “f*ck Flynn and then we f*ck Trump” that says it all."
Lol uh...this best be a lie. [/B]
Is this your source?
https://twitter.com/Lrihendry?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Say it ain't so, Surt
Originally posted by Robtard
Your link leads you to sites like TruePundit and TheGatewayPundit, which are whackjob sensationalist tinfoilhatery conspiracy sites.
Considering McCabe hated Flynn, I dont doubt these specific claims. Considering every day on the left people are saying "**** Trump" its not hard to believe someone else would.
The flynn investigation was clearly retaliation of Flynn backing up sexual allegations against McCabe.
"The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after the retired Army general roiled the bureau’s leadership by intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination, according to documents and interviews."
Originally posted by Blindside12
Strzok said fck Trump, and you didnt care, why would you care about this? There are texts from Strzok saying the same thing, and having a meeting in Andy's office about this.if you didnt care then you dont care now. You have never cared about FBI corruption.
Oh boy. I care about freedom of speech, actually.
Are people not allowed to think freely? Unless you think McCabe was going to outright falsify evidence, it doesn't matter how he feels as long as he can do his job. This is an aside to us not even knowing if he actually said that, considering the source.
Been said before: it's actually better to have someone who is going to look at things with extreme scrutiny due to bias in a case like this than something who is going to do a half-assed job because they're a biased Trumper. Look at what the House Intelligence Committee Republicans did recently with declaring "no collusion" and then we find out they didn't interview certain people they should have; they didn't request and review certain documents they should have etc. Basically a rushed hack job.
IMO, it's why the Trumpersphere is shitting itself over Mueller constantly, he's someone who is going to turn over every rock, leaf and twig regardless of where it leads and this scares them; it scares them to nightmares. On the bright side for you, if Mueller clears Trump, it's probably a safe bet Trump is indeed innocent.
Originally posted by Robtard
Are people not allowed to think freely? Unless you think McCabe was going to outright falsify evidence, it doesn't matter how he feels as long as he can do his job. This is an aside to us not even knowing if he actually said that, considering the source.Been said before: it's actually better to have someone who is going to look at things with extreme scrutiny due to bias in a case like this than something who is going to do a half-assed job because they're a biased Trumper. Look at what the House Intelligence Committee Republicans did recently with declaring "no collusion" and then we find out they didn't interview certain people they should have; they didn't request and review certain documents they should have etc. Basically a rushed hack job.
IMO, it's why the Trumpersphere is shitting itself over Mueller constantly, he's someone who is going to turn over every rock, leaf and twig regardless of where it leads and this scares them; it scares them to nightmares. On the bright side for you, if Mueller clears Trump, it's probably a safe bet Trump is indeed innocent.
I LOVE this logic. People with extreme bias will, gosh darnit, do a better job.
We get to apply it to all investigations, correct?
Originally posted by Robtard
Are people not allowed to think freely? Unless you think McCabe was going to outright falsify evidence, it doesn't matter how he feels as long as he can do his job. This is an aside to us not even knowing if he actually said that, considering the source.Been said before: it's actually better to have someone who is going to look at things with extreme scrutiny due to bias in a case like this than something who is going to do a half-assed job because they're a biased Trumper. Look at what the House Intelligence Committee Republicans did recently with declaring "no collusion" and then we find out they didn't interview certain people they should have; they didn't request and review certain documents they should have etc. Basically a rushed hack job.
IMO, it's why the Trumpersphere is shitting itself over Mueller constantly, he's someone who is going to turn over every rock, leaf and twig regardless of where it leads and this scares them; it scares them to nightmares. On the bright side for you, if Mueller clears Trump, it's probably a safe bet Trump is indeed innocent.
He falsified testimony, is that not enough for you, hence why he was fired, because he lied to the FBi and DOJ and the OIG found out.
The OIG isnt some Trumpster, the guy was appointed by Obama.