Originally posted by Blindside12
He falsified testimony, is that not enough for you, hence why he was fired, because he lied to the FBi and DOJ and the OIG found out.The OIG isnt some Trumpster, the guy was appointed by Obama.
The truly pathetic thing is they wouldn't react the same way with the roles reversed. They would not go "well, bias is a good think, cuz..reasons!".
Rob would see the fox guarding the hen house and think "That shit is legit".
Originally posted by BackFire
I'm upset.
Originally posted by Robtard
Is this your source?https://twitter.com/Lrihendry?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Say it ain't so, Surt
Her background is worth the price of admission alone
Originally posted by Robtard
Are people not allowed to think freely? Unless you think McCabe was going to outright falsify evidence, it doesn't matter how he feels as long as he can do his job. This is an aside to us not even knowing if he actually said that, considering the source.Been said before: it's actually better to have someone who is going to look at things with extreme scrutiny due to bias in a case like this than something who is going to do a half-assed job because they're a biased Trumper. Look at what the House Intelligence Committee Republicans did recently with declaring "no collusion" and then we find out they didn't interview certain people they should have; they didn't request and review certain documents they should have etc. Basically a rushed hack job.
IMO, it's why the Trumpersphere is shitting itself over Mueller constantly, he's someone who is going to turn over every rock, leaf and twig regardless of where it leads and this scares them; it scares them to nightmares. On the bright side for you, if Mueller clears Trump, it's probably a safe bet Trump is indeed innocent.
Originally posted by Blindside12
He falsified testimony, is that not enough for you, hence why he was fired, because he lied to the FBi and DOJ and the OIG found out.The OIG isnt some Trumpster, the guy was appointed by Obama.
Originally posted by Robtard
According to Sessions, McCabe “lacked candor” and “wasn’t forthcoming”, this is why he was fired. Which is fair enough, but are we forgetting that Sessions also did the same when questioned by the FBI, as did several other members of the Trump admin. Why the floating standards.
Stop whining kid.
Originally posted by Robtard
According to Sessions, McCabe “lacked candor” and “wasn’t forthcoming”, this is why he was fired. Which is fair enough, but are we forgetting that Sessions also did the same when questioned by the FBI, as did several other members of the Trump admin. Why the floating standards.
This is factually incorrect, also Mueller cleared Sessions of any wrong doing and moved on. He was not recommend to be fired by neither him, the OIG, or the DOJ or the Office of Professional ethics.
Not really: Sessions said the firing — carried out a little more than a day before McCabe was set to retire from the FBI — was triggered by internal reviews that concluded McCabe violated Justice Department policies and was not forthcoming with investigators probing FBI actions before the 2016 presidential election.
Justice Department officials determined that “McCabe had made an unauthorized disclosure to the news media and lacked candor — including under oath — on multiple occasions," the attorney general said in a statement. -snip
Sessions still had to recuse himself for his initial not fully forthcoming testimony.
Fair enough then.
In the end, Sessions decided to recuse himself from any investigations into cases related to the 2016 campaign, though he claimed it was because his own department had looked into the matter. But let’s be blunt: It was the Republican chorus of calls for recusal that forced the issue. What made them so significant is that Washington is far more politically polarized than it was in Watergate days, when conservative and moderate Democrats and moderate and liberal Republicans actually walked among us. For these GOP office-holders to break ranks—knowing the potential cost of angering the Trumpist base of their party—suggests they sense real political danger in marching in complete lockstep with the White House. (Issa won his seat last November by just a 51 percent to 49 percent margin.) After all, Republicans can’t possibly know how deep the Trump-Russia rabbit hole goes, so it would be risky to stick out their necks for a president who—to put it charitably—has acted really strangely toward Moscow. -snip