Originally posted by MrMindgladiator did lift the baxter building, so he has comparable strength to wonder woman who pulled part of the earth 😆
Gladiator also punched a planet apart, while Wonder Woman never even came close to a feat like that. Gladiator has to punch her once for real and her jaw is gone.
Originally posted by Enzeru
Gladiator also punched a planet apart, while Wonder Woman never even came close to a feat like that. Gladiator has to punch her once for real and her jaw is gone.
Battle feat wise, WW wins a huge majority. Gladiator would only power her up. WW is about to go up against Darkseid. Gladiator is low herald, not high.
Originally posted by Enzeru
Gladiator also punched a planet apart, while Wonder Woman never even came close to a feat like that. Gladiator has to punch her once for real and her jaw is gone.
Do you mean the feat where he broke a planet up by REPEATEDLY punching it ?
If so then the feat is unclear for many reasons and a factual analysis can suggest that if he punches as hard as a nuclear bomb, then could drastically crack the planet's crust and lead to the planet becoming unstrable and exploding. also there was no mention of the size of that planet
So it's as unquantifiable as wonder woman pulling earth feat at best
Originally posted by TheHulkster
For purposes of this thread, an off panel confirmed feat > a feat not performed by Wonder Woman.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Yes, that's so confusing. It's Gladiator vs. Wonder Woman. And he randomly posts scans of 3 Daxamites performing a feat? And from an era where Diana would be lucky to lift a city? And of course, it's Superman related in some tangent way.
Hence why space cheese is irrelevant.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Only if you are going by space cheese. On panel feats are better than off panel feats
It was in response to Hulkster idiotic claim.Hence why space cheese is irrelevant.
What idiotic claim? The three push the planet to the other side of its sun. Are you disputing this?
Your feat is not an on panel feat for Diana. It’s not even her feat at all. The question of why you would even post it and claim it to be a superior feat for her when it’s not even her feat is a legitimate question.
Originally posted by zopzop
The planet was massive enough to have an atmosphere capable of supporting intelligent life. Look around our solar system to get an idea for the minimum size for something like that : Mars, Ganymede, Titan, etc...
Size alone doth not an atmosphere make. There factors are also in play - distance from the star etc.
Originally posted by MrMind
Do you mean the feat where he broke a planet up by REPEATEDLY punching it ?If so then the feat is unclear for many reasons and a factual analysis can suggest that if he punches as hard as a nuclear bomb, then could drastically crack the planet's crust and lead to the planet becoming unstrable and exploding. also there was no mention of the size of that planet
So it's as unquantifiable as wonder woman pulling earth feat at best
How much of the weight did she pull?