OWAW Superman vs Full power Tyrant.

Started by panthergod14 pages


Originally posted by TheHulkster
Tyrant also absorbs power fro Gladiator, BRB, Jack of Hearts and Ganymede. It is not expressed nor shown that Galactus has any specific vulnerability to his power.

And what specifically do we see Imperiex do with his own power? Kill Doomsday? Be unable to stop a couple of teams from destroying his ship and maneuvering him into position? No, Imperiex would be lucky to be Galactus level. Galactus doesn’t have to worry about exploding when his armor is breached.

Full power Tyrant was a near match for Galactus and galaxies were destroyed by their fight. His weaker form would stomp your beloved. A cosmic powered Superman was shown to be nothing to Galactus.

"Skyfather" Tyrant is barely beyond an Imperiex Probe's average, let alone HP Doomsday. 😂

😆 😆 😂

If Tyrant can absorb Galactus' power, that is a tactical advantage for him.

Tyrant also absorbs power fro Gladiator, BRB, Jack of Hearts and Ganymede. It is not expressed nor shown that Galactus has any specific vulnerability to his power.


.. But he does have a disadvantage if his attacks empower his opponent. Not complicated.

quote:
Let's see that showing.

and, yes, I WILL laugh if you are trying to pretend as if Galactus is anywhere near Imperiex, who is deliberately far beyond him in every single way ion terms of raw power.

.. oh.. and He's above Lifebringer Galactus as well. laughing out loud

And what specifically do we see Imperiex do with his own power? Kill Doomsday? Be unable to stop a couple of teams from destroying his ship and maneuvering him into position? No, Imperiex would be lucky to be Galactus level. Galactus doesn’t have to worry about exploding when his armor is breached.


Imperiex Destroyed and created universes with his own power.

..FAR beyond Galactus, by far. Galactus isnt even close. Oh, and killing Doomsday is well beyond Galactus' power, as at far lesser levels he survived the Total power output of a Guardian of the Universe, who are Skyfather class, same tier as Galactus, who is in the same class as Watchers since his first appearance.

Galactus gets outperfomed by Quasar. pathetic.


Full power Tyrant was a near match for Galactus and galaxies were destroyed by their fight. His weaker form would stomp your beloved. A cosmic powered Superman was shown to be nothing to Galactus.

A weakened Darkseid was superior to Time Trapper, who warps entire Timelines. Darkseid's mere presence keeps Reality from being destroyed.

Ohh. a mentally compromised Superman under Galactus' control cant beat Galactus. big surprise.


"Skyfather" Tyrant is barely beyond an Imperiex Probe's average, let alone HP Doomsday. laughing out loud

quote:

Stuperman and Doofusday would get curbstomped.[/quiote]

lol, "Skyfather" Tyrant can't even seriously harm a serious Superman at this point.

Doomsday tears him apart worse than Darkseid.

laughing laughing laughing out loud


Yeah, you heard me.

Tyrant has nothing in his existence superior to Superman at this point anyway. It's laughable.

Originally posted by zopzop
What people are forgetting is that Galactus fed on a world that made him feel more powerful than he had in ages (his words on panel) and he wanted to confront Tyrant on Galactus' turf. Keep in mind, all this prep by Galactus for "DP" Tyrant. Let that sink in.

... That means absolutely nothing if Tyrant could inherent be amped by Galactus' power. if anything this was helping Tyrant further. Galactus is an idiot here.

Originally posted by panthergod
.. Is that supposed to be impressive or something..? Darkseid fought a universe+ level Anti Monitor as a peer.

The AM he fights is around planet level.

A far less powerful Darkseid than the present was effortlessly dominating Galactus is a single thought's worth of power expenditure. Darkseid subsequently got far mroe pwoerful, having absorbed the power of multiple pantheons kf Gods since that time per Byrne. Galactus withstood a non physical BFR attack, nothing more. Galactus in no way shape or form demonstrated superior personal raw power to Darkseid, whatsoever. Bynre the writer staets that they were peers in power in that sotry, as anyone who is literate and could grasp the story beyond the pictures could clearly see.

Uhm, Darkseid activates tech with a thought and that tech gets a severely weakened Galactus on the ropes. Talking about comprehension.

Galactus no sells the heralded Omega Effect.

Byrne said that he had to think hard to figure a way to write this without Galactus killing Darkseid the first page. Only an illiterate can’t see that on the pages.

Phoenix BFR'd Darkseid, nothing more.

You mean manhandles a helpless Darkseid.


Galactus was beaten by Thor, who couldn't defeat Darkseid with Surfer's help.

Darkseid is beat down by a Superman who barely beats Thor.

Originally posted by panthergod
... That means absolutely nothing if Tyrant could inherent be amped by Galactus' power. if anything this was helping Tyrant further. Galactus is an idiot here.

Stop basing your argument on things you made up,

Originally posted by panthergod
If Tyrant can absorb Galactus' power, that is a tactical advantage for him.

Tyrant also absorbs power fro Gladiator, BRB, Jack of Hearts and Ganymede. It is not expressed nor shown that Galactus has any specific vulnerability to his power.

.. But he does have a disadvantage if his attacks empower his opponent. Not complicated.

Just like he would absorb Superman.

Imperiex Destroyed and created universes with his own power.

You mean with tech that manipulates nexus points.

..FAR beyond Galactus, by far. Galactus isnt even close. Oh, and killing Doomsday is well beyond Galactus' power, as at far lesser levels he survived the Total power output of a Guardian of the Universe, who are Skyfather class, same tier as Galactus, who is in the same class as Watchers since his first appearance.

We see Galactus devouring the multiverse. And a group of Guardians are knocked out by a blast that Guy Gardener brushes off. Galactus would whip them all.

Galactus gets outperfomed by Quasar. pathetic.

A weakened Galactus and you base this on lip service.

A weakened Darkseid was superior to Time Trapper, who warps entire Timelines. Darkseid's mere presence keeps Reality from being destroyed.

Reality is fine when he is killed. Stop making things up.

Ohh. a mentally compromised Superman under Galactus' control cant beat Galactus. big surprise.

Excuses. How exactly does this affect his power?

Tyrant has nothing in his existence superior to Superman at this point anyway. It's laughable.

Except for all of continuity LOL.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
The AM he fights is around planet level.

Uhm, Darkseid activates tech with a thought and that tech gets a severely weakened Galactus on the ropes. Talking about comprehension.

Galactus no sells the heralded Omega Effect.

Byrne said that he had to think hard to figure a way to write this without Galactus killing Darkseid the first page. Only an illiterate can’t see that on the pages.

You mean manhandles a helpless Darkseid.

Darkseid is beat down by a Superman who barely beats Thor.


How is he planet level? DC encyclopedia 2016 stated that he is as powerful as in COIE and had actually destroyed the multiverse but nobody remembers it.

Darkseid didn't activate any tech. Apokolips is his world and it all powers from him.

Byrne contradicts himself all the time. He also said Orion would defeat Silver Surfer. See how that works.

Just like Krona destroyed Galactus and was barely a peer to Kismet in his evolved form?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Just like he would absorb Superman.

Based on?

You mean with tech that manipulates nexus points.

No, just releasing his power created a new big bang. Far superior to Galactus.

We see Galactus devouring the multiverse. And a group of Guardians are knocked out by a blast that Guy Gardener brushes off. Galactus would whip them all.

Alternate Galactus.

Galactus was koed from a blast by Beyonder that Doom brushed off.

Also he is already whipped by a Guardian.

A weakened Galactus and you base this on lip service.

Lifebringer Galactus was weakened?

Reality is fine when he is killed. Stop making things up.

Even in Darkseid War, his death ****ed up entire reality. In Final Crisis, it almost destroyed the whole multiverse.

Excuses. How exactly does this affect his power?

His mental state dictates his power.

Except for all of continuity LOL.

Not in OWAW.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Based on?

No, just releasing his power created a new big bang. Far superior to Galactus.

Alternate Galactus.

Galactus was koed from a blast by Beyonder that Doom brushed off.

Also he is already whipped by a Guardian.

Lifebringer Galactus was weakened?

Even in Darkseid War, his death ****ed up entire reality. In Final Crisis, it almost destroyed the whole multiverse.

His mental state dictates his power.

Not in OWAW.

He triggers a Big Bang. He doesn’t create one. Genius-Vell does that. So does Reed Richards.

It’s Galactus in the near future.

A enormously enhanced Guardian. Why misrepresent?

Lifebringer is still weakened by what Logos does to him on top of other things. The writer confirmed this.

Originally posted by abhilegend
How is he planet level? DC encyclopedia 2016 stated that he is as powerful as in COIE and had actually destroyed the multiverse but nobody remembers it.

Darkseid didn't activate any tech. Apokolips is his world and it all powers from him.

Byrne contradicts himself all the time. He also said Orion would defeat Silver Surfer. See how that works.

Just like Krona destroyed Galactus and was barely a peer to Kismet in his evolved form?

Krona evolved to something weaker.

Anyhow, what Byrne said is in line with what he showed regarding Galactus compared to Darkseid.

The UN is a part of Galactus. So I guess we can use that right?

AM has only ever destroyed universes by utilizing tech, specifically his antimatter gun.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
He triggers a Big Bang. He doesn’t create one. Genius-Vell does that. So does Reed Richards.

It’s Galactus in the near future.

A enormously enhanced Guardian. Why misrepresent?

Lifebringer is still weakened by what Logos does to him on top of other things. The writer confirmed this.


Incorrect again. DC encyclopedia states that Imperiex had the power of a big bang. The same happened when his energy was released at beginning of time.

The guardian only destroyed and absorbed universes under his own power. No external amps.

No, Lifebringer flat out said that his entire power would be ineffective against the shield. Never shown to be weakened.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
Krona evolved to something weaker.

Anyhow, what Byrne said is in line with what he showed regarding Galactus compared to Darkseid.

The UN is a part of Galactus. So I guess we can use that right?

AM has only ever destroyed universes by utilizing tech, specifically his antimatter gun.


Krona evolved into something weaker when he was explicitly more powerful? Only a marvel zombie can be so stupid.

No, he didn't show that. Darkseid defeated Galactus with a mere thought. Deal with it.

Galactus does not has UN in majority of the appearances despite the idiotic retcon by Loeb.

Incorrect, anti Monitor destroyed all the universes by his own power.

Tyrant, no contest.

Originally posted by Inedian
Tyrant, no contest.

Based on?

Tyrant possibly one shots Superman.

In OWAW he never did anything impressive.

😂

Anyway the myth that anti Monitor used tech to destroy the universes is just that, a myth.

Here, it was revealed that Anti Monitor destroyed several universes and absorbed them just to get out of his prison.

He then continued to do that through the arc. He only built a cannon to destroy the five universes which the Monitor hid in his netherverse.

In fact the cannon is only built in the issue 8 where Flash destroyed it.

There is full review of the character here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CharacterRant/comments/8acth1/a_comprehensive_look_at_the_antimonitor/

Good review too.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Incorrect again. DC encyclopedia states that Imperiex had the power of a big bang. The same happened when his energy was released at beginning of time.

The guardian only destroyed and absorbed universes under his own power. No external amps.

No, Lifebringer flat out said that his entire power would be ineffective against the shield. Never shown to be weakened.
Krona evolved into something weaker when he was explicitly more powerful? Only a marvel zombie can be so stupid.

No, he didn't show that. Darkseid defeated Galactus with a mere thought. Deal with it.

Galactus does not has UN in majority of the appearances despite the idiotic retcon by Loeb.

Incorrect, anti Monitor destroyed all the universes by his own power.

The story repeatedly states that Imperiex has the power of the galaxies he absorbs. Galactus contains the essence of a universe.

Krona is amped in JLA/Avengers. Period. The one whipped by Hal is far weaker.

The writer confirms that Galactus is still weakened and also admits PIS.

AM destroys universes with tech. That is all that is ever shown. You can’t make things up the way you do for fanboy reasons.

Darkseid activates tech against a severely weakened Galactus. Surfer is empowered by Galactus and destroys all of those constructs. So Galactus is not defeated.

Originally posted by abhilegend
😂

Anyway the myth that anti Monitor used tech to destroy the universes is just that, a myth.

Here, it was revealed that Anti Monitor destroyed several universes and absorbed them just to get out of his prison.

He then continued to do that through the arc. He only built a cannon to destroy the five universes which the Monitor hid in his netherverse.

In fact the cannon is only built in the issue 8 where Flash destroyed it.

There is full review of the character here.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CharacterRant/comments/8acth1/a_comprehensive_look_at_the_antimonitor/

Good review too.

LOL at you posting a scan of him taking advantage of someone else’s expirement and linking to reddit.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
Tyrant possibly one shots Superman.

In OWAW he never did anything impressive.

True

Originally posted by TheHulkster
True
👆 what did he actually do that was impressive?

Originally posted by TheHulkster
The story repeatedly states that Imperiex has the power of the galaxies he absorbs. Galactus contains the essence of a universe.

Krona is amped in JLA/Avengers. Period. The one whipped by Hal is far weaker.

The writer confirms that Galactus is still weakened and also admits PIS.

AM destroys universes with tech. That is all that is ever shown. You can’t make things up the way you do for fanboy reasons.

Darkseid activates tech against a severely weakened Galactus. Surfer is empowered by Galactus and destroys all of those constructs. So Galactus is not defeated.


No, it was incorrectly assessed once by the scientists. Later on when he released his energies it created a second big bang.

When Galactus dies he created a star. So much for essence of a universe.

Where is that established that he is amped? JLA/Avengers Krona appears in Trinity and was never shown to be amped.

Where is that shown that Anti Monitor destroyed universes with tech? Here he destroyed anti Matter universe and absorbed all its energy without any tech.

At that time Anti Matter universe was almost as big as the infinite multiverse and Anti Monitor destroyed it totally.

Yes, he was. Explicitly stated.

Originally posted by TheHulkster
LOL at you posting a scan of him taking advantage of someone else’s expirement and linking to reddit.

Pariah only created a portal through which Anti Monitor destroyed his universe.

I'm still not seeing any scan which says Anti Monitor destroyed universes with tech.

I guess you don't have it as usual.

Originally posted by Insane Titan
👆 what did he actually do that was impressive?

Tank omega beams which pierced the armor of Imperiex himself?