The Appealment Of the 2nd Amendment

Originally posted by SquallX
Brown Bess-3 to 4 rpm
Canons
Swivel Guns
Mortar
The Pukle Gun- only two created, was never used
Girandori Air Rifle-20 mag
Belton flintlock- just a prototype

These weapons were being design, or were already created before the Admenments, or a few years after.

It’s asisine to think, the founding fathers were so stupid, that they couldn’t even for one second fathom the level of ingenuity of man to create better weapons.

Remember how the British fought? It was all mass formations on open field. But the founding fathers and their surbodinates had the clear mind to say. Hmm, the British outnumbered us, let’s not meet them in open field, but instead use guerilla warfare.

Not a one of those is considered full auto, and most arn't even able to fall within the semi-auto category... Especially in the modern definitions of those terms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm#Automatic

If they do REPEAL this Right... The People that come to Confiscate the Guns should not be Hypocrites and thus not be Protected by them.

Prove their own convictions and for once. NOT BE HYPOCRITES.

Originally posted by Robtard
eg You'd be too weak to load the cannon ball and even then, you'd probably blow yourself up as 18th century cannons were unstable and volatile.

haermm

18 Century Cannons Saved More Lives then they took.

Learn Your Facts and History you Silly Fascists.

There is zero chance that the second amendment would get repealed. The shitstorm it would cause would be unprecedented in modern times.

Originally posted by BackFire
There is zero chance that the second amendment would get repealed. The shitstorm it would cause would be unprecedented in modern times.

^ Pretty much this.

For the 2nd to even have a chance of being stripped away, some terrorist (if Brown/Black and or Muslim) or disgruntled lone-wolf with mental problems (if White and non-Muslim) would have to shoot up a school filled with the children of high ranking politicians, captains of industry and top-tier corporate heads. Then; only then would strict gun regulation be passed.

They mostly go to private schools that have some serious security.

Exactly, so you should really stop shitting yourself over your guns being taken away. Minor things might happen, like banning bumpstocks and maybe certain types of ammo, with suitable alternatives still being legal. But your precious guns by-and-large are safe. Believe me.

Calm down, you're letting your emotions get away from you.

lulface

Well I remain hopeful that a sufficient enough blue wave could lead to common sense gun laws being implemented and then a slow and steady road to full regulation.

Depends on what you consider common sense.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Well I remain hopeful that a sufficient enough blue wave could lead to common sense gun laws being implemented and then a slow and steady road to full regulation.

He's pragmatic, while he'd love a full on ban, he understands that at best we'd get here in the US is heavy regulation in regards to guns and even then that's still a pipe-dream at this point in time. Nothing much changed after Sandy Hook and we had a Dem in office. Nothing much is going to change now.

I'm just baffled though. Neph says he's a teetotaler like myself, yet is against the outright ban of alcohol. He also isn't a gun guy, and supports banning all guns.

I don't understand how he can be for banning only one of two things that cause death and suffering despite the banning of both alcohol and guns making no impact on his personal life.

Originally posted by Kurk
So is it full regulation or a straight up ban? Make up your mind, Neph.

He wants all guns to be banned, he's just applying the boiling frog principle.

Originally posted by Kurk
I'm just baffled though. Neph says he's a teetotaler like myself, yet is against the outright ban of alcohol. He also isn't a gun guy, and supports banning all guns.

I don't understand how he can be for banning only one of two things that cause death and suffering despite the banning of both alcohol and guns making no impact on his personal life.

I doubt it'd work in the UK where he lives; those guys are a bunch of boozers.

I don't drink because it's expensive and I hate the taste.

Originally posted by Robtard
He's pragmatic, while he'd love a full on ban, he understands that at best we'd get here in the US is heavy regulation in regards to guns and even then that's still a pipe-dream at this point in time. Nothing much changed after Sandy Hook and we had a Dem in office. Nothing much is going to change now.

yes

What specific regulations do you want?

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
Not a one of those is considered full auto, and most arn't even able to fall within the semi-auto category... Especially in the modern definitions of those terms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firearm#Automatic

For that period of time yes. Their was a big difference from firing one musket or canon, to firing 3 to 4 in a minute, or multiple canons at once.

I find it farfetched to believe the FF were to much imbeciles to not believe weapons couldn’t evolve when they themselves saw the shift from now and arrows to guns, to canons, mortars.

If we want to be technical, the 1st Amendment never covered the internet as a source for freedom of the press, afterall, the FF never once thoughts such a thing can exist.