Poll
19%
41%
4%
19%
19%
0%
Originally posted by The Ellimist
Yes, we all know he dwelled a lot on the implications that statement of relative power had on the continuity (outside of ~2017+ vs. debating, it meant nothing as 99+% of fans and authors didn't even know it existed).To be clear, I'm not rejecting it.
You could apply this logic to nigh all quotes tho.
Originally posted by DarthSkywalker0
You could apply this logic to nigh all quotes tho.
Hence why I'm not rejecting it, though I don't think it applies to all quotes (e.g. Palpatine has like a dozen supremacy quotes and the non-vs. EU fandom is pretty aware of his position as the most powerful Sith).
That's primarily because Malak's a less established character.
Malak's far superior powers should translate to, at the very least, substantially greater physicals. Malak's also noted to have emphasized heavily on lightsaber combat, with his combat achievements in the Mandalorian Wars allegedly just as influential as Revan's military tactics, and apparently pressured Darth Revan to a "desperate" state in their first duel (which is more impressive than beating Vodo). There's really no reason why Kun should win because of an imaginary advantage.
Mainly though, Malak's proven to be highly capable of interweaving his Force powers and lightsaber combat together, so if he's far more powerful than Kun that will definitely determine the fight.