Originally posted by SiniousCool. So you FINALLY agree/admit that the audio drama never implied that Luke was amped in sabers? Cool, now we can move on because that is all I have been saying this entire time, lol.
just like no one ever claimed the audio drama states that Luke was amped during the duel.
The rest of your post was just more hate-fueled ranting, of which there is no need for me to respond. Glad we got this much settled at least. 👆
Originally posted by Galan007LMFAO. Another proof of you being illiterate. I already said as much like 2 pages ago:
Cool. So you FINALLY agree/admit that the audio drama never implied that Luke was amped in sabers? Cool, now we can move on because that is all I have been saying this entire time, lol.
I said she was amping him in the comic, and that it was only omitted in the audiobook, but never contradicted. Learn how to read.
As for this:
The rest of your post was just more hate-fueled ranting, of which there is no need for me to respond. Glad we got this much settled at least. 👆You don't have the brain to make a proper case, so at least have the spine to concede.
Originally posted by Sheev
Disagree. Leia knew exactly when she started boosting Luke and so did Luke himself. If the boost was happening during the saber fight [which I also disagree with mind you] it was obviously borderline insignificant or else Luke would have known that his power was being increased. This isn't some inept forcetard we're talking about lol.. surely he can sense when external power is being dumped into him ?Comparing their preformances in ROTJ doesn't make sense. Both have become a good deal more powerful by DE.
Originally posted by Sheev
1. it wasn't stated in the original source material, which is what everyone is citing. in the source material Leia definitely know what was happening with her boost.2. In most forms of media [but esp. comics] it is very common for the protagonist to lose to the big bad in the first fight, but then come back and stomp the big bad in round 2 for no reason other then they're the good guy... literally hundreds of examples. that doesn't mean there must have been an amp by default. esp. when the other source gives no timeframe at all.
My soul cries out in sorrow, and my eyes weep blood at the sight of Sheev's namesake vilifying His Imperial Majesty. Oh, why? Why must you be so resistant to his divine allure? Why must you cause us so much pain with your recalcitrant secularisms?
Perhaps prayer will remedy your spiritual decay. Trust me - this is for your own good. Repeat after me:
Sweet Sheev
Sweet Sheev
Send your child
unto me
For the sins
of the unworthy
must be baptized
in blood and fear
I hope this helps. Come to me anytime with any holy and/or spiritual concerns, and I will give you Sheev's blessing to carry with you to battle. Never let your faith waver, my son.
Originally posted by SiniousHow old are you? Honest question, because I just can't imagine a grown adult incessantly throwing temper tantrums like this.
LMFAO. Another proof of you being illiterate. I already said as much like 2 pages ago:As for this: You don't have the brain to make a proper case, so at least have the spine to concede.
Indeed I could have responded to each and every one of the bash-filled non-points you made earlier for the lulz, and I was prepared to(I literally had the entire post typed up.) But then I asked myself: "Why"..? It's clear at this point that you cannot possibly have a civilized discussion when someone is disagreeing with you, and as I have already stated: I don't indulge that sort of behavior(I've dealt with too many quanchi's, Supra's, and abhi's to waste my time playing childish games like that.) It simply isn't necessary.
That said, I'm sure you will just respond back to me with more of your infantile insults and such, and you're more than welcome to do so(I'm pretty convinced that's your 'thing' at this point, and you seem to really crave getting the last word.) However, I simply will not respond to that sort of BS beyond this.
Now, if you surprise me and actually send a civilized adult response my way, I'd be more than happy to continue this 'discussion' with you. The ball is in your court. 🙂
Originally posted by DarthAnt66That's pretty sad, then.
Galan, if you thought Sinious' posts were "hate-filled" then you've really only paid attention to debates here for a few weeks.His post was standard - arguably leaning nice.
The days of civilized debates are a relic of the ancient past, it seems. 🙁
@Galan, The whole time, I was talking about how other sources confirm what the audiobook only omitted, but never contradicted, and your last response to me was this:
Originally posted by Galan007
Cool. So you FINALLY agree/admit that the audio drama never implied that Luke was amped in sabers? Cool, now we can move on because that is all I have been saying this entire time, lol.
I think it sums up our discussion and how you didn't address my points.
Originally posted by DarthAnt66tbh
Your rants demanding Sinious improve his etiquette is a lot worse, tbh.
Originally posted by Sinious...But I did address that earlier in the thread. Multiple times.
@Galan, I was talking about how other sources confirm what the audiobook only omitted, but never contradicted
Maybe you should go back and reread our convo, and then ask me for clarification if you still have any questions pertaining to my opinion on the matter?