Doomsday vs. Thor

Originally posted by h1a8
It was shown, but with some push force. Heat is energy. And force = energy as meant by Etri

Yes, it was shown that Doomsday could be cut by a regular sword. After all physics says he couldn't have been pushing with much force as force is determined by mass times acceleration.

Again, be consistent.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Yes, it was shown that Doomsday could be cut by a regular sword. After all physics says he couldn't have been pushing with much force as force is determined by mass times acceleration.

Again, be consistent.

It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword.

Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword.

Originally posted by h1a8
It wasn't shown that DD could be cut by a regular sword.

Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

My standards? No such thing.

Originally posted by h1a8
My standards? No such thing.

Did you really think admitting to having no standards was a good thing?

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Tbh SB Thor could have soloed the BvS Trinity imo. He takes this.

Tell the devil on your shoulder to stop telling you lies....imo thors feats are good BUT i think its getting exagerrated...so all of a sudden thor will beat superman,WW and (batman)?? ALONE??

Originally posted by The Spectre+
Tell the devil on your shoulder to stop telling you lies....imo thors feats are good BUT i think its getting exagerrated...so all of a sudden thor will beat superman,WW and (batman)?? ALONE??

Originally posted by Silent Master
Did you really think admitting to having no standards was a good thing?

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't own any standards.
I use logic and reasoning. The logic I use is universal and correct, its not a standard of mine.

Originally posted by h1a8
I don't own any standards.
I use logic and reasoning. The logic I use is universal and correct, its not a standard of mine.

Great, so standards is another word you don't know the meaning of.

Just wanted to bring this back up

Originally posted by Silent Master
Using your standards for evidence, yes it was.

The standard I was using was RL Physics. IOW, "logic and reason".

Originally posted by h1a8
My standards? No such thing.

By admitting that he has no standards for judging evidence, h1 is basically admitting his criteria for judging evidence is variable.

Which is something I believe we all knew, but it's nice of h1 to confirm it.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Great, so standards is another word you don't know the meaning of.

Your words imply that I'm the only one that uses a particular form of logic. i.e. It's mine alone.

What type of physics should we use to quantify Thor's feat?
What is the force of a star (not heat)? How much is it? Don't give me units of energy since that's not force

Originally posted by h1a8
Applying logic and owning a standard are two different things.

Your words imply that I'm the only one that uses a particular form of logic. i.e. It's mine alone.

What type of physics should we use to quantify Thor's feat?
What is the force of a star (not heat)? How much is it? Don't give me units of energy since that's not force

I never said you "owned" anything. nice try.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I never said you "owned" anything. nice try.

"Your" implies ownership

Originally posted by h1a8
"Your" implies ownership

You infering something doesn't mean that is what was implied. "your standards" just means the standards you're using. it doesn't imply anything.

I thought you were smart?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You infering something doesn't mean that is what was implied. "your standards" just means the standards you're using. it doesn't imply anything.

I thought you were smart?

There aren't any other standards of measurement though.
How else would you quantify the amount of force a star emits when stars don't emit much force at all? I'm all ears.

nothing doomsday can do except lose