Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm going to let you in on a secret. neutron starts exist in real life and scientists have actually measured their energy output. Now I know this is new information for you, so I'm going to give you some time to come terms with it.You're welcome.
Full force of a star has multiple possible meanings
1. Full temperature of a star
2. Full energy of a star
3. Full force of a star (physics definition of force)
2. Is false since we clearly see the star didn’t extinguish
3. Since stars don’t output a lot of force and we see Thor getting hit with a heat beam then we can rule this one out too.
Therefore 1. must be true.
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
More math and science stuff. Video in the link
Etri specifically said the "FULL force of a Star". He emphasized what Thor was just about to endure.
The fact that there is debate as to what happened, when it was literally on film and verbally clarified is impressive even by KMC standards. Hopefully in the next movie, when Thor is about to do something, subtitles will appear clarifying the details of the feat down to the nearest 0.001 decimal. Only for H1 to be like "NOPE! They didn't round it up correctly, no bueno!"
Originally posted by The Spectre+Concentrated by watching the movie with my eyes. FULL FORCE based on the movie as well from Eitri's mouth. Either way there are some lowballing ****tards trying their best mental gymnastics to make it look less impressive. What wording would you prefer my lord, Concentrated or Full Force? Either works for me.
OH!! so now its "concentrated"? whatever happend to "full"?
The funny thing is if Superman had survived the same feat as Thor with the "Full Force of a Star" , H1 would be massively pushing and glorifying that feat, even more so than how impressive is actually is.
Since it isnt one of his favorite characters, he is doing his best to low ball the feat lulz. Classic H1. 😬
Originally posted by InhumanYah, well on the plus side the entire forum knows that H1 is basically just a troll so it's all good. No one takes him seriously.
The funny thing is if Superman had survived the same feat as Thor with the "Full Force of a Star" , H1 would be massively pushing and glorifying that feat, even more so than how impressive is actually is.
Since it isnt one of his favorite characters, he is doing his best to low ball the feat lulz. Classic H1. 😬
Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Yah, well on the plus side the entire forum knows that H1 is basically just a troll so it's all good. No one takes him seriously.
I like how he claimed to have seen the video and that it proved him right. only to run away when I asked him to post how much energy the clip said was in the beam that hit Thor.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Etri specifically said the "FULL force of a Star". He emphasized what Thor was just about to endure.The fact that there is debate as to what happened, when it was literally on film and verbally clarified is impressive even by KMC standards. Hopefully in the next movie, when Thor is about to do something, subtitles will appear clarifying the details of the feat down to the nearest 0.001 decimal. Only for H1 to be like "NOPE! They didn't round it up correctly, no bueno!"
Rage use logic here.
You do know what “FULL” means right?
1. Couldn’t mean full energy since the star still had plenty of energy left
2. Couldn’t mean full “FORCE” (physics definition) since that would make the feat shit since stars don’t emit much push forces.
Thus Etri must have meant full temperature.
Originally posted by InhumanI wouldn’t. I’m one of the earliest members here and I HAVE ALWAYS STATED that energy projection durability has nothing to do with blunt force durability. You can ask any veteran kmcer.
The funny thing is if Superman had survived the same feat as Thor with the "Full Force of a Star" , H1 would be massively pushing and glorifying that feat, even more so than how impressive is actually is.
Since it isnt one of his favorite characters, he is doing his best to low ball the feat lulz. Classic H1. 😬