I posted this in another thread. I dont pretend to be an expert on Neutron stars so I dont know if its right but sounds good to me.
I posted this in another thread. I dont pretend to be an expert on Neutron stars so I dont know if its right but sounds good to me.
Originally posted by Silent MasterIt was energy in the form of heat, which can be translated to temperature. So again, it’s irrelevant to withstanding blunt force trauma.
I like how he claimed to have seen the video and that it proved him right. only to run away when I asked him to post how much energy the clip said was in the beam that hit Thor.
It could have been infinite heat energy and can still get koed easily by DD
Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
I posted this in another thread. I dont pretend to be an expert on Neutron stars so I dont know if its right but sounds good to me.
I reposted that here. h1 claims to have watched all 12 minutes of the video in under 4 minutes and that it backs up his claim that the neutron star feat is less impressive than Superman's nuke feat.
IOW: H1 is more biased than quan.
Originally posted by h1a8
I wouldn’t. I’m one of the earliest members here and I HAVE ALWAYS STATED that energy projection durability has nothing to do with blunt force durability. You can ask any veteran kmcer.
You joined KMC only a year before I did.
Also being that close to a Neutron Star>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>being as close Superman was to the world machine.