Superman (Justice League) Vs. Hulk beating Thanos

Originally posted by Psychotron
Superman has much better feats than Hulk and an unarmed Thor, so what's your point? Also, we never actually saw Thanos and Thor fight before he got Stormbreaker. We don't really know if Thor was stomped of if he managed to hold his own.

Unlikely, Thanos is not much stronger, if at all, and he has no way to keep up with Superman's speed.

In an actual fight even a small difference in speed is key, never mind a situation where one guy is thousands of times faster than the other.

Not strength feats. No strength feat portrayed by Superman can't be replicated by Hulk.

Lol, what are you saying? That Thor was able to cope Thanos? If that was the case, he wouldn't have need to almost suicide in order to get Stormbreaker. Thor hell as sure got stomped!

Agree to disagree. Thanos has to the moment better strength feats than Superman. As i said, Superman oscillates on the same strength level as Hulk.

If you want to claim that Superman will never stop running then he MIGHT win. But in a fair and realistic fight, Superman won't do that. Superman will eventually lower his guard, as he always does, and will get neck snapped by Thanos.

When we debate fights, specially fights like this in where both characters pertain to other universes, we try to make them as realistic as possible. Hell as sure you are allowed to speculate on the extremes (like Superman running forever) but that's pretty much unrealistic.

You are obviously a Thanos Fanboi and just making things up. Now Hulk can do whatever Superman did? Based on what? Your entitre Thanos strength argument is he beat up the Hulk?

Originally posted by WolvesofBabylon
You are obviously a Thanos Fanboi and just making things up. Now Hulk can do whatever Superman did? Based on what? Your entitre Thanos strength argument is he beat up the Hulk?

You are obviously a Superman fanboy!

Well, stopping and killing a 600ton+ beast with one punch without much effort hell as sure puts Hulk in par with Superman strengthwise.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Not strength feats. No strength feat portrayed by Superman can't be replicated by Hulk.

Lol, what are you saying? That Thor was able to cope Thanos? If that was the case, he wouldn't have need to almost suicide in order to get Stormbreaker. Thor hell as sure got stomped!

Agree to disagree. Thanos has to the moment better strength feats than Superman. As i said, Superman oscillates on the same strength level as Hulk.

If you want to claim that Superman will never stop running then he MIGHT win. But in a fair and realistic fight, Superman won't do that. Superman will eventually lower his guard, as he always does, and will get neck snapped by Thanos.

When we debate fights, specially fights like this in where both characters pertain to other universes, we try to make them as realistic as possible. Hell as sure you are allowed to speculate on the extremes (like Superman running forever) but that's pretty much unrealistic.

Superman has strength feats like the Singularity and the World Engine feats, which shit all over Hulk. Then there are things like casually pulling an ice breaker and tectonic plates that put Hulk to shame.

No, I said we don't know how much effort Thanos had to put into beating Thor.

No, he doesn't. Feel free to provide some. Overpowering Hulk isn't more impressive than the feats I listed above since Hulk himself has nothing even remotely comparable.

Who's talking about running? Have you ever been in a fight or at least watched one? Have you ever heard of dodging, punching and counter-punching? Those take speed. Stop making shit up.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Superman has strength feats like the Singularity and the World Engine feats, which shit all over Hulk. Then there are things like casually pulling an ice breaker and tectonic plates that put Hulk to shame.

No, I said we don't know how much effort Thanos had to put into beating Thor.

No, he doesn't. Feel free to provide some. Overpowering Hulk isn't more impressive than the feats I listed above since Hulk himself has nothing even remotely comparable.

Who's talking about running? Have you ever been in a fight or at least watched one? Have you ever heard of dodging, punching and counter-punching? Those take speed. Stop making shit up.

Singularity?...Tectonic plates? Which Superman are we talking here dude?

Based on a news paper report from BVS for the tectonic plate feat. However its not accepted by many because it was not a feat shown on screen.

The world engine, ice ship and building feats are legit as they were done on screen and he has lip service statement by Batman saying he is strong than a planet.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You are obviously a Superman fanboy!

Well, stopping and killing a 600ton+ beast with one punch without much effort hell as sure puts Hulk in par with Superman strengthwise.

Force equals change in momentum over change in time. It took Hulk more than 3 seconds to stop the thing. It wasnt instant. Superman and Zod knocking each other thru buildings where the steel beams collapse like tissue paper.

Also you can't take a character's best strength feat and transfer it to all other showings. Characters operate at different levels at different times in fiction.

Gladiator once busted a planet. Then later hit Colossus (with no effect). So did Colossus tank planet busting forces?

Thanos is stronger than Hulk and Thor. But that doesn't mean he is stronger than Superman. And if he is then the speed advantage would make that irrelevant.

Originally posted by h1a8
Force equals change in momentum over change in time. It took Hulk more than 3 seconds to stop the thing. It wasnt instant. Superman and Zod knocking each other thru buildings where the steel beams collapse like tissue paper.

Also you can't take a character's best strength feat and transfer it to all other showings. Characters operate at different levels at different times in fiction.

Gladiator once busted a planet. Then later hit Colossus (with no effect). So did Colossus tank planet busting forces?

Thanos is stronger than Hulk and Thor. But that doesn't mean he is stronger than Superman. And if he is then the speed advantage would make that irrelevant.

Irrelevant. Chitauri metal》》》Some steel beams.

Thanos》Superman.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Singularity?...Tectonic plates? Which Superman are we talking here dude?

Cavill's. Have you actually seen these movies or are you just shitposting?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Cavill's. Have you actually seen these movies or are you just shitposting?

Show me Superman moving a Tectonic Plate PLEASEE!

And if you mean the Newspaper strip then PLEASE! To take that as evidence is irresponsible!!! Or do you believe everything you read on Newspaper?

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Show me Superman moving a Tectonic Plate PLEASEE!

And if you mean the Newspaper strip then PLEASE! To take that as evidence is irresponsible!!! Or do you believe everything you read on Newspaper?

The paper was there for the audience, son. And considering he has casually towed an icebreaker it's not a stretch.

Originally posted by Psychotron
The paper was there for the audience, son. And considering he has casually towed an icebreaker it's not a stretch.

A hyperbole. Nothing really to back it up. Hulk cant move a piece of Ice. Nahh

Thanos tagging Superman makes about as much sense as Thanos slipping into the ocean from continental drift.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
A hyperbole. Nothing really to back it up. Hulk cant move a piece of Ice. Nahh

Ah, no? It's written in a factual manner.

I said ICEBREAKER. Those weigh thousands of tons and Superman was easily towing one.

Lol at the comparison of Lokis durability vs supermans.

Superman fell at beyond the speed of sound through a mountain and into the ground with zero ill effects. Loki was smashed into a marble floor from a height of 3 meters 5 times with a force that only did 1 foot of rubble damage from the impact. And was incapacitated.

Nigga please.

Originally posted by Juk3n
Lol at the comparison of Lokis durability vs supermans.

Superman fell at beyond the speed of sound through a mountain and into the ground with zero ill effects. Loki was smashed into a marble floor from a height of 3 meters 5 times with a force that only did 1 foot of rubble damage from the impact. And was incapacitated.

Nigga please.

Who in this thread is comparing Loki's durability to Superman?

Originally posted by Psychotron
Ah, no? It's written in a factual manner.

Something written in a newspaper doesnt make it fact.

Besides forum rules are On Screen Feats Only.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Something written in a newspaper doesnt make it fact.

Besides forum rules are On Screen Feats Only.

In real life that's true. When it's in a movie it's to convey certain information to the audience.

So I guess we don't things like Banner trying to kill himself and Hulk spitting out the bullet then.

Let hulk ragdoll steppenwolf (the uncle of darkseid) the way superman did, only then is he worthy of a challenge.
As for thanos, supes defeated doomsday while LOW ON RESERVES. I can bet my pants thanos will not survive a match with DD without the gaunlet.

Originally posted by Psychotron
Ah, no? It's written in a factual manner.

I said ICEBREAKER. Those weigh thousands of tons and Superman was easily towing one.

And Hulk cant do that? He stopped a Leviathan with ONE hand without even struggling.