Thanos vs Avengers

Started by Silent Master11 pages
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Just did

No you didn't, stop lying and actually provide the rule that states winning is via death unless otherwise stated by the OP.

Originally posted by Silent Master
No you didn't, stop lying and actually provide the rule that states winning is via death unless otherwise stated by the OP.

Okay, won't waste my time with a useless/irrelevant topic which isn't of concern to this Thread.

Thor never defeated Thanos, and that's the bottom line.

You trying to change what constitutes a victory is extremely relevant to the thread.

Here is Darth saying that you don't need to die in order to lose a fight

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Lol How was that a surprise attack? Thanos blocked the initial blow. You really are butt hurt.

Also You dont need to die to lost a fight facepalm

Here is you claiming that unless otherwise stated by the OP, winning is determined by death. at no point in this do you say that death is just one of the ways to win. which means that you're saying it's the only way to win in this thread.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Lol, Thor appearing from nowhere and making such a fast attack.

Ain't like Thanos was expecting Thor.

[B] Last time i check, unless specified by the OP, winning is via death.

And again, half the Universe was wiped and Thanos watched the horizon whilst Thor's ass still hurt. So DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH! [/B]

Originally posted by Silent Master
You trying to change what constitutes a victory is extremely relevant to the thread.

Here is Darth saying that you don't need to die in order to lose a fight

Here is you claiming that unless otherwise stated by the OP, winning is determined by death. at no point in this do you say that death is just one of the ways to win. which means that you're saying it's the only way to win in this thread.

Well then proof that what Darth is saying is valid for defeat. Cause no rule states that driving a weapon through someone's chest is defeat.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well then proof that what Darth is saying is valid for defeat. Cause no rule states that driving a weapon through someone's chest is defeat.

Back up your claim that death is the only way to win.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Back up your claim that death is the only way to win.

Back up your claim that Thor defeated Thanos.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Back up your claim that Thor defeated Thanos.

Me and Darth are two different people.

Now back up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Me and Darth are two different people.

Now back up your claim.

You are supporting Darth's claim that Thor won the fight. So now prove it.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You are supporting Darth's claim that Thor won the fight. So now prove it.

Even if I was supporting him, that doesn't make it my claim, let me guess. you're so scared of Darth making you look like a fool that you don't have the courage to question him on his claims.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Even if I was supporting him, that doesn't make it my claim, let me guess. you're so scared of Darth making you look like a fool that you don't have the courage to question him on his claims.

The moment you support someone's claim it makes it yours too dummy.

So prove why you belief Darth Thor's claim.

Why should i be afraid of questioning Darth Thor's beliefs?

So I was right, you're too scared to challenge Darth over his claims. just like you're too scared to back up the claims you've made in regards to death being the only way t win.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So I was right, you're too scared to challenge Darth over his claims. just like you're too scared to back up the claims you've made in regards to death being the only way t win.

Well am challenging you to defend your claim. I can challenge Darth after you.

Or are you saying you are incapable of backing your claims?

Quote the claim I made and I'll back it up.

If death was the only way to win a fight then there wouldn't be any winners in the UFC. And in a street fight, you could beat someone to an inch of their life but apparently that won't be considered a win in Josh's book.

Originally posted by FrothByte
If death was the only way to win a fight then there wouldn't be any winners in the UFC. And in a street fight, you could beat someone to an inch of their life but apparently that won't be considered a win in Josh's book.

Well you'd have to proof that Thor can actually beat Thanos to such point.

And, ofcourse it would be a win. I can admit i made a mistake in my original thoughts.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Well you'd have to proof that Thor can actually beat Thanos to such point.

And, ofcourse it would be a win. I can admit i made a mistake in my original thoughts.

A win is won in two ways: One is when an opponent is unable to continue, either via KO, death, too much injury, etc.

The other is when an opponent doesn't want to continue, either via tap out or retreat.

In Thor and Thanos' last fight, Thanos retreated.

Originally posted by FrothByte
A win is won in two ways: One is when an opponent is unable to continue, either via KO, death, too much injury, etc.

The other is when an opponent doesn't want to continue, either via tap out or retreat.

In Thor and Thanos' last fight, Thanos retreated.

Okay, i will accept the first one.

The second one however, that would all depend on the circumstances dude.

If Thanos would have retreated for fear of Thor, then you'd have a valid point.

Yet, Thanos didn't.

Thanos could have very well killed Thor right there if he so would have wished. He had the gauntlet in the end, and could have very well used it in several ways to obliterate him.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Okay, i will accept the first one.

The second one however, that would all depend on the circumstances dude.

If Thanos would have retreated for fear of Thor, then you'd have a valid point.

Yet, Thanos didn't.

Thanos could have very well killed Thor right there if he so would have wished. He had the gauntlet in the end, and could have very well used it in several ways to obliterate him.

That's simply your theory. There are many reasons why a retreat is smarter than continuing the fight, however a retreat is still a retreat.

Thanos had an axe in his chest, obviously paining him and he didn't have the stength to overpower Thor and take it out... otherwise he would have done so. He then retreated. You can attach whatever theory you want to it but bottom line is, Thanos was the one who was at a disadvantage and he retreated.

Originally posted by FrothByte
That's simply your theory. There are many reasons why a retreat is smarter than continuing the fight, however a retreat is still a retreat.

Thanos had an axe in his chest, obviously paining him and he didn't have the stength to overpower Thor and take it out... otherwise he would have done so. He then retreated. You can attach whatever theory you want to it but bottom line is, Thanos was the one who was at a disadvantage and he retreated.

The context of the scene doesn't support you theory mr. Froth. If you think it does, then think again.

Thanos had the IG in his hand, with which he wiped half the universe!

He could have very well snapped his fingers and erase both SB and Thor, then heal himself, and erase half the universe all the same!

Or he could have reverted time, and prepare a better offensive. If you think Thanos retreated due to FEAR, then boy you don't really understand what happened in Infinity War

At the end of the fight Thor was uninjured and Thanos had an axe in his chest