Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
but neither you hasn't prove these dreaming universes not as big as main universe,
I've asked you a simple question multiple times:
Why would people create a full fledged universe simply to torture themselves?
Can you answer that, or will you simply just keep repeating yourself and try to apply a large non sequitur to your argument? Why is it the same size? Because they're dreams? Why are dreams the same size?
You're using a completely "featless" universe to try and compare it in sheer scope to the main universe. We don't know the dimensions of these things. All we know is they've been referred to as bubble universes, and they don't show infinite depth like a real universe.
It's up to you to show those specific universes are fully universal in scope.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
actually in spectre,had pinpoint that everyone is god/creator to create our own universe like god himself
https://i.imgur.com/AZuwuls.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/tKL27iT.jpg
You really think Hal saying that God dreams up the universe helps to prove that random homos in Hell create universes rivaling his creation?
And those scans follow the line of logic that every action a creature does spins off a parallel universe. That's fine, but that's taking a pre-existing universe and splitting it to mold to the choice. And this takes place in REALITY, not in a spirit realm devoid of new choices and old universes.
The difference is, in Hell, they don't have a choice to spin off a new universe based on their actions. Their actions are done, all they have is thoughts to mold a universe out of. Their current thoughts, or past thoughts are creating a Hell to torture them for all eternity. They aren't physical beings that interact with other physical beings and effecting a fixed "reality."
They're essentially in a void creating "universes" out of their own thoughts.
VS
All matter already exists, but a universe splits off to account for a being that chose to murder a child instead of letting it walk home from school.
Do you see the difference?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
joker need mxy power to achieve emperor joker this event,and later superman also is battling joker at physical level,he only once go to mental is at the story end,superman pinoint joker obsession to batman.so this also just prove my point,this not just need willpowr but also raw power
and about "bubble" i haven been explained(spectre,and also dematteis his other comics)
Bro...
You want me answer this seriously?
Superman isn't as powerful Emperor Joker, and even if he was, Emperor Joker has powers that transcend simple raw might to warp all reality...
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
we didn't assume he smashing entire hell,but his smashing endless realities,
Which is why the shards of Hell are there. You made a point out of this earlier and I assumed you were just confused?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
well,superman power relative to his emotion,this been said by byrne,and also this issue writer dematteis also writting superman where is thy sting,and in that story,superman also when he remember lois,then he wreckaged universes death,similar plot
But it's not even close to the same thing as what you're implying happened. You went from "dreams" to "This is also a good feat so that proves he did this."
The feats aren't even close to comparable in power going by your interpretation first off. Second, it's not even close to the same thing.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
i mean hell contain infinite universes,,and superman smashing one of hell infinite universes,because every thought/dream creating a same real universe,and dreams within dreams,realities within realities,so essentially,is really infinite within infinite.superman smashing one of infinite universes didn't surprising.(and if you considering like timelines,dimensions etc,will be huge infinite within infinite Hierarchies.
I'm like 80 percent sure you're trolling now. It went up from 42%.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
"this whole dreamverse......was inadvertently created by him(atom)"
"but....how can we be alive in a dream?it feels so real!"
"for all practical purposes it is REAL!"
"dreams within dreams"
"realities within realities"
those sentences all i quote from comic
and i use a marvel comic example because is the same writer,this i have been said before.
But why is it the same thing as creating a landscape in Hell for yourself? Did it happen in Hell?
You see to think every single dream is exactly the same no matter the surrounding context around it. But yes, Inception level dreams involving realities within realities and other functioning beings is a vastly different set of circumstances than people in Hell torturing themselves away from the rest of reality in bubble universes.
Hence why I don't want to search up the context because I doubt there's any correlation besides the word "Dream."
Unless Superman is now being stated to have smashed fully fledged universes - that they themselves had other fully fledged universes within themselves - in an infinite capacity?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
and neron brought superman is "absolute nothing","my thoughts bleed out of me" "soon to be erased" "i become nothing"and also again mind you this is the same writer,and background,description is similar to spectre's,and neron pinoint superman will be erased.
And Spectre was in the Void of all Voids sent there by Parallax, not in Hell/Superman called Neron's universe was the essence of nothingness. It brings doubt that it's the same thing. Spectre even acknowledges that there's other voids to repeat myself.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
spectre said"i'm connected to the logoz that god merged me with",mean this is require raw power.
He broke his constraints and realized what he actually was, then he realized he was simply greater than everything in creation due to having part of God within him, and was viewing Parallax from that perspective.
I have no doubt that Spectre could have broken out due to raw power, but the story made it seem to be more than that. More metaphysical, and not due to sheer might. Same with Superman for that matter. Love is powerful enough to break all boundaries. It's why Lois reached him, and it's why Superman broke out.
I'm not doubting the power required to do something of this nature, but rather if Superman DID use raw power to break out due to the nature of everything. And I think it's fair to say that the only thing stronger than Superman is his willpower.
I don't think anything there was a physical feat, as nothing was actually "real" as in physical, but I do believe it applicable to his mental fortitude. Do you understand?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
and i never said about superman physically smashing it,i said superman has the power to smashing it.
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
superman literally withstanding erase from existence's dream(all universes beginning),and smashing endless realities/universes from all universes beginning point.a beastly feat,both for durable and strength(or maybe plus speed,he literally flying through from a place below all universes/all universes beginning)
Also, so Superman didn't physically smash it is what you're saying? So, how do you attribute it purely to raw power?
Originally posted by qwertyuiop1998
and btw,you scan is just another prove to support hells/universe is conduit by our own thought.and also this is dematteis always trying to say,in spectre,he pinpoint everyone/thing is god,god is everyone/thing,and in man of tomorrow,demotteis trying to explain neron/satan is our own negative thoughts/emotion/dream like you scan said
""there are many hells.and if each one of them is formed by our own perceptions(and which superman just experienced)
"there are many hells....as there are neronS"
"just a dream.....like creation itself"
"he's the darkness in men's minds .....given breath and form"
"that soon he'll find the one REALITY i won't be able to resist"
https://i.imgur.com/0oUwVZr.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8mO3kIP.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/MYvqG2w.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/BtGTU2I.jpg
That doesn't go against anything I've stated.