Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilSo why won’t you answer the question. You can always tell how badly someone’s trying to be biased when you will do anything but explain yourself or anywhere any questions.
Hulk was less scared of sultur than he was of thanos, and thanos is only like three captain America's strong.
Thanos is stronger than Hulk who is much stronger than Cap. You’re basically retarded at this point try to keep up and at least pretend to have an actual point.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilThey weren’t warriors. It’s like judging humans from the farmers slaughtered as opposed to the trainees warriors. For ****s sake you’re dumb.
I didn't say living, but based on the way the refugees were reacting, i'd say the average asgardian is weaker than the average skelegardian
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I didn't say living, but based on the way the refugees were reacting, i'd say the average asgardian is weaker than the average skelegardian
So you think dead Asgardians who have been desiccating for thousands of years aren't any more brittle than living Asgardians? Ok... sure.
Originally posted by FrothByteif anything, I'd say the skelegardian were less brittle than the living asgardians. They were powered by the eternal flame and were posing a huge threat to the civilians.
So you think dead Asgardians who have been desiccating for thousands of years aren't any more brittle than living Asgardians? Ok... sure.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
if anything, I'd say the skelegardian were less brittle than the living asgardians. They were powered by the eternal flame and were posing a huge threat to the civilians.
You mean unarmed civilians mostly made up of women and children being afraid of armed undead warriors? Gee i wonder why...
It's not just warriors vs farmers. Hela took out an army and the warriors three with the absolute minimalist of effort but thor was able to put up something of a decent fight even before he turned on his god mode. Odin's kin are ridiculously stronger than the rest of asgard.
Faerora, namek, zod and KAL, on the other hand, all had similiar physicality. We can hold the average kryptonian to their standard, while the same cannot be said with asgard and it's elites
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
It's not just warriors vs farmers. Hela took out an army and the warriors three with the absolute minimalist of effort but thor was able to put up something of a decent fight even before he turned on his god mode. Odin's kin are ridiculously stronger than the rest of asgard.Faerora, namek, zod and KAL, on the other hand, all had similiar physicality. We can hold the average kryptonian to their standard, while the same cannot be said with asgard and it's elites
Err... no. Namek and Faora never showed the ability to fly, shoot laser beams or remove their mask without getting KO'd.
Zod never showed the kind of speed Superman did in JL.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
But zod, faora, and namek were all as strong and durable as superman. They had less control/expierence with their powers, but they were on kal's level.
No they weren't. If they were then Superman should never have been able to fight off Faora and Namek together.
If Zod was every bit as strong, durable and fast as him then Superman should have easily lost their fight since Zod is trained and has way more fighting experience than he.
Originally posted by FrothByte
No they weren't. If they were then Superman should never have been able to fight off Faora and Namek together.If Zod was every bit as strong, durable and fast as him then Superman should have easily lost their fight since Zod is trained and has way more fighting experience than he.
He didn't? Superman was getting batted around despite his flight advantage. It wasn't till he broke faora's mask that they left.
Except did never trained with powers. and even with his training and superior genes, he lost to a nerd before his planet blew up. Zod's training and skill didn't amount to a hill of beans. It was His power that made him formidable.