Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Forget about it! I am going with the heavy evidence. I thought i could use the light evidence to swade you into reason but it seems it won't.SB>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common sword.
SB at full force and sorrounded in lightning could only PARTIALLY penetrate Thanos!!!
Thanos >>> Kurse. It's clear.
1. A long, pointed sword will always have an easier time penetrating deeper than a hack from an axe. This is just plain common sense.
2. SB was thrown from a distance whereas Kurse was stabbed point blank.
3. SB had to overcome a full blast from the IG before even hitting Thanos.
Your so-called "heavy evidence" is so stupid that it pretty much verges on troll-territory.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. A long, pointed sword will always have an easier time penetrating deeper than a hack from an axe. This is just plain common sense.2. SB was thrown from a distance whereas Kurse was stabbed point blank.
3. SB had to overcome a full blast from the IG before even hitting Thanos.
Your so-called "heavy evidence" is so stupid that it pretty much verges on troll-territory.
1. This is Stormbreaker against a common sword. Not a common axe against a common sword!
What the heck!
2. Stormbreaker was thrown by an enraged Thor. Loki didn't even struggled to impale Kurse.
Thor > Loki strengthwise.
Furthermore, SB was surrounded in lightning. An explosion could even be noticed when it hit Thanos!
3. A laser or energy attack has no mass. Which means objects don't get decelerated or stopped by such.
It's OBVIOUS that Thanos is more durable. EVEN A KID COULD SEE IT
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. This is Stormbreaker against a common sword. Not a common axe against a common sword!What the heck!
2. Stormbreaker was thrown by an enraged Thor. Loki didn't even struggled to impale Kurse.
Thor > Loki strengthwise.
Furthermore, SB was surrounded in lightning. An explosion could even be noticed when it hit Thanos!
3. A laser or energy attack has no mass. Which means objects don't get decelerated or stopped by such.
[B] It's OBVIOUS that Thanos is more durable. EVEN A KID COULD SEE IT
[/B]
1. OK little boy, let me explain this to you real slow so you can understand. SB has a wide blade that's only several inches long in depth before it becomes a bulbous head. Once that blade penetrates it will only penetrate that few inches till the bulbous axe head acts as a stopper, unless the target is extremely not durable.
The sword blade was a few FEET long. Sharp and pointed with no bulbous protrusion to act as a stopper.
2. Again, there's no proof that Loki didn't struggle. We don't see how Loki plunged that sword since he was hidden in the scene. Please stop making things up.
3. So then why does Thor get knocked back by IM's repulsor blasts? Why did Thor's lightning slam Thanos on his face? Why did Loki's scepter blast knock him off his feet when Cap redirected it at him?
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. OK little boy, let me explain this to you real slow so you can understand. SB has a wide blade that's only several inches long in depth before it becomes a bulbous head. Once that blade penetrates it will only penetrate that few inches till the bulbous axe head acts as a stopper, unless the target is extremely not durable.The sword blade was a few FEET long. Sharp and pointed with no bulbous protrusion to act as a stopper.
2. Again, there's no proof that Loki didn't struggle. We don't see how Loki plunged that sword since he was hidden in the scene. Please stop making things up.
3. So then why does Thor get knocked back by IM's repulsor blasts? Why did Thor's lightning slam Thanos on his face? Why did Loki's scepter blast knock him off his feet when Cap redirected it at him?
1. OMG you are actually comparing a common sword with Stormbreaker!! Your bias has grown inmensely Froth!
I know that a pointy edge is better penetrating than a bigger surface one.
Yet you are forgetting that 1. Stormbreaker is moving at insanely high speeds 2. Stormbreaker is sorrounded in Electricity. 3. Stormbreaker is being thrown by Thor whose strength >>>>>>>>>>>>> Loki!!
2. Bring evidence that Loki struggled. Cause i never heard him moan or even complain on the difficulty of the task.
All i saw was a sword crossing Kurse with 0 difficulty.
3. Lightning is flow of electrons. Electrons do possess mass.
Lasers dont. They do push objects but it's effect is almost none.
The things you mention are just Sci-Fi, not real. Blasters shouldn't be pushing people away. And we don't have feats for IG's blast.
Again, SB feat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sword feat
Get over it Froth. Damn you are beginning to sound stupid.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. OMG you are actually comparing a common sword with Stormbreaker!! Your bias has grown inmensely Froth!I know that a pointy edge is better penetrating than a bigger surface one.
Yet you are forgetting that 1. Stormbreaker is moving at insanely high speeds 2. Stormbreaker is sorrounded in Electricity. 3. Stormbreaker is being thrown by Thor whose strength >>>>>>>>>>>>> Loki!!
2. Bring evidence that Loki struggled. Cause i never heard him moan or even complain on the difficulty of the task.
All i saw was a sword crossing Kurse with 0 difficulty.
3. Lightning is flow of electrons. Electrons do possess mass.
Lasers dont. They do push objects but it's effect is almost none.
The things you mention are just Sci-Fi, not real. Blasters shouldn't be pushing people away. And we don't have feats for IG's blast.
[B] Again, SB feat >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sword feat
Get over it Froth. Damn you are beginning to sound stupid. [/B]
1. Electricity doesn't help in penetration capabilities. For all the powers that SB has, I don't recall SB having the power to cut and stab even with it's blunt head.
2. Nuh uh, this is not how proof works. You're the one who claimed Loki didn't struggle, therefore you need to prove it. I never claimed whether he struggled or didn't struggle, I'm saying we don't know. So if you want to claim he didn't struggle then prove it.
3. Again, why did IM's repulsor blasts knock Thor off his feet?
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. Electricity doesn't help in penetration capabilities. For all the powers that SB has, I don't recall SB having the power to cut and stab even with it's blunt head.2. Nuh uh, this is not how proof works. You're the one who claimed Loki didn't struggle, therefore you need to prove it. I never claimed whether he struggled or didn't struggle, I'm saying we don't know. So if you want to claim he didn't struggle then prove it.
3. Again, why did IM's repulsor blasts knock Thor off his feet?
1. A lightning can burst open concrete!
Stormbreaker is moving faster, at greater force, and sorrounded in electricity which results in an explosion.
Stop being biased.
2. Watch the scene. No signs of struggle. Pretty clear.
3. It's called PIS.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. A lightning can burst open concrete!Stormbreaker is moving faster, at greater force, and sorrounded in electricity which results in an explosion.
Stop being biased.
2. Watch the scene. No signs of struggle. Pretty clear.
3. It's called PIS.
1. So you're basically claiming that SB has the power to cut and stab through things even with its blunt head?
2. I watched the scene. We don't even see Loki as the sword punches through. So again, please show your proof that he wasn't struggling.
3. No, it's called consistency. Pretty much every single energy attack we've seen in the MCU carries a certain amount of physical force. From Destroyer's eyebeams throwing around cars to Cap getting knocked down from a Chitauti laser to Thor getting thrown back by IM's repulsors. So if you want to claim otherwise burden of proof is on you.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. So you're basically claiming that SB has the power to cut and stab through things even with its blunt head?2. I watched the scene. We don't even see Loki as the sword punches through. So again, please show your proof that he wasn't struggling.
3. No, it's called consistency. Pretty much every single energy attack we've seen in the MCU carries a certain amount of physical force. From Destroyer's eyebeams throwing around cars to Cap getting knocked down from a Chitauti laser to Thor getting thrown back by IM's repulsors. So if you want to claim otherwise burden of proof is on you.
1. Bring evidence the edge is blunt.
Well it was able to impale Thanos who had already bounced Nebula's swords and explosions.
2. He wasn't shown because it was irrelevant for the scene. The sword went clean thorugh with 0 problems. If you want to claim there was a struggle, PROVE IT.
3. Even if you are right. Stormbreaker was moving at fast and strong. The Beam wasn't decelerating it.
And again Stormbreaker >>>> Common sword
Unless you can prove that common sword > Stomrbreaker, you will pretty much be losing this debate one way or another
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. Bring evidence the edge is blunt.Well it was able to impale Thanos who had already bounced Nebula's swords and explosions.
2. He wasn't shown because it was irrelevant for the scene. The sword went clean thorugh with 0 problems. If you want to claim there was a struggle, PROVE IT.
3. Even if you are right. Stormbreaker was moving at fast and strong. The Beam wasn't decelerating it.
And again [B] Stormbreaker >>>> Common sword
Unless you can prove that common sword > Stomrbreaker, you will pretty much be losing this debate one way or another [/B]
1. Dude, SB has one sharp edge and one blunt edge at the opposite end. Are you claiming the entire head of SB is sharp all over?
2. No, I never claimed he struggled. I'm saying there's no way to know because we don't see Loki. So if you want to claim he didn't struggle then please provide proof. Saying "because you can't prove otherwise" is not proof.
3. Again, baseless supposition on your part. The fact that energy blasts have shown physical force means that SB still needed to overcome the IG blast BEFORE it hit Thanos.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. Dude, SB has one sharp edge and one blunt edge at the opposite end. Are you claiming the entire head of SB is sharp all over?2. No, I never claimed he struggled. I'm saying there's no way to know because we don't see Loki. So if you want to claim he didn't struggle then please provide proof. Saying "because you can't prove otherwise" is not proof.
3. Again, baseless supposition on your part. The fact that energy blasts have shown physical force means that SB still needed to overcome the IG blast BEFORE it hit Thanos.
1. What does that matter? It's pretty clear that the sharp edge wasn't fully inside. Thor had to further push SB inside Thanos.
It's pretty clear in the scene.
2. So if you aren't claiming Loki struggled what is the point then!?
Thor is stronger than Loki one way or another. And you don't even know if Loki used his full strength to penetrate Kurse.
3. Even if you manage to prove SB was slowing down (which it wasn't) it proves nothing.
SB>Sword. It was still moving fast when it hit Thanos. Still better than Loki casually penetrating Kurse.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
1. What does that matter? It's pretty clear that the sharp edge wasn't fully inside. Thor had to further push SB inside Thanos.It's pretty clear in the scene.
2. So if you aren't claiming Loki struggled what is the point then!?
Thor is stronger than Loki one way or another. And you don't even know if Loki used his full strength to penetrate Kurse.
3. Even if you manage to prove SB was slowing down (which it wasn't) it proves nothing.
SB>Sword. It was still moving fast when it hit Thanos. Still better than Loki casually penetrating Kurse.
1. The entire sharp edge was inside Thanos. It was the blunt parts that were still sticking out.
2. I'm making a point that you're making stuff up that you can't back up. If you can't back it up then stop saying Loki didn't struggle.
3. See point #2. Stop making stuff up.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. The entire sharp edge was inside Thanos. It was the blunt parts that were still sticking out.2. I'm making a point that you're making stuff up that you can't back up. If you can't back it up then stop saying Loki didn't struggle.
3. See point #2. Stop making stuff up.
1. No it wasn't. Thor further pushed it. The scene is very explicit.
2. One way or another Thor is stronger. Point is irrelevant.
3. SB >> Sword, stop making stuff up.
Originally posted by FrothByte
1. A long, pointed sword will always have an easier time penetrating deeper than a hack from an axe. This is just plain common sense.2. SB was thrown from a distance whereas Kurse was stabbed point blank.
3. SB had to overcome a full blast from the IG before even hitting Thanos.
Your so-called "heavy evidence" is so stupid that it pretty much verges on troll-territory.
Good points.
saying that elf sword that went through kurse body was powerful is stupid , there is no indication in the thor movie to suggest that.
it was just a pathetic sword on the ground , Thanos is stronger , more durable , WAAAAAAY smarter and much more skillful so he is gonna stomp kurse , to say otherwise is either because of stupidity or because of some weird love for a pathetic character like kurse.
Originally posted by Single-Cell
saying that elf sword that went through kurse body was powerful is stupid , there is no indication in the thor movie to suggest that.
it was just a pathetic sword on the ground , Thanos is stronger , more durable , WAAAAAAY smarter and much more skillful so he is gonna stomp kurse , to say otherwise is either because of stupidity or because of some weird love for a pathetic character like kurse.
It's surprising that Froth is actually debating on Sword>SB. That is the last thing i thought i would hear.