Anyway if hes resurrected then he is technically dead prior to the resurrection. And if hes been cloned then the original is also dead. So theres ways for Ian to be telling the truth while still basically lying.
But if he was just coming back in holocron form then JJ would have made it clear that hes dead, but he specifically said he cant give anything away, whilst elsewhere making it clear theres a bigger baddie than Kylo in this.
Originally posted by Bashar Teghere is your big chance to prove what I said was about the movie and not people crying about it. I’ll wait because we both know you’re a moron who’s backed himself into a corner. 😂 making a meal out of a typo , further proof you’re a pathetic cuck.
still screeching and pulling your hair out over a movie?"regarded" 😂
Originally posted by ares834
Yes. According to Lucas who has also said there is no story after Episode 6. Disney has been doing what they wanted and have ignored Lucas's treatments, what he said years ago is irreverent for Disney Wars.
Why does it matter? Star Wars spans an entire galaxy with innumerable potential stories, Lucas is one man that sold off his franchise for monetary gain. Thus far Disney has done a solid job minus the barking of a minority of fanboys who are made there aren’t moar L1ght$s@b3r fights, less white characters, and who are mad they’re utilizing elements of legends. Get mad because this moving is going to be successful. The franchise doesn’t need Lucas to move on
Originally posted by Darth ThorI assumed Kylo would follow Vader's redemption arch and side with Rey to take down Snoke when I believed Snoke was going to be a major player well into ep 9, which showed a lack of originality. So when Snoke died, I cheered, cos it seemed I was wrong and we weren't getting rehashed stories.
Anyway if hes resurrected then he is technically dead prior to the resurrection. And if hes been cloned then the original is also dead. So theres ways for Ian to be telling the truth while still basically lying.But if he was just coming back in holocron form then JJ would have made it clear that hes dead, but he specifically said he cant give anything away, whilst elsewhere making it clear theres a bigger baddie than Kylo in this.
Now it's apparently Palpatine. I mean, if that happens, Kylo siding with Rey to take Palp down, it does show a clear lack of originality. Not that being unoriginal in film is an inherently bad thing, but personally I would like something newer and fresher. Keep Kylo evil I say, have him die while defiantly flipping off Rey and everything Jedi.
Who knows, maybe Palpatine will just be a force ghost or something.
Why does it matter? Star Wars spans an entire galaxy with innumerable potential stories, Lucas is one man that sold off his franchise for monetary gain. Thus far Disney has done a solid job minus the barking of a minority of fanboys who are made there aren’t moar L1ght$s@b3r fights, less white characters, and who are mad they’re utilizing elements of legends. Get mad because this moving is going to be successful. The franchise doesn’t need Lucas to move on
Interesting. But this has absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying. I’m not complaining that they ignored Lucas’s treatments; I’m merely pointing out that what he said previously is irrelevant.
Originally posted by Insane Titan
here is your big chance to prove what I said was about the movie and not people crying about it. I’ll wait because we both know you’re a moron who’s backed himself into a corner. 😂 making a meal out of a typo , further proof you’re a pathetic cuck.
Another tushy tantrum, over a movie meant for children? 😂