Originally posted by RealityWarperSo all in all you can’t prove it would work on CAS. 😂 I forgot you’re retarded enough to think it working on a weak mentally unstable version of MM is proof.
That's not how it works.You are trying to make a special pleading for CAS and a shift in the burden of proof. Two fallacies in the same bag.
A) Shifting of the Burden of Proof
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/222/Shifting-of-the-Burden-of-Proof
onus probandi
(also known as: burden of proof [general concept], burden of proof fallacy, misplaced burden of proof, shifting the burden of proof)
Description: Making a claim that needs justification, then demanding that the opponent justifies the opposite of the claim. The burden of proof is a legal and philosophical concept with differences in each domain. In everyday debate, the burden of proof typically lies with the person making the claim, but it can also lie with the person denying a well-established fact or theory. Like other non-black and white issues, there are instances where this is clearly fallacious, and those which are not as clear.
Logical Form:
Person 1 is claiming Y, which requires justification.
Person 1 demands that person 2 justify the opposite of Y.
Person 2 refuses or is unable to comply.
Therefore, Y is true.
B) Special Pleading
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/specplea.html
Taxonomy: Logical Fallacy > Informal Fallacy > Special Pleading1
Form:Rule: Xs are generally Ys.
x is an X.
x is an exception to the rule because it is I (where I is an irrelevant characteristic).
Therefore, x is not a Y.
Example:The law requires everyone to follow the speed limit and other traffic regulations, but in Suffolk County, exceptions should be made for cops and their families, police union officials say.
Police Benevolent Association president Jeff Frayler said Thursday it has been union policy to discourage Suffolk police officers from issuing tickets to fellow officers, regardless of where they work.
"Police officers have discretion whenever they stop anyone, but they should particularly extend that courtesy in the case of other police officers and their families," Frayler said in a brief telephone interview Thursday. "It is a professional courtesy."2
Analysis
Counter-Example:Police officers occasionally have to shoot and kill suspects. So, family members of police officers should never be charged with murder if they shoot and kill someone. It's a professional courtesy.
Exposition:Many rules—called "rules of thumb"—have exceptions for relevant cases. For example, many institutions, such as airlines and restaurants, have rules against people bringing animals onto their premises. However, an exception is made for blind people with seeing-eye dogs, since otherwise such people might not be able to use the facilities. A blind person is a relevant exception to the rule against animals, but some people who are not blind or otherwise disabled attempt to evade the rule. The fallacy of Special Pleading occurs when someone argues that a case is an exception to a rule based upon an irrelevant characteristic that does not qualify as an exception.
The scans have been posted hundreds of times in this forum.
I don't need to show again something that has been established for years alreadY.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's on you to fulfill the burden of proof and prove that CAS can counter Molecule Manipulation.
Your move. 😉
Why does this thread exist? Why is this thread at page 3 already? Why are some people still feeding a troll? Wait, that last question actually answers my first two questions.
Cosmic Armor Superman wins. If you took all the hyperbole and hints about Sentrys power level seriously and multiplied it with one million, you would still not come even close to the power level needed to compete with Cosmic Armor Superman.
Cosmic Armor Superman is an actual multiversal+ entity, who juggled galaxies and universes - and not some "but but Tony Stark said it"-joke RealityWarper created.
Why are some people still feeding a troll?
Cosmic Armor Superman is an actual multiversal+ entity, who juggled galaxies and universes - and not some "but but Tony Stark said it"-joke RealityWarper created.
^^^well that just provided a full day’s allowance of essential vitamins and minerals.
Good stuff.
Originally posted by Enzeru
Why does this thread exist? Why is this thread at page 3 already? Why are some people still feeding a troll? Wait, that last question actually answers my first two questions.Cosmic Armor Superman wins. If you took all the hyperbole and hints about Sentrys power level seriously and multiplied it with one million, you would still not come even close to the power level needed to compete with Cosmic Armor Superman.
Cosmic Armor Superman is an actual multiversal+ entity, who juggled galaxies and universes - and not some "but but Tony Stark said it"-joke RealityWarper created.
Boredom
Originally posted by Insane Titan
So all in all you can’t prove it would work on CAS. 😂 I forgot you’re retarded enough to think it working on a weak mentally unstable version of MM is proof.
MM wasn't weakened.
Originally posted by Enzeru
Why does this thread exist? Why is this thread at page 3 already? Why are some people still feeding a troll? Wait, that last question actually answers my first two questions.Cosmic Armor Superman wins. If you took all the hyperbole and hints about Sentrys power level seriously and multiplied it with one million, you would still not come even close to the power level needed to compete with Cosmic Armor Superman.
Cosmic Armor Superman is an actual multiversal+ entity, who juggled galaxies and universes - and not some "but but Tony Stark said it"-joke RealityWarper created.
Tony Stark is an authority in the Marvel Universe.
You are a random poster in a battle forum.