Sarah Huckabee Sanders Thrown Out Of Restaurant -former Federal Ethics Head says...

...that SHS’s tweet violates two ethics rules.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/393816-ex-white-house-ethics-chief-sarah-sanders-tweet-on-restaurant-that

Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so

— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) June 23, 2018

Sarah, I know you don’t care even a tiny little bit about the ethics rules, but using your official account for this is a clear violation of 5 CFR 2635.702(a). It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out. https://t.co/Fj6OfBAdew

— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018

Sanders used her official govt account to condemn a private business for personal reasons. Seeks to coerce business by using her office to get public to pressure it. Violates endorsements ban too, which has an obvious corollary for discouraging patronage. Misuse reg covers both.

— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018

No it doesn’t to both points you made, Walter Shaub, you lying, biased piece of shit. 😬

To both of his points, in order:

1. She did not use her public office for private gain.
2. She did not violate the endorsements ban.

This guy is not even trying to hide his bias. This is not a reach. This is just blatant lying. He’s trying to use jargon and obscure references to defame or disparage Trump’s presidency and he’s attacking his Trump’s mouthpiece to do it.

Thoughts?

FYI - I typed this with my phone while pooping. If there are mistakes, I ain’t fixing jack.

ICE should be set loose on this guy.

https://mobile.twitter.com/waltshaub/status/1010656810527789059?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

There’s no ethics rule against Sarah Sanders fans being cartoonish hypocrites in defending merchants discriminating against gay people but howling when a merchant rejects a human rights violator based on her involvement in harming babies & children. Ridicule will have to suffice.

Nah, no bias here.

If the Left didn't do things that were hypocritical then they wouldn't do anything at all

Lock her up.

A business owner is under no obligation whatsoever to sell you anything or provide you with their services.

Originally posted by samhain
A business owner is under no obligation whatsoever to sell you anything or provide you with their services.

Yet the left had no problem taking those Baker to court sorely based on their religious belief.

But at the same time turns a blind eye when does Of the Islam fate denies the same thing due to their religious belief.

You’re absolutely right though.

That baker should have been smarter about it at the end of the day. If I was against gay marriage the last thing I would be is a phucking baker/cake decorator and even if I was, I'd keep my mouth shut and rack up those pink dollars. Gay people must make up around 40% of a baker's profits.

Originally posted by samhain
That baker should have been smarter about it at the end of the day. If I was against gay marriage the last thing I would be is a phucking baker/cake decorator and even if I was, I'd keep my mouth shut and rack up those pink dollars. Gay people must make up around 40% of a baker's profits.

Not the point. They were in the right of expressing their religious right. Yet, the left condemn and demean them for their views, yet turn a blind eye when Islam was concern.

And I see you didn’t say anything about the same thing happening with the Muslims though?

I'm actually unaware of any stories about Muslim bakers refusing to sell a gay guy a donut, don't get me wrong, I'm almost certain it's happened and you're right, it's totally hypocritical. Thing with me is, I try not to get worked up with the various hypocrisies that the left generally executes. You're giving them what they want IMO.

Originally posted by dadudemon
...that SHS’s tweet violates two ethics rules.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/393816-ex-white-house-ethics-chief-sarah-sanders-tweet-on-restaurant-that

No it doesn’t to both points you made, Walter Shaub, you lying, biased piece of shit. 😬

To both of his points, in order:

1. She did not use her public office for private gain.
2. She did not violate the endorsements ban.

This guy is not even trying to hide his bias. This is not a reach. This is just blatant lying. He’s trying to use jargon and obscure references to defame or disparage Trump’s presidency and he’s attacking his Trump’s mouthpiece to do it.

Thoughts?

FYI - I typed this with my phone while pooping. If there are mistakes, I ain’t fixing jack.

Bingo. I give two shits about her being kicked out. But for this fat weasel to say it's like an atf agent pulling out his badge is f*cking retarded.

I'm glad he quit.

Originally posted by samhain
I'm actually unaware of any stories about Muslim bakers refusing to sell a gay guy a donut, don't get me wrong, I'm almost certain it's happened and you're right, it's totally hypocritical. Thing with me is, I try not to get worked up with the various hypocrisies that the left generally executes. You're giving them what they want IMO.

There is a case to pay attention to in Canada. Tranny calls up a place that does waxes, asks if they will wax trannies. The business needs to ask the manager. Manager calls the tranny back and say we leave it up to our technicians whether or not they wanna do waxes on men and the current technician is a muslim who is not comfy doing so.

Now tranny is suing.

We get to see who is higher up on the victim totem pole: muslims or mentally ill men who feel they are women. It's gonna be hard for leftists to decide. Makes me smile.

Restaurant Owner Who Booted Sanders Says Gay Employees Too Triggered By WH Press Secretary

I'd say they are butthurt, but since they are gay their butts are always probably hurting.

ZING!

Originally posted by samhain
That baker should have been smarter about it at the end of the day. If I was against gay marriage the last thing I would be is a phucking baker/cake decorator and even if I was, I'd keep my mouth shut and rack up those pink dollars. Gay people must make up around 40% of a baker's profits.

I think it was a setup.

Shattered Glass fabricating. It happened, they were all in on it.

It just doesn't make any sense otherwise. I'm Catholic. and no one would care about selling a cake to a gay couple.

Originally posted by cdtm
I think it was a setup.

Shattered Glass fabricating. It happened, they were all in on it.

It just doesn't make any sense otherwise. I'm Catholic. and no one would care about selling a cake to a gay couple.

Gay marriage wasn't even legal in the state at the time lol.

Yeah I do think a lot of these are setups. I also think the reactions they claim they had are lies. One guy from the gay couple said he was essentially in tears and hysterical over this.

That's a mental illness. Either it's a lie or the guy is mentally ill.

Originally posted by samhain
A business owner is under no obligation whatsoever to sell you anything or provide you with their services.

Unless someone is covered under a protected class.

Which does not include political affiliation, oddly. Seems like an oversight, as political discrimination is one of the oldest forms of bias, and certainly a common problem today.

Originally posted by Surtur
the current technician is a muslim who is not comfy doing so.

I'd side with the Muslim on this. I just don't think that anybody should be made to do something they are uncomfortable with. The tranny is free to look elsewhere for the service, the Muslim is also free to look for alternative employment I suppose. In fact, the tranny is missing out on a gap in the market for transgender/transsexual spa days, instead of making a big hurrah of it they could bring about real change.

Originally posted by samhain
I'd side with the Muslim on this. I just don't think that anybody should be made to do something they are uncomfortable with. The tranny is free to look elsewhere for the service, the Muslim is also free to look for alternative employment I suppose. In fact, the tranny is missing out on a gap in the market for transgender/transsexual spa days, instead of making a big hurrah of it they could bring about real change.

I'd side with the muslim too. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Originally posted by Surtur
I'd side with the muslim too. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Originally posted by samhain
A business owner is under no obligation whatsoever to sell you anything or provide you with their services.

👆

Agreed. That is the only part of this story I was okay with. They don't like her and who she represents. If they want to throw her out, so be it.