The Diversity Industry
Interesting stuff.
Especially the part about most of the major media networks being sued for multi BILLION dollars, in class action lawsuits.
Dare I repeat myself and say I really hate lawyers? 🙂
Because this SJW crap is totally the fault of lawyers looking to cash in on class action lawsuits, on the strength of well meaning "protected class" laws, for billions. That is the very definition of "gaming the system."
I just wish leftists would be honest when they talk about diversity. They just mean less white people lol. It is that simple.
Lawyers can be weasels and a lot of times the places just end up settling out of court.
I'm pretty sure the starbucks incident lead to those men getting a tidy cash sum. They(the men) donated a large figure to charity in the aftermath. It's nice the charity got money, it's not nice the guys who refused to buy anything and refused to leave got rewarded and turned into victims.
I watched this yesterday but did not comment.
I got the Heebie-jeebies when he started singling out Jews and played the ominous music. That shit is ****ing creepy and my mind immediately shuts off when I see that kind of shit. That's the exact kind of racism that netted us with 7 million dead Jews.
But I was told to keep an open mind and not automatically assume pointing out that a particular religion or people may be doing a certain thing, is racist. That it could actually be a certain thing that a certain religion or race does. (For example, pointing out that Mormons get married younger, on average, than the US population).
So everything seems fairly straightforward in the video except the antisemitic portion.
Originally posted by Surtur
I just wish leftists would be honest when they talk about diversity. They just mean less white people lol. It is that simple.
That's on you for feeling threatened that your demographic might appear less. By more diversity, the left mean just that: more fvcking diversity. Hell, whites can also be used to create a more diverse group of people by including more white females, more white members of the LGBTQ, etc.
So far, there's no shortage of whites, there's just more blacks, hispanics, Muslims and the likes.
Originally posted by MythLord
No, not really.That's on you for feeling threatened that your demographic might appear less. By more diversity, the left mean just that: more fvcking diversity. Hell, whites can also be used to create a more diverse group of people by including more white females, more white members of the LGBTQ, etc.
So far, there's no shortage of whites, there's just more blacks, hispanics, Muslims and the likes.
Lol bullshit. They mean less whites. Diversity is the reason Chuck Schumer gave for not wanting to vote for a Trump nominee.
It has nothing to do with my feelings and everything to do with my observations.
Lol:
A group of all black people can still be diverse. A group of all whites can be diverse. These facts are not allowed, cuz reasons. Do I need to even link to the stories of people freaking out over "it's okay to be white" posters being hung at some colleges?
And please separate the notion that there is a shortage of whites(not what I said) with the notion that when people speak about diversity they mostly just mean skin color, and it most always means less whites and more minorities. Which I'm fine if that is what they want...but they need not be shy about it.
Originally posted by cdtm
The employee got thrown under the bus.If there's a policy against squatters, and they refused to buy anything or leave, there isn't much left but to call the police.
We're in the era where whenever you call the cops on a black person it is racist. It's like people feel the ONLY reason a person can be a dick these days is racism. Woman calls the cops on black girl screaming at the top of her lungs, selling water in front of the womans building? Shiiiit, racism. Automatic racism. You could never be annoyed by such a thing unless you just hate black people. That woman was probably disappointed she couldn't lynch the child right then and there.
Originally posted by Surtur
Lol bullshit. They mean less whites. Diversity is the reason Chuck Schumer gave for not wanting to vote for a Trump nominee.It has nothing to do with my feelings and everything to do with my observations.
Lol:
A group of all black people can still be diverse. A group of all whites can be diverse. These facts are not allowed, cuz reasons. Do I need to even link to the stories of people freaking out over "it's okay to be white" posters being hung at some colleges?
And please separate the notion that there is a shortage of whites(not what I said) with the notion that when people speak about diversity they mostly just mean skin color, and it most always means less whites and more minorities. Which I'm fine if that is what they want...but they need not be shy about it.
That, again, doesn't equate to less whites. It means more people of colour, women, LGBTQ members, etc.
SJW hilarity notwithstanding, given I don't really think they speak for the majority of the left no more than I believe the alt-right speak for you or any other right-winger.
Originally posted by MythLord
That, again, doesn't equate to less whites. It means more people of colour, women, LGBTQ members, etc.SJW hilarity notwithstanding, given I don't really think they speak for the majority of the left no more than I believe the alt-right speak for you or any other right-winger.
It really does depend though, doesn't it? Take the oscars. You can only give out so many of those awards. So "Oscars so white" type of shit is about less white people. It's not about adding more awards.
Chuck Schumer didn't wanna vote for one of Trumps nominees, on the grounds that he was white and he wanted diversity. Again this wasn't about merely adding more non whites, as he didn't talk about creating more positions for Trump to nominate people for. It was about not wanting the nominee because he was white.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I watched this yesterday but did not comment.I got the Heebie-jeebies when he started singling out Jews and played the ominous music. That shit is ****ing creepy and my mind immediately shuts off when I see that kind of shit. That's the exact kind of racism that netted us with 7 million dead Jews.
But I was told to keep an open mind and not automatically assume pointing out that a particular religion or people may be doing a certain thing, is racist. That it could actually be a certain thing that a certain religion or race does. (For example, pointing out that Mormons get married younger, on average, than the US population).
So everything seems fairly straightforward in the video except the antisemitic portion.
Yeah, Frame Game does that.
He claims he's a jew himself, who fancies himself a "whistleblower" for the more corrupt elements out there.
He seems to be exactly who he says he is: A very disillusioned jew sees "rackets" in the name of social justice.
You're right to be suspicious, and right to listen to his words and see what he actually says.
Originally posted by MythLord
That, again, doesn't equate to less whites. It means more people of colour, women, LGBTQ members, etc.SJW hilarity notwithstanding, given I don't really think they speak for the majority of the left no more than I believe the alt-right speak for you or any other right-winger.
I agree they don't speak for the majority.
That raises the question of why a vocal minority seems to have power disproportionate to their numbers.
The Evergreen scandal is a good example. If Weinstein is correct, everything comes down to one bully, who happens to chair the equity council. So, why is everyone bending over backwards to appease her?
Why did they either silently allow her to call Bret a racist, or affirm that now "is not the time to defend yourself"? Why didn't anyone speak in his defense?
And why did the President and another administrator keep passing the buck to each other on who should force her resignation?
Was it a petty insistance of "Not my job"? Or is there something else to it?
Originally posted by cdtm
Yeah, Frame Game does that.He claims he's a jew himself, who fancies himself a "whistleblower" for the more corrupt elements out there.
He seems to be exactly who he says he is: A very disillusioned jew sees "rackets" in the name of social justice.
You're right to be suspicious, and right to listen to his words and see what he actually says.
Thanks, you're a good thread-host. 👆
Originally posted by MythLord
No, not really.That's on you for feeling threatened that your demographic might appear less. By more diversity, the left mean just that: more fvcking diversity. Hell, whites can also be used to create a more diverse group of people by including more white females, more white members of the LGBTQ, etc.
So far, there's no shortage of whites, there's just more blacks, hispanics, Muslims and the likes.
^ Nailed it.
It's people kneejerking, thinking the safety bubble they've built around themselves is being threatened when it's not. In short, it's "But Muh Whiteness!" fearmongering.
I think this fear of theirs stems from the concern that in the coming generations America will indeed be 'less White'; that's just natural change. America after all is called the "melting pot". But that doesn't mean White people are magically just going away, it will just be a bit more non-White faces in the crowd than their used to now. ie "more fvcking diversity" as you said.
Originally posted by Surtur
It really does depend though, doesn't it? Take the oscars. You can only give out so many of those awards. So "Oscars so white" type of shit is about less white people. It's not about adding more awards.
Originally posted by Surtur
Chuck Schumer didn't wanna vote for one of Trumps nominees, on the grounds that he was white and he wanted diversity. Again this wasn't about merely adding more non whites, as he didn't talk about creating more positions for Trump to nominate people for. It was about not wanting the nominee because he was white.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Diversity for the sake of diversity is retarded. it should be based on merit. if that means certain group or groups end up being either over/under-represented in an activity, so be it.
So you're a technocrat and you value others through their merits and not into which ethnicity someone was born?
You're a despicable person. Truly reprehensible.
A merit based system is ideal, in an ideal world where you don't have qualified people being turned away due to the prejudices of others. Unfortunately we've not reached Gene Roddenberry's vision of the future, at least not yet.
Though we're much closer than we've ever been. IMO, we're (at least the US) in the best state in regards to equality, despite some backticks here and there.