Originally posted by Silent Master
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/history
pssst.. It's a mythology derived from numerous cultures. Not literal history. I know you're far, FAR too ignorant to grasp this... 😂
Originally posted by Silent Master
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/history
pssst.. It's a mythology derived from numerous cultures. Not literal history. I know you're far, FAR too ignorant to grasp this... 😂
You might want to actually read the definitions in the link, as you're just making yourself look more and more retarded the longer this goes on https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/history
Originally posted by NemeBro
No, I didn't report you, nor did you call me out. Considering your continued cowering from my rather simple question, I'd imagine you are the one who can't handle being directly contronted. But you are going to be banned my friend.
I don't give a shit about your BS question.. If you can't see the obvious link between by stance and my position on the character.. you know nothing relevant of the character to begin with.
But thanks for your irrelevant deflections.
Also, your mother was a ho spreading her nasty STD-ridden pussy to any nigga with bread, only to be dropped like the five dollar hooker she is with a slightly retarded baby in her lap, who grew up to be you. 👆
..So just a weak race baiting e-thug routine from you..? Not even TRYING to stick to the subject? ok e-*****.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You might want to actually read the definitions in the link, as you're just making yourself look more and more retarded the longer this goes on https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/history
The Book of Genesis, particularly the story of Cain and Abel, is NOT history, idiot.
But Let's see you prove otherwise, fanatic.
Originally posted by panthergodYes yes, I understand that your modus operandi is to make claims, then refuse to support them and lord your alleged position of superiority over the heads of people who ask you to justify said claims. "If you don't already know there's no point in me telling you".
I don't give a shit about your BS question.. If you can't see the obvious link between by stance and my position on the character.. you know nothing relevant of the character to begin with.But thanks for your irrelevant deflections.
..So just a weak race baiting e-thug routine from you..? Not even TRYING to stick to the subject? ok e-*****.
You're extremely predictable my friend. Literally the same posting style in every thread. An inability to adapt is a sign of low intelligence. 👆
That you can't even fathom why someone would question why someone like you would like the character only shows me that you don't know anything about him. 🙂
Originally posted by NemeBro
Yes yes, I understand that your modus operandi is to make claims, then refuse to support them and lord your alleged position of superiority over the heads of people who ask you to justify said claims. "If you don't already know there's no point in me telling you".
You're extremely predictable my friend. Literally the same posting style in every thread. An inability to adapt is a sign of low intelligence. 👆
That you can't even fathom why someone would question why someone like you would like the character only shows me that you don't know anything about him. 🙂
Oh, I can fathom why a person would would be that idiotic as to need to ask that question, I just can't imagine why you think I wouldn't be willing to point out how ignorant you are of everything the character represents at his best in order to need to ask it.
But enough of these BS deflections. Stick to the matter at hand.
Originally posted by ArtificialGlory
Oh look, I was right: 'Yurugu' is a term used by ignorant Afrocentrists to explain why the whitey is so darn evil. Colour me surprised.
So the answer is NO, you AREN'T interested in knowing anything about what you are talking about beyond a typical goofball mentality indemic to your worldview. Typical. 😂 😮💨
Originally posted by dadudemon
I am now aware of another false statistic thanks to you.But I can tell you that in 2004, this was found:
Similarly educated black Americans have median incomes at 95% of their white peers. And black Americans actually have HIGHER incomes than similarly educated whites.
Isn't that amazing? I love these facts that come from 2004.
http://www.jbhe.com/news_views/47_four-year_collegedegrees.html
So it would appear that this victimization bullshit that many leftists and SJWs are trying to sell black people is WRONG and harmful to the black community. Nothing is worse than telling a group of people that if they try to get ahead that they are just getting dog treats from their white masters. When the literal and factual tool that they can use is getting an education and participating in the workforce. You're telling them that the very thing that can help them rise up is bad or not obtainable.
And this is part of why I spend my time volunteering with a special charity that helps teens and young adults escape violance. I donate money and time to help people, locally, get on the right track in life, prioritize education, and get out of the cycle of violence.
So when I read bullshit like what you posted, I take personal issue with it. I am literally fighting against false ideas like yours so young black men, especially, stop believing in that stupid bullshit.
Here is some more data about black men:
http://blackdemographics.com/population/black-male-statistics/
Here's the takeaway: get an education. When someone tells you that you can't do it or that you're just an Uncle Tom, work harder and tell those naysayers to f*ck off.
Go Google "BLACK WEALTH" and the name Antonio Moore will come up. Go read the 64 page report he provided with Dr. Garrity and then provide those "FACTS" as a counterpoint.
You have Black college graduates working Uber and living at home while you trot out this TRASH as fact. 30 PERCENT of Black people in America live in poverty. The Median wealth of a Black family in America is somewhere around $1200-1500 including ALL assets.
Take "Personal issue" with your own ARROGANCE and IDIOCY and not my referencing reality for Black men in America!
Originally posted by LordofBrooklyn
Go Google "BLACK WEALTH" and the name Antonio Moore will come up. Go read the 64 page report he provided with Dr. Garrity and then provide those "FACTS" as a counterpoint.You have Black college graduates working Uber and living at home while you trot out this TRASH as fact. 30 PERCENT of Black people in America live in poverty. The Median wealth of a Black family in America is somewhere around $1200-1500 including ALL assets.
Take "Personal issue" with your own ARROGANCE and IDIOCY and not my referencing reality for Black men in America!
Not a single fact presented in your post.
Okay, got it. You're just another racist trying to keep black people down.
You're poison.
Originally posted by SurturThey aren't penalized because they aren't discriminated against in the work place to the extent that other minority groups are.
It's just too bad asians aren't "diverse" enough for leftists. To the point where they are penalized.
Demonstrating, again, that affirmative action is not some targeted attack against white people but a reaction to discrimination in the work place.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
They aren't penalized because they aren't discriminated against in the work place to the extent that other minority groups are.Demonstrating, again, that affirmative action is not some targeted attack against white people but a reaction to discrimination in the work place.
Asians are targeted in schools though. Don’t remember we’re I read it, but it was showned that Asians were giving lower scores in there sat’s just because the others races didn’t perform as well.
Originally posted by Silent MasterYeah, and to say that asians do not benefit at all from affirmative action is a lie. There are programs in schools that aim to help asians get into the system, and asians are considered minorities in a lot of AA initiatives.
Not being discriminated against to the same extent is not the same as not being discriminated against at all.
Here's some proof for Squall's point, from the New York Times. (There is more from Asian advocacy groups, but posting the times to avoid accusations of "bias"😉
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/15/us/harvard-asian-enrollment-applicants.html
Harvard consistently rated Asian-American applicants lower than others on traits like “positive personality,” likability, courage, kindness and being “widely respected,” according to an analysis of more than 160,000 student records filed Friday by a group representing Asian-American students in a lawsuit against the university.Asian-Americans scored higher than applicants of any other racial or ethnic group on admissions measures like test scores, grades and extracurricular activities, according to the analysis commissioned by a group that opposes all race-based admissions criteria. But the students’ personal ratings significantly dragged down their chances of being admitted, the analysis found.
The court documents, filed in federal court in Boston, also showed that Harvard conducted an internal investigation into its admissions policies in 2013 and found a bias against Asian-American applicants. But Harvard never made the findings public or acted on them.
Harvard, one of the most sought-after and selective universities in the country, admitted only 4.6 percent of its applicants this year. That has led to intense interest in the university’s closely guarded admissions process. Harvard had fought furiously over the last few months to keep secret the documents that were unsealed Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT
The documents came out as part of a lawsuit charging Harvard with systematically discriminating against Asian-Americans, in violation of civil rights law. The suit says that Harvard imposes what is in effect a soft quota of “racial balancing.” This keeps the numbers of Asian-Americans artificially low, while advancing less qualified white, black and Hispanic applicants, the plaintiffs contend.[Read the court documents here and here.]
The findings come at a time when issues of race, ethnicity, admission, testing and equal access to education are confronting schools across the country, from selective public high schools like Stuyvesant High School in New York to elite private colleges. Many Ivy League schools, not just Harvard, have had similar ratios of Asian-American, black, white and Hispanic students for years, despite fluctuations in application rates and qualifications, raising questions about how those numbers are arrived at and whether they represent unspoken quotas.
You have 1 free article remaining.
Subscribe to The Times
Harvard and the group suing it have presented sharply divergent views of what constitutes a fair admissions process.“It turns out that the suspicions of Asian-American alumni, students and applicants were right all along,” the group, Students for Fair Admissions, said in a court document laying out the analysis. “Harvard today engages in the same kind of discrimination and stereotyping that it used to justify quotas on Jewish applicants in the 1920s and 1930s.”
Harvard vigorously disagreed on Friday, saying that its own expert analysis showed no discrimination and that seeking diversity is a valuable part of student selection. The university lashed out at the founder of Students for Fair Admissions, Edward Blum, accusing him of using Harvard to replay a previous challenge to affirmative action in college admissions, Fisher v. the University of Texas at Austin. In its 2016 decision in that case, the Supreme Court ruled that race could be used as one of many factors in admissions.
EDITORS’ PICKSThe Fast and Furious Michael Avenatti
China Got a 99-Year Lease for a Port Near India. Here’s How, and Why.
Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Wolf Scientist?
ADVERTISEMENT
“Thorough and comprehensive analysis of the data and evidence makes clear that Harvard College does not discriminate against applicants from any group, including Asian-Americans, whose rate of admission has grown 29 percent over the last decade,” Harvard said in a statement. “Mr. Blum and his organization’s incomplete and misleading data analysis paint a dangerously inaccurate picture of Harvard College’s whole-person admissions process by omitting critical data and information factors.”[How do you rate a college applicant’s personality traits. Read more here.]
In court papers, Harvard said that a statistical analysis could not capture the many intangible factors that go into Harvard admissions. Harvard said that the plaintiffs’ expert, Peter Arcidiacono, a Duke University economist, had mined the data to his advantage by taking out applicants who were favored because they were legacies, athletes, the children of staff and the like, including Asian-Americans. In response, the plaintiffs said their expert had factored out these applicants because he wanted to look at the pure effect of race on admissions, unclouded by other factors.
Both sides filed papers Friday asking for summary judgment, an immediate ruling in their favor. If the judge denies those requests, as is likely, a trial has been scheduled for October. If it goes on to the Supreme Court, it could upend decades of affirmative action policies at colleges and universities across the country.
Harvard is not the only Ivy League school facing pressure to admit more Asian-American students. Princeton and Cornell and others also have high numbers of Asian-American applicants. Yet their share of Asian-Americans students is comparable with Harvard’s.
In Friday’s court papers, the plaintiffs describe a shaping process that begins before students even apply, when Harvard buys data about PSAT scores and G.P.A.s, according to the plaintiffs’ motion. It is well documented that these scores vary by race.
The plaintiffs’ analysis was based on data extracted from the records of more than 160,000 applicants who applied for admission over six cycles from 2000 to 2015.
You can find a lot more examples from Asian advocacy groups.