Originally posted by Silent Master
You already agreed the armor was melted in some areas, melted armor does not function as well as whole armor. Why are you asking me to prove something you already admitted is true?
The definition of damage is pretty clear.
I said the outside layer of the suit was damaged. Not that thr suit as a whole was damaged.
There is a diference in that.
Originally posted by FrothByte
You're avoiding the question. Can IM survive a sustained lightning barrage from Thor for the whole day without a single scratch? Because that's what immune means. So do you really think IM is immune to lightning?
According to the video he is. Whether it can resist lightning forever idk. There is a reason Thor didnt use lightning again, because it was useless.
But lets move on with a more recent model to put you into context.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lnfmmp_Kjek
The Mk. 45 was holding Sokovia on its back when it exploded into a ball of electricity and debris. Yet we see that the suit is intact.
I can safely assume that the Mk. 50 is immune to lightning.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
According to the video he is. Whether it can resist lightning forever idk. There is a reason Thor didnt use lightning again, because it was useless.But lets move on with a more recent model to put you into context.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lnfmmp_Kjek
The Mk. 45 was holding Sokovia on its back when it exploded into a ball of electricity and debris. Yet we see that the suit is intact.
I can safely assume that the Mk. 50 is immune to lightning.
You're being inconsistent. If you're not sure whether it can resist lightning forever then by definition, you don't believe it is immune. Again, resistant is different from being immune. You already admitted that the outside was damaged, which means it's not immune. Immune means it was completely unscathed.
No one is claiming that Thor's lightning can easily destroy IM's suit as it has indeed showcased itself to be resistant to it. But if you want to claim that it's completely immune to lightning, that it can withstand multiple blasts of it without damage, then it's up to you to prove it.
Originally posted by FrothByte
You're being inconsistent. If you're not sure whether it can resist lightning forever then by definition, you don't believe it is immune. Again, resistant is different from being immune. You already admitted that the outside was damaged, which means it's not immune. Immune means it was completely unscathed.No one is claiming that Thor's lightning can easily destroy IM's suit as it has indeed showcased itself to be resistant to it. But if you want to claim that it's completely immune to lightning, that it can withstand multiple blasts of it without damage, then it's up to you to prove it.
Fine, i can rephrase myself. The suit (mk 6 model) is resistant to lightning. Dont see how changes the panorama of this battle.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Fine, i can rephrase myself. The suit (mk 6 model) is resistant to lightning. Dont see how changes the panorama of this battle.
Well in the end, we still haven't seen anything from IM that guarantees he can take out or even damage Thor, whereas Thor has already shown he can damage IM and Hela > Thor. You can make a Titan Seven vs. Thor Ragnarok thread if you want and we can continue there.
Originally posted by FrothByte
Well in the end, we still haven't seen anything from IM that guarantees he can take out or even damage Thor, whereas Thor has already shown he can damage IM and Hela > Thor. You can make a Titan Seven vs. Thor Ragnarok thread if you want and we can continue there.
Thor has shown he can damage the Mk. 6 suit. Nothing suggest he can even scratch the Mk. 50 nanosuit.
I never said the 7 could defeat Hela.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
You changed subject. Concession accepted, the suit wasn't damaged.
You're a liar, the subject was your claim that IM's suit was immune to lightning.
Here is the proof.
Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
IM is immune to Thor's Lightning. Iron Spider should be too. They can hold him.Strange's strings are magical, they don't conduct electricity.
In other words Thor can be handled!
Furthermore, as I already cleaim, Thor can't remain God-Mode forever. He drains out.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Prove that Iron-man is immune to Thor's lightning.
Originally posted by Silent Master
You're a liar, the subject was your claim that IM's suit was immune to lightning.Here is the proof.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Fact, Iron Man's suit has been damaged by lightning
Originally posted by Silent Master
Iron Man's suit was visually damaged in such a way that it's obvious his armor would be incapable of providing the same level of protection as it did before the lightning strike.t.
Clearly you were debating that lightning could DAMAGE IM's suit! In other words, didn't your parents thought you not to lie? LIAR LIAR!
But don't worry Silent, it's evident you can't defend your position on the suit being damage 👆
Originally posted by Silent Master
If lighting damaged the suit then it's obviously not immune to lightning like you claimed. it's the same topic. only a retard would think they're different. Are you a retard?
Your lie has been exposed Silent 😉
Either you prove that the suit's functionality was comprimised to fulfill the definition of damage, or your concession is accepted.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Your retardation has been exposed.BTW, you already admitted the suit was damaged.
Originally posted by Josh_AlexanderI said the outside layer of the suit was damaged. Not that the suit as a whole was damaged .
Am sure am the retard here? Cause it seems you can't read son! 😂
Originally posted by FrothByteJosh doesn’t know what any word means.
I don't think you know what immune means. Getting melted tears throughout your suit does not equal being immune.As for penetrating the suit, when one quick blast can make tears like that in your armor, common sense dictates that multiple blasts will make similar (if not more) damage to the armor. In short, it can't take multiple hits. Or are you implying that IM suit's interior is somehow far stronger than its exterior?
Originally posted by Rage.Of.OlympusSaying he is immune when we see Hela’s projectiles affect him shows he isn’t immune. She lacked the power of the means to defeat him.
Surtur is a 4500 tall fire creature who is immune to physical attacks and he stabbed with his giant sword attack that destroyed a planet....Odin stopped her when he was at peak. That same Odin beat full power Surtur and left him as a crippled wreck half a million years ago. Surtur and Odin at their peaks are by far the most powerful Marvel characters aside from Thanos with IG and Dormammu. Entirely different tier of characters that bear no relevance to this team.
Mantis has to get close to do that. Hela is a lot more dangerous than Thanos up close because she can omni-directional spam her weapons on a whim that doesn't rely on making a closed fist with an external object that can be removed. Strange's BFR is a possibility but also not a sure thing because Hela has to some degree the ability to teleport herself.
So saying she is unbeatable isn’t true despite your semantics. We see her beaten on screen and know she was beaten prior to.
We have strange, portals, misdirection, etc. we see many characters get the jump on her in the film that isn’t half as formidable as the team that challenged Thanos on Titan. She won’t even come into play until Hela is vulnerable to such an attack. Tony Stark and Dr. Strange are pretty good at this fighting thing.
Hela can’t just come back on a whim. She’d lose the battle if she ends up in a strange portal.