Originally posted by SurturWell no because one is a hypothetical scenario that hasn't happened. An incomplete hypothetical scenario at that.
Your answer is quite clear: you wouldn't say Antifa is the same.
If someone murders an innocent bystander in the same circumstances at a rally of Antiwhite hate organised by the Alt-left yes they should be punished and are exactly the same.
Originally posted by Surtur
Well you aren't very bright Rob. Or you're trolling. Which is it?
False Dilemma
But I can support my observation: They were a multitude of ways you could have portrayed your pretend Nazi in your pretend scenario, but you specifically choose to make him (let's call him Stewart B. Schneider, or "Nazi Stew", if you're into the whole brevity thing) as benign as possible. See?
Originally posted by RobtardSurt, you are being schooled by Rob here! I hope you are taking notes! This is a masterclass of debating!
False DilemmaBut I can support my observation: They were a multitude of ways you could have portrayed your pretend Nazi in your pretend scenario, but you specifically choose to make him (let's call him Stewart B. Schneider, or "Nazi Stew", if you're into the whole brevity thing) as benign as possible. See?
Originally posted by Robtard
False DilemmaBut I can support my observation: They were a multitude of ways you could have portrayed your pretend Nazi in your pretend scenario, but you specifically choose to make him (let's call him Stewart B. Schneider, or "Nazi Stew", if you're into the whole brevity thing) as benign as possible. See?
The scenario was about murder, not self defense. You too stupid to get this? Or trolling?
Originally posted by Surtur? Your lost again and lashing out... It's O.K. Surt. Read back with a slow voice in your head. Hang on I'll help I have a hypothetical ball here, *hands Surt Imaginary hypothetical ball", go and play with it.
But you claim to be intelligent, are you just giving up on that?
Originally posted by Surtur
The scenario was about murder, not self defense. You too stupid to get this? Or trolling?
Let's talk about murder, let's talk about context, let's talk about equalization and all things in between those things.
Murder Case 1: A woman suffocates her 5yp because well, she didn't want to be burdened by motherhood.
Murder Case 2: A woman shoots and kills in cold blood the man who raped and mutilated her 5yo child two years prior.
(These are not pretend scenarios, these are actual cases. Names have been withheld)
Now, they're both murder as murder is just that. But do you feel they're the exact same in terms of context, morals, possible justification? Would you equalize and blanket these just the same?
Originally posted by Robtard
Let's talk about murder, let's talk about context, let's talk about equalization and a;; things in between those things.Murder Case 1: A woman suffocates her 5yp because well, she didn't want to be burdened by motherhood.
Murder Case 2: A woman shots and kills in cold blood the man who raped and mutilated her 5yo child two year prior.
( These are not pretend scenarios, these are actual cases. Names have been withheld)
Now, they're both murder as murder is just that. But do you feel they're the exact same in terms of context, morals, possible justification? Would you equalize and blanket these just the same?
Jesus you're retarded.
Originally posted by RobtardI tried to make this point with Goober pages back, let's see if Surtur does better.
Let's talk about murder, let's talk about context, let's talk about equalization and a;; things in between those things.Murder Case 1: A woman suffocates her 5yp because well, she didn't want to be burdened by motherhood.
Murder Case 2: A woman shots and kills in cold blood the man who raped and mutilated her 5yo child two year prior.
( These are not pretend scenarios, these are actual cases. Names have been withheld)
Now, they're both murder as murder is just that. But do you feel they're the exact same in terms of context, morals, possible justification? Would you equalize and blanket these just the same?