Originally posted by Putinbot1
I tried to make this point with Goober pages back, let's see if Surtur does better.
And you still haven't actually answered any of my points Mr Trump Jr 😂 . All you did was ask if all the victims had KKK uniforms in their closet as if that's something that needs to be disproved to charge those who assaulted them.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not reading almost 10 pages of this B.S.Someone summarize, honestly, what happened.
You already know what happened.
25 folks in masks did a 1 year anniversary rally (totally retarded.)
Thousands rallied to say stfu, some small percentage of Antifa came and f-d it up for everyone.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not reading almost 10 pages of this B.S.Someone summarize, honestly, what happened.
LOL you can't really trust anyone to do this.
But I wanted to get an idea of how far these weasels would go. Asked Putin bot if he'd think antifa were as bad as nazis if they murdered someone.
He said "well if it was self defense" and I clarified no murder. Then they ask if it was a nazi who was murdered lol. So I give two scenarios, one an innocent and one a nazi who had not attacked anyone. Then it's implied I'm soft on nazis cuz I specified this nazi wouldn't have attacked anyone. Yet if he had they could scream self defense, which defeated the purpose of the scenario.
Then Rob and Putin trolled and celebrated pretend victories.
Originally posted by dadudemon
I'm not reading almost 10 pages of this B.S.Someone summarize, honestly, what happened.
Originally posted by Surtur
LOL you can't really trust anyone to do this.But I wanted to get an idea of how far these weasels would go. Asked Putin bot if he'd think antifa were as bad as nazis if they murdered someone.
He said "well if it was self defense" and I clarified no murder. Then they ask if it was a nazi who was murdered lol. So I give two scenarios, one an innocent and one a nazi who had not attacked anyone. Then it's implied I'm soft on nazis cuz I specified this nazi wouldn't have attacked anyone. Yet if he had they could scream self defense, which defeated the purpose of the scenario.
Then Rob and Putin trolled and celebrated pretend victories.
You and Robtard are like siblings bickering over who didn't put the toilet seat down and then putin comes in and puts and down and takes a dump.
Terrible.
Originally posted by snowdragon
You already know what happened.25 folks in masks did a 1 year anniversary rally (totally retarded.)
Thousands rallied to say stfu, some small percentage of Antifa came and f-d it up for everyone.
Originally posted by Robtard
Ever watch a double-fisting video? Well that's basically what happened to Surt here 🙁
Originally posted by Surtur
LOL you can't really trust anyone to do this.But I wanted to get an idea of how far these weasels would go. Asked Putin bot if he'd think antifa were as bad as nazis if they murdered someone.
He said "well if it was self defense" and I clarified no murder. Then they ask if it was a nazi who was murdered lol. So I give two scenarios, one an innocent and one a nazi who had not attacked anyone. Then it's implied I'm soft on nazis cuz I specified this nazi wouldn't have attacked anyone. Yet if he had they could scream self defense, which defeated the purpose of the scenario.
Then Rob and Putin trolled and celebrated pretend victories.
Originally posted by darthgoober
Everyone agrees that Nazis are bad, but some people think that unprovoked violence against them or Trump supporters is ok since people feel marginalized, which some people disagree with. Basically the same argument that's been going for 2 or 3 years now 😆
Robtard's answer is the most accurate and clear winner. Knew you could do it, Rob!
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Surtur telling Daddy...@Gooober, I actually did ask almost exactly that and then you said I was saying something else and I explained about sentences and circumstance and I answered a page or so back as I had to complete the Scenario.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Read back you'll find it, like I said you didn't understand and went off about the law being applied differently and then I explained again differently. It's fine though.
Originally posted by Silent Master
People don't want to honestly answer a simple question because doing so would prove they're just as biased as they're claiming the other side is.
I read the summaries and I understood the basics of the last 10ish pages. I can't believe they made 10 pages while I was working for 4 hours.