Greatest Feat of Durability ever?

Originally posted by h1a8
He got impaled. That's not a durability feat. Many humans were impaled and not died instantly. Durability is about resisting damage.

Not dying instantly isn't a durability feat. Just as Getting chopped to pieces and not dying instantly isn't a durability feat. The fact that you got chopped to pieces means that you have shitty durability.

I don't think you understand how kryptonite works...

Nothing even comes close. H1 is an idiot.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOLOBJSJL0I

And that's a MASSIVE underestimation. He only used the visible surface area. The rings seemed to focus the full power of a Star. Making it even more ridiculous.

People are forgetting that Marvel had multiple physicists consulting on the movie. The directors weren't just shooting blanks even though the script-writers might have.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
It's pretty much an anti-feat, seeing as Thor would've died if not for the Stormbreaker...

Thor was alive and breathing. In pain, and crispy, but alive. Even conscious to a point. So it counts.

Rocket thinks he would've died. The Guardian's also didn't understand how Thor could survive space. Thanos thought Thor would have died from being blown up by the Power Stone. Malekith thought the same with the Aether.

I think Thor would have lived tbh, but that's just mo. Anakin cry-baby Skywalker survived worse.

Thor's main super power aside from lightning is taking a beating that would have killed anyone else and should've killed him. Even Hela oddly enough underestimated him.

But the dwarf, the one who knew thor and Odin and had a good idea of asgardian biology, was the one who said he was dying?

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
It's pretty much an anti-feat, seeing as Thor would've died if not for the Stormbreaker...

Interesting analysis. 👆

You could cut the time he spent exposed to the energy in half, while Thor was hurting but unscathed, and it'd still be more impressive than every single other durability feat in DCEU and MCU. Put together.

That scene was so far beyond anything that has ever come before, it's ridiculous. Etri said it was the full power of a Star. People keep mentioning heat, revealing a frightening ignorance of the composition of Star's. A Neutron Star average output is 0.25 of the power of the Sun according to the citation I read. That is so mindbogglingly RIDICULOUS.

Superman, Hulk, Iron Man, and Wonder Woman could spend the rest of their lives punching Thor in the face in-tandem and they'd hurt themselves before he gets flustered if we scale off this feat.

Luckily it was Thor who racked it up, not Superman or Hulk, or the boards would be unbearable. We basically have to ignore the feat, or pretend it doesn't exist/lowball (See: H1) or there is no point debating Thor in the movie forum.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
You could cut the time he spent exposed to the energy in half, while Thor was hurting but unscathed, and it'd still be more impressive than every single other durability feat in DCEU and MCU. Put together.

That scene was so far beyond anything that has ever come before, it's ridiculous. Etri said it was the full power of a Star. People keep mentioning heat, revealing a frightening ignorance of the composition of Star's. A Neutron Star average output is 0.25 of the power of the Sun according to the citation I read. That is so mindbogglingly RIDICULOUS.

Superman, Hulk, Iron Man, and Wonder Woman could spend the rest of their lives punching Thor in the face in-tandem and they'd hurt themselves before he gets flustered if we scale off this feat.

Luckily it was Thor who racked it up, not Superman or Hulk, or the boards would be unbearable. We basically have to ignore the feat, or pretend it doesn't exist/lowball (See: H1) or there is no point debating Thor in the movie forum.

The feat it's impressive, but you are exaggerating a bit boy.

And honestly, i don't think Thor can endure an impact from SB in the chest.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The feat it's impressive, but you are exaggerating a bit boy.

And honestly, i don't think Thor can endure an impact from SB in the chest.

......I'm underplaying it, to a large degree. Brother, all you need is an online calculator and the citations in the video I posted for some rough estimates to come to this conclusion. It's not hard. A neutron Star cools down after it's formation because of the neutron's being stripped away, but there are still incredibly powerful sources of energy.

Why would Thor getting impaled by Stormbreaker be an issue....?

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Does anyone from the MCU or the DCEU have a feat of durability on par with this?

No one from Marvel.

Clearly, Superman tanking the world engines are more impressive.

It’s immensely impressive I remember something like a teaspoon of matter from a neutron Star would take thousands of cranes to lift. Thor enduring the heat/pressure exerted from the Star is Incomprehensibly more impressive than Clark being near death due to a nuke of unknown yield

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
......I'm underplaying it, to a large degree. Brother, all you need is an online calculator and the citations in the video I posted for some rough estimates to come to this conclusion. It's not hard. A neutron Star cools down after it's formation because of the neutron's being stripped away, but there are still incredibly powerful sources of energy.

Why would Thor getting impaled by Stormbreaker be an issue....?

Because Hela beat him badly with her small necro swords.

Steve would've tanked it better.

Thor nearly dying from hitting the ground is worse then a weakened Superman and a nuke.

And taking the World Engines beats barely surviving a star.

Our sun's core is only about 27 million degrees farenheit. A nuclear bomb burns at anywhere between 50-150 million degrees farenheit. A neutron star only burns at about 1.7 million degrees, and drops steadily because of it constantly losing neutrons.

Originally posted by NotAllThatEvil
I don't think you understand how kryptonite works...

Originally posted by cdtm
No one from Marvel.

Clearly, Superman tanking the world engines are more impressive.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah.

Ja. 😛

They were essentially leaking Kryptonite. Even if the sun is more punishing, tanking it while weakened is impressive.

Comparing the energy output of a neutron star to a nuke is like comparing a nuke to a firecracker that had 99.9% of its gunpowder removed.

Originally posted by cdtm
Ja. 😛

They were essentially leaking Kryptonite. Even if the sun is more punishing, tanking it while weakened is impressive.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Comparing the energy output of a neutron star to a nuke is like comparing a nuke to a firecracker that had 99.9% of its gunpowder removed.

150 million to 1.7 million l, so yeah. That's exactly what it's like.