Originally posted by h1a8The writers intentions are that Thor experienced the heat energy that came from the star., nothing more.
Something I told Quan.
When you keep repeating the same nonesense argument which absolutely nobody else uses, and when you fail to convince even 1 person of your argument, then one of two things are happening:
1) Either you are Purposefully Trolling, or
2) Your arguments are Trash tier.
Either option makes it clear your argument is not even worth responding to.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
Something I told Quan.When you keep repeating the same nonesense argument which absolutely nobody else uses, and when you fail to convince even 1 person of your argument, then one of two things are happening:
1) Either you are Purposefully Trolling, or
2) Your arguments are Trash tier.
Either option makes it clear your argument is not even worth responding to.
If any truly objective fans responded then they would support what I’m saying.
Rage is adding shit to a movie. That’s called making shit up.
We see fire heating the damn container. We see Thor getting burned (not pushed or pulled). Heat melts metal in a forge. Stars have heat. Common sense really.
It’s called figurative language. All the evidence in the world points to it and 0 evidence points to it being literal (because that would make no sense).
Originally posted by Inhuman
mmmDialog straight from the Avengers: Infinity War via IMDB:
[b]"Eitri: You understand, boy, you're about to take the full force of a star. It'll kill you."
Figurative language as proven in an earlier post. Do you want to see the evidence again?
Originally posted by h1a8
Figurative language as proven in an earlier post. Do you want to see the evidence again?
What evidence? You mean your opinion? You haven't proven anything.
Common sense is the movie telling the audience exactly what is going to happen in the Thor scene.
No need to throw your own spin on it other than what the writers already told us what was going to happen. Not figuratively but exactly what they wanted to happen in that scene.
You don't like it, then write an email to the Russo brothers. Let's see if they like you twisting and changing their intentions on the movie they made.
Originally posted by Inhuman
What evidence? You mean your opinion? You haven't proven anything.
Common sense is the movie telling the audience exactly what is going to happen in the Thor scene.No need to throw your own spin on it other than what the writers already told us what was going to happen. Not figuratively but exactly what they wanted to happen in that scene.
You don't like it, then write an email to the Russo brothers. Let's see if they like you twisting and changing their intentions on the movie they made.
I gave facts. Remember in 1st grade where we learned the difference between fact and opinion?
Originally posted by h1a8
Fact 1: There was no great force action on Thor as he didn't accelerate a large amount after he let go, given his mass.Fact 2: We see the beam is hot and creates flames.
Fact 3: We know that heats melts metal and that stars have heat.
Fact 4: The star was emitting its energy in all other areas of its surface area (over 90% more area).
This is overwhelming evidence (from facts) that Etri words were figurative.
You would be an idiot for thinking Etri wasnt using figurative language.
Everyone who saw the scene initially thought HEAT. Rage came weeks later and made up some shit and everyone then followed. This wasnt your or anyone’s here original idea. So how can it be writers intentions for Etri words to be literal?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Provide the quote from the movie or the writer which states that Thor only withstood the heat energy.
I don’t have to. I provided other evidence that supports it.
Also the fact that nearly everyone (if not everyone) initially thought HEAT when they saw the scene at the movies. Rage created the theory weeks after everyone saw it. Everyone else jumped on the bandwagon. It wasn’t yours or anyone who initially saw the movie original idea. That alone proves the writer’s intentions.
Originally posted by Silent Master
If you cant provide the quote from the movie or the writer which states that Thor only withstood the heat energy, That means at best you're just guessing. thus you insisting your opinion is fact makes you a liar.
It was shown that Thor was resisting the heat energy. Nothing else is shown. You are asking me to prove a negative. Prove that Etri didn’t have a rubber duck toy in his back pocket.
Originally posted by Nibedicus
lol @ h1 trying to shift burden of proof again
Plus the logic behind his attempt doesn't even make any sense.
h1: The writer's intention was X
Us: Post where this is stated.
h1: Stop asking me to prove a negative
h1: Prove that X wasn't his intention
Us: Does anyone else see the irony
h1: You're just a troll
Us: 🙄
Hilarious thing is h1 was the one who continually went on about writers intention with regards to a statement in Supergirl coming from someone whose facts/knowledge might be lacking (Jimmy).
But when same applies to Thor, but from a much more reliable source, then suddenly that doesnt count as writers intention. And h1 can seemingly decide what writers intentions are.
Originally posted by h1a8
I gave facts. Remember in 1st grade where we learned the difference between fact and opinion?
Obviously you didn't learn anything. I suggest you go back to school.
Originally posted by h1a8
Fact 1: There was no great force action on Thor as he didn't accelerate a large amount after he let go, given his mass.
1. Its a movie . Things will not be totally accurate but we don't have to speculate because the writers tell us what they meant to show during that sequence regardless of inaccuracies, because you know , no one has ever witnessed the effects of the full force of a neutron star focused on a condensed beam hitting something.
Fact 2: We see the beam is hot and creates flames.
2. We see the beam that according to the writers contained the full force of the star. Including heat. Like I asked previously. Are you trying to say you can see, gravity, radiation, cosmic rays, with the naked eye? I suggest you read an elementary school level book about outer space and educate yourself.
Fact 3: We know that heats melts metal and that stars have heat.
3. Great.
Fact 4: The star was emitting its energy in all other areas of its surface area (over 90% more area).
4. We know the neutron star core was inside a spherical object surrounding the whole thing , that had an iris that could be opened to release the full force of the star in a condensed beam.
From the movie we see this device is containing all the stars forces in check.
Where is the speculation at?
You claimed that ALL OF THESE FACTS are speculation.
This is overwhelming evidence (from facts) that Etri words were figurative.
You have stated no facts. Just personal opinion. And are ignoring the writers.