Hulk vs. Kurse

Originally posted by K-Dog
Thor in god mode would still hard pressed to defeat an enemy that could swat Mjolnir away imo.

To be fair, we don't really know how well Kurse or Hulk can take a full powered lightning blast from Thor.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Please copy and paste here the MVF rule that says any website can be considered canon.

Define canon.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Define canon.

Considered as fact regarding the specific movie/s we are talking about.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Considered as fact regarding the specific movie/s we are talking about.

A thing doesnt have to be canon in order to be valid for a movie.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
No, but it does make it stronger.

Since there are no facts on the ability, it's a matter of which opinion is the strongest.

Fan opinions are irrelevant to a debate. This board goes by movie feats only.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
A thing doesnt have to be canon in order to be valid for a movie.

It does if you want to use it in this board for debating purposes. If you disagree then feel free to message Imp and ask for a ruling.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Fan opinions are irrelevant to a debate. This board goes by movie feats only.

The feats give credit to the claim.

Originally posted by FrothByte
It does if you want to use it in this board for debating purposes. If you disagree then feel free to message Imp and ask for a ruling.

I dont, the MVF rules are clear.

The rules state that websites are your friend but use them wisely. That doesn't mean any half-baked theory you can find is automatically valid for debates.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The rules state that websites are your friend but use them wisely. That doesn't mean any half-baked theory you can find is automatically valid for debates.

The fact that they can be used means that they are valid lol!

Okay, apparently valid is another word you don't understand the meaning of, thus continuing this is pointless.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
I dont, the MVF rules are clear.

Please copy and paste the rule you believe allows you to do this. Just so we're all on the same page.

Edit: Nevermind. I've requested a ruling from Imp so we could get this over with.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Okay, apparently valid is another word you don't understand the meaning of, thus continuing this is pointless.

😂 So typical of you! When you dont longer have arguments you enter troll mode.

Cheerleading Frothbyte suits you better.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Please copy and paste the rule you believe allows you to do this. Just so we're all on the same page.

Edit: Nevermind. I've requested a ruling from Imp so we could get this over with.

Rule 2 of the MVF. Am not here to educate you Froth.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Rule 2 of the MVF. Am not here to educate you Froth.

Let's wait for Imp's ruling. If I'm wrong then I'll admit I'm wrong. Just hope you're mature enough to do the same if he tells you you're wrong.

Originally posted by FrothByte
Let's wait for Imp's ruling. If I'm wrong then I'll admit I'm wrong. Just hope you're mature enough to do the same if he tells you you're wrong.

2) Google, YouTube, and Wikipedia are your friends. Use them wisely to find all sorts of neat material for your threads.

The rule is pretty clear that I can use website intel.

I never said they are canon (For them to be canon they would have to be published by Disney or Marvel).

But as long as there is no evidence to nullify them they are valid for debating.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
The rule is pretty clear that I can use website intel.

I never said they are canon (For them to be canon they would have to be published by Disney or Marvel).

But as long as there is no evidence to nullify them they are valid for debating.

Look at you backpedalling. So you don't claim them to be canon yet you believe they're valid for debating?

So basically you're saying that anything you read from any random website regarding these movies is considered as fact?

Originally posted by FrothByte
Look at you backpedalling. So you don't claim them to be canon yet you believe they're valid for debating?

So basically you're saying that anything you read from any random website regarding these movies is considered as fact?

Please quote me saying they are canon.

Originally posted by Josh_Alexander
Please quote me saying they are canon.

Because in the MvF, we only use feats that are canon for debating. If you don't believe what you claim is canon, then they are useless for debates here and fall under the category "just your opinion".

So which are they? Do you believe they are valid to be used for debates (i.e. canon) or do you claim they're simply your opinion?

Imp stated that the Golden rule is movie feats only. So you have to view all other rules within that context. A rule saying that websites are your friend, but use them wisely obviously means you can use websites as long as they actually support what the movies show and not that you can use fan theories from websites in place of movie feats.