I don't like watching dogs hump each other or human girls. I have watched humans take the knot but it was more a case of curiousity and ammo. It actually kind of grosses me out. Same with that video of the pug eating that girl out that's going around Facebook. One watch is enough.
Some things I just can't beat off to. Gore too, though I'm a huge fan of that. Same with scat porn though I will certainly watch it.
My beat off taste is kind of tame now that I think of it
Ok, so this is a less creepy discussion than I expected. So let me play the devil's advocate here since I started the thread.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Dogs can't say yes /thread
Originally posted by One Big Mob
"If you get rid of all the reasons why it's bad, tell me why it's bad"You can justify everything like that. Why is raping babies considered bad once you get rid of the 'ew' factor, the Bible and we assume it's a normal adult person who took it in the safest way possible?
Yes, a normal adult... what a contradiction.
Why shouldn't you kill people, why shouldn't you wear people as masks, why can't I cut off my own arm, why can't I walk around naked all the time, why can't I just eat my own shit?
Sanity mostly
Meanwhile, this is not the case in the hypothetical scenario I've givven. Which is the purpose of the thread. Considering there's no harm involved, try givving reasons as to why this isn't ok from the progressive point of view. The "live and let live" kind of deal.
Originally posted by Robtard
Sam's once again letting us know about his weird Russian kinks. It's obvious he wants to get penetrated by a male dog and is using this thread as a tester.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
Hadn't read these responses but pretty much that's it.Wtf is up with Samzed though? You'd think he'd be playing the new Spiderman game instead of trying to justify ****ing his dog.
Originally posted by DarthPlaguis12No.
Get a life man
Originally posted by Surtur
You have too much power over the dog.
Originally posted by SamZEDThat's the point though, that you can move the goalposts for anything in life to make it seem less than what it is. The reasons you took away are pretty significant too. Mainly assuming the person is normal and the 'ew' factor. Just set that aside, just take the dog knot, it's ok as long as you don't think it's ewwy.
Ok, so this is a less creepy discussion than I expected. So let me play the devil's advocate here since I started the thread.Mute people can't say yes either. There are other ways to display interest. Key point you're not forcing the animal to do anything it doesn't want to.
I don't necessarily disagree with your conclusion but all the reasons you listed are pretty terrible and irrelevant tbh.
How many babies tried humping your leg? Killing people is bad because you're violating their right not to be murdered and worn as a mask. Same goes for raping babies. Remove the Ew factor and the Bible fact and you're still left with the fact that you're causing harm (physical or otherwise) to someone.Meanwhile, this is not the case in the hypothetical scenario I've givven. Which is the purpose of the thread. Considering there's no harm involved, try givving reasons as to why this isn't ok from the progressive point of view. The "live and let live" kind of deal.
A baby sucks anything that goes near its mouth. And murdering and raping people is apparently done under the pretense that you're a normal adult who's doing it in the safest way possible. Lube and smooth that baby up for landing. Drug or quickly murder that person.
But that's following the same exact reason. Maybe that person didn't deserve to live in your eyes? Maybe they were just a waste? Maybe that baby was seducing you and wanted it (I shit you not there's videos on pedophiles who think every boy wants to get plowed). No matter what sick twisted reasons you can come up with, if you simply ignore the worst reasons not to do it, you can justify doing it.
If you ignore the pain that goes away, tell me what's the harm? You're not chopping off an arm or anything and hindering them for life. What's wrong with chopping off an arm, they wanted to become left handed anyway. What's wrong with shitting in someone's food? Set aside the ew factor and it's not like you're hurting them.
Just because you think you can set aside some things, that doesn't make it cool. You could go kill every crackhead in your city, but it doesn't mean it's a great idea. Just set aside the fact that you're deleting people and tell me why it's bad... they're bad too!
You're taking advantage of your dog mostly. Dogs don't fuk for fun like humans, they **** out of instinct. Tricking your dog into going in there is going to likely require some work as well. The dog didn't decide to roll over and put it in your ass. Dogs don't just do shit like that on command. You did or are doing something sick to get to that point.
"Just set aside the ew factor"
No. That's a pretty huge factor and a pretty flimsy reason, like I said above. That's your justification, not a sane person's. You know any sane men that get penetrated by dogs? You hang out with anyone that goes "Yeah I'm just going to grab some milk from the store, maybe grab a 6 pack and watch the game later. You guys want to head over before Rover sticks his cock in my ass later tonight? I told him 'not deep' last time, and he went knot deep! What a weekend that was!"
Even ignoring the ew factor you're a weird fuk that preys on dogs. Why would you expect to be accepted into society when you can't even get a guy to put it in your ass and have to prey on dogs instead?
And if you buy a dog to train it to fuk you and intend to pretend it's normal, I hope you'd be upfront with the people you're getting the dog from.
Among other things.
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
But dog's intellect is comparable to children. Are you saying it's ok to **** them if 'they show interest'?Just typing that made me die a little inside, pal.
Plus they're dogs. How the 'F can you really know what their body language is saying?
They aren't human beings, after all. Even a dog humping my leg isn't a proposal to stick it in him.
Yeah. Everyone's covered this pretty well. I'm glad to know KMC is a lot of things, but we aren't animal rapists.
And yeah, the mute person analogy doesnt work. The issue isn't just the ability to communicate but the ability to reason. Without strong mental agency, the dog can't consent, especially not to someone with so much power over it. An able-bodied, pass out drunk human can't consent for basically the same reason. Think of your dog as a falling over drunk person at a party. Don't do it, even if they wag their tail.
So the whole thing is gross, but beyond the "ewe" factor there actually wouldn't be anything wrong with it. Dogs are instinctual and live for the approval of their masters so if the dog is willing... who cares. It's not like consent is all that huge of a deal to dogs anyway and there are several billion instances of legs getting humped to back that up lol
Dogs are incapable of giving consent so it would be rape.
You deserve the rope, because this thread is nothing more then a thinly veiled attempt to criticize some other sexual dynamic you morally disapprove of, just like how homophobes always conspicuously start bringing up pedophilia when they want to attack homosexuality.
Originally posted by darthgooberDogs are willing to do dog things like play catch or roll over, they will not "allow" you to shove a baton up their ass, you ****ing clown.
So the whole thing is gross, but beyond the "ewe" factor there actually wouldn't be anything wrong with it. Dogs are instinctual and live for the approval of their masters so if the dog is willing... who cares. It's not like consent is all that huge of a deal to dogs anyway and there are several billion instances of legs getting humped to back that up lol
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Dogs are incapable of giving consent so it would be rape.Russians deserve to be nuked.
Dogs are willing to do dog things like play catch or roll over, they will not "allow" you to shove a baton up their ass, you ****ing moron.
Also, in this thread the premise is whether or not it's ok for a master to let the do ban HIM, not vice versa
Originally posted by Tzeentch
I'm black, I'm always angry.
Originally posted by Tzeentch
Again, health issue.