So why shouldn't I let my dog bang me?

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Probably. It was all done years ago back when one of the posters here (a Superman fan) who I was friends with, passed away from cancer. So I changed it to that symbol.

Welcome to GDF, where cancer and death are worshipped, my innocent friend.

The fact is, no one "lets" them.

They train them or coerce them.

A male dog humps legs, not genitals. By all means let him finish if that's what you want.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Welcome to GDF, where cancer and death are worshipped, my innocent friend.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
I heard that if it is a legitimate rape, the body has a way of shutting that whole thing down.

so much stupidity coming out of republican mouths, i totally forgot that one

Not all republicans want to bang a dog. At least some don’t, I think

Straw man. This thread is about letting your dog bang you, not banging your dog

Originally posted by ilikecomics
Straw man. This thread is about letting your dog bang you, not banging your dog

Well enjoy letting your dog bang you. Please don’t let us know how it comes out.. giggity

Lol I don't think humans and dogs should bang at all.

Originally posted by One Big Mob
"Just set aside the ew factor"

No. That's a pretty huge factor and a pretty flimsy reason, like I said above. That's your justification, not a sane person's. You know any sane men that get penetrated by dogs? You hang out with anyone that goes "Yeah I'm just going to grab some milk from the store, maybe grab a 6 pack and watch the game later. You guys want to head over before Rover sticks his cock in my ass later tonight? I told him 'not deep' last time, and he went knot deep! What a weekend that was!"

Originally posted by SamZED
Those of you who've seen my thread about incest are probably not shocked by this one. Everyone else... bear with me for a sec...

From a progressive stand point... can you try givving me reasons for why a person shouldn't be allowed to do what's described in the title?
Once you get rid of the "Ewww!" factor and "Well, the bible says..." factor... Full grown functioning adult that is absolutely "normal" otherwise. And uses all the necessary protection (not talking about a leash here).
From a [b]progressive point of view... is there a reason why this person shouldn't be accepted by the society? Not ridiculed at work or worse - fired for being open about such sexual preferences? I made it a "passive" position on purpose to avoid pets rights violation argument to make it a bit more difficult.

And before you ask - no I don't have a dog. I have a cat but she wasn't interested. [/B]

Originally posted by Newjak
This might be one of the stupidest thing I've ever read on here.

He tried to **** his cat? 😆

But the cat said no. 😆

Then he complained on kmc! crylaugh