Darth Vader - Comic Book Thread

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
That's why the 7th Sister blade locked him and the two other Inquisitors were flanking him before the Jedi stepped in.

Ohh she clashed blades with him? Wow.

Lol they were getting kicked around. He was holding his own against the 3 of them pretty casually tbh.

Na Er is probably Anakin Skywalker. I agree with Ares384. As for Ku Ar, we will probably find out later in the series. I however, love that Vos survived!!!

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Ohh she clashed blades with him? Wow.

Lol they were getting kicked around. He was holding his own against the 3 of them pretty casually tbh.

Given he never dealt with more then one of them at a time and by the end of it he was about to have to deal with an assault against all of them from 3 different directions, I don't think he was capable of handling them "casually."

Filoni said he wrecked them or something along those lines, IIRC.

Not what was shown.

Maul pretty solidly wrecked them, rofl. In fact, I thought you were trolling earlier suggesting otherwise.

Kun, Exar confirmed Canon.

If only.

exar kun getting killed by inquisitors? sounds good to me

Originally posted by DarthAnt66
Maul pretty solidly wrecked them, rofl. In fact, I thought you were trolling earlier suggesting otherwise.

I wasn't. I really don't see how taking on one Inquisitor at a time, backing off and then repeating the cycle until he tired and got bladelocked by one of them allowing the other two flank him is "dominating."

Yay more shitty Vader comics. We really don't have enough of Vader!

Guess Vos will be Vader’s final opponent seeing as he’s the strongest in the list after Yoda. Looking forward to seeing their duel

That would actually be a decent fight now that canon Vos is super OP compared to his Legends version

So do we think Vader vs Vos will happen in this series then? Or will they save it for a Novel?

Too bad we can’t get it in animation form.

Could happen in the series considering it's all about hunting the remaining Jedi.

Wouldn’t even mind a brand new comic series focusing on Vos from Order 66 to his final duel with Vader, rather than seeing everything just from Vader’s point of view

^ Could do both, and have it crossover.

Originally posted by UCanShootMyNova
I wasn't. I really don't see how taking on one Inquisitor at a time, backing off and then repeating the cycle until he tired and got bladelocked by one of them allowing the other two flank him is "dominating."

They didnn't/couldn't land a single hit on him. He landed hits on them.

LOL @ "backing off". It was a tight space and he was engaging 3 combatants simultaneously.

I didn't realize "getting blade locked" was some kind of defeat. In any case he Allowed her to blade lock him. If you do or do not remember he was trying to prove to Kanan and Ahsoka that he was on their side, so wanted to give them an opportunity to aid him.

However he was never in any trouble, given they couldn't land a single hit on him. And he certainly wasn't tried LOL

Originally posted by Darth Thor
^ Could do both, and have it crossover.

They didnn't/couldn't land a single hit on him. He landed hits on them.

LOL @ "backing off". It was a tight space and he was engaging 3 combatants simultaneously.

I didn't realize "getting blade locked" was some kind of defeat. In any case he Allowed her to blade lock him. If you do or do not remember he was trying to prove to Kanan and Ahsoka that he was on their side, so wanted to give them an opportunity to aid him.

However he was never in any trouble, given they couldn't land a single hit on him. And he certainly wasn't tried LOL

Well, Ventress landed hits on Obi-Wan & Anakin and Dooku landed hits on Obi-Wan & Anakin. Yet in bot cases the single opponent isn't massively better (even inferior in the first case) than any member of the team. Of course Maul's better than the Inquisitors but using that very brief encounter to somehow justify the idea that Maul could comfortably take 3 of them is reaching.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Well, Ventress landed hits on Obi-Wan & Anakin and Dooku landed hits on Obi-Wan & Anakin. Yet in bot cases the single opponent isn't massively better (even inferior in the first case) than any member of the team. Of course Maul's better than the Inquisitors but using that very brief encounter to somehow justify the idea that Maul could comfortably take 3 of them is reaching.

I said "Take on" all 3, not "Take" all 3. There's a difference. I also said he looked superior, which he did. And there's literally nothing supporting the idea that the 3 Inquisitors were > Maul.

Let's not forget how much his power against the Inquisitors impressed Ezra. The same Ezra who watched Ahsoka beat down 2 Inquisitors.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
I said "Take on" all 3, not "Take" all 3. There's a difference. I also said he looked superior, which he did. And there's literally nothing supporting the idea that the 3 Inquisitors were > Maul.

Let's not forget how much his power against the Inquisitors impressed Ezra. The same Ezra who watched Ahsoka beat down 2 Inquisitors.

You also completely neglected the fact that in Star Wars media there's a constant returning idea that when we have a team of fighters against a single fighter (e.g. Ventress vs Obi-Wan & Anakin, Dooku vs Obi-Wan and Anakin) the single fighter suddenly lands far more hits compared to a one versus one confrontation. Imagine if we would exclude Anakin's fights against Dooku and look purely at both Dooku's confrontations with Anakin & Obi-Wan, we would definitely come to a far different conclusion for Anakin's power level. Who's to say that this situation is not the same?

Reaching Thor, Ezra's supposed reaction isn't really factual evidence. Besides, the same Ahsoka couldn't penetrate the Fifth Brother's defenses on Malachor, you know the one that kept Maul busy for a pretty long duration of time.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
You also completely neglected the fact that in Star Wars media there's a constant returning idea that when we have a team of fighters against a single fighter (e.g. Ventress vs Obi-Wan & Anakin, Dooku vs Obi-Wan and Anakin) the single fighter suddenly lands far more hits compared to a one versus one confrontation. Imagine if we would exclude Anakin's fights against Dooku and look purely at both Dooku's confrontations with Anakin & Obi-Wan, we would definitely come to a far different conclusion for Anakin's power level. Who's to say that this situation is not the same?

Tbh I shouldn't really respond to this because you've not given even 1 specific example. I personally don't remember any fight where Ventress is kicking Anakin and Kenobi around, and they don't land a single hit on her. Dooku - maybe. Of course Dooku actually is superior tp Obi-Wan and more skilled than Anakin.

Anyway in all those fights, they both land hits on each other (whether they be force pushes or kicks).

The Inquisitors were unable to land a single hit on Maul. And he was hardly being "driven back" the way you and Nova make out.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Reaching Thor, Ezra's supposed reaction isn't really factual evidence.

It's added fuel to my "evidence".

You yourself have failed to provide a single piece of evidence that the Inquisitors looked superior.

Originally posted by DarthDuelist9
Besides, the same Ahsoka couldn't penetrate the Fifth Brother's defenses on Malachor, you know the one that kept Maul busy for a pretty long duration of time.

Ezra didn't see much of that.