Originally posted by Putinbot1
You're far too bright to believe racism and homophobia are not everyday issues for many.
In the US?
Racism and homophobia are not everyday issues for almost every single person. It's extremely rare, by the numbers.
(total umber of racist or homophobic interactions in a day)/(total number of human interactions a day) = x
Where x is a greater than .01
and
frequency_x > or = 183 days per year
I don't peddle all social liberal memes. Some are just stupid like this one. Sorry, rampant homophobia and racism are not a thing. They are extremely rare.
Originally posted by dadudemonNot online
In the US?Racism and homophobia are not everyday issues for almost every single person. It's extremely rare, by the numbers.
(total umber of racist or homophobic interactions in a day)/(total number of human interactions a day) = x
Where x is a greater than .01
and
frequency_x > or = 183 days per year
I don't peddle all social liberal memes. Some are just stupid like this one. Sorry, rampant homophobia and racism are not a thing. They are extremely rare.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Not online
I still disagree. There's far too many normal interactions online and anonymity adds another layer that makes it even harder for a person to experience homophobia and racism. In fact, that was one of the original attractions to the outcasts - a haven of anonymity.
Originally posted by dadudemonI disagree with you and cite the ziggy's of this forum as prime examples.
I still disagree. There's far too many normal interactions online and anonymity adds another layer that makes it even harder for a person to experience homophobia and racism. In fact, that was one of the original attractions to the outcasts - a haven of anonymity.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
I disagree with you and cite the ziggy's of this forum as prime examples.
You're making a mountain out of a spec of dust. The Ziggy's are very rare types even on the internet. I would say they are extremely rare, not just very rare. And their behavior is not tolerated at all by their peers.
For every 1000 normal people, there's one racist moron. For every 100,000 SJWs, there's 1 homophobe. The numbers just don't work the way you stated.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
not offline either. don't buy his snake shit
See what I mean? There's hypocritical creeps like Bashar who like to pretend to be SJWs on the internet.
Rick Berman was ahead of his time. A sort of "alternate ending" to First Contact that ended up being pretty topical today..
Originally posted by dadudemonbut DDM you have a guy posting next to you called realist racism.
You're making a mountain out of a spec of dust. The Ziggy's are very rare types even on the internet. I would say they are extremely rare, not just very rare. And their behavior is not tolerated at all by their peers.For every 1000 normal people, there's one racist moron. For every 100,000 SJWs, there's 1 homophobe. The numbers just don't work the way you stated.
See what I mean? There's hypocritical creeps like Bashar who like to pretend to be SJWs on the internet.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
but DDM you have a guy posting next to you called realist racism.
Statistics are hard to grasp, I understand your point.
You're experiencing what is called confirmation bias. You don't realize you're doing it. But if you think about the numbers objectively instead of emotionally, that confirmation bias disappears and you see that the actual numbers do not fit your idea.
Despite his username...did he post something homophic today against someone? Racist? You claimed everyday and you put to one example. But not even this fulfills your requirement.
And he's a parody account, anyway. A lefty mocking the right.
Originally posted by dadudemonYes, you do seem to be struggling with statistics. As we've seen a number of times. For instance you need a sample group far bigger than the voting population for three million not to be a significant number. As for confirmation bias, I suspect where you live is not that multicultural based on many statements you have made in the past DDM.
Statistics are hard to grasp, I understand your point.You're experiencing what is called confirmation bias. You don't realize you're doing it. But if you think about the numbers objectively instead of emotionally, that confirmation bias disappears and you see that the actual numbers do not fit your idea.
Despite his username...did he post something homophic today against someone? Racist? You claimed everyday and you put to one example. But not even this fulfills your requirement.
And he's a parody account, anyway. A lefty mocking the right.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Yes, you do seem to be struggling with statistics. As we've seen a number of times.
I know you are but what am I.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
For instance you need a sample group far bigger than the voting population for three million not to be a significant number.
Right, the difference being:
46.1% vs. 48.2%
I know 3 million seems like a very large number to you. It's hard to wrap your mind around it, right? But the US has a lot of people in it. 2.1% is not that big of a difference at all.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
As for confirmation bias, I suspect where you live is not that multicultural based on many statements you have made in the past DDM.
Of course, of course. But Tulsa is in the top 10 list of LGBT cities so there's 1 out of 2 for you. I'll be back to point out how you don't understand statistics, later.
You understand at all levels it's statistically significant right? You know what a sample group is? You know what a p value is, don't worry if you don't DDM, you don't have to. This puts Trumps popular vote loss in perspective, with numbers you don't have to be good at maths to get.
News > World > Americas > US politics
Donald Trump has lost popular vote by greater margin than any US President
President-elect is now 2.8 million votes behind Hillary Clinton - five times more than the second biggest deficit
Benjamin Kentish @BenKentish
Monday 12 December 2016 18:32
262 comments
Click to follow
The Independent US
Donald Trump is the fifth US President in history to lose the public vote but still win the White House
Donald Trump is the fifth US President in history to lose the public vote but still win the White House ( )
Donald Trump lost the popular vote in last month’s US presidential election by a bigger margin than any other US president in history.
The Republican is currently trailing Democrat rival Hillary Clinton by 2.8 million votes as the last remaining postal ballots are counted – despite him winning the November 8 election because of the Electoral College system.
That deficit is more than five times bigger than the 544,000 by which George W. Bush lost to Al Gore in 2000 - the second biggest popular vote deficit in history for a candidate who has still gone on to become President.
Electoral college members demand information on Russian relations before voting for Donald Trump
Watch more
Donald Trump could violate US Constitution on first day of presidency
Only five US presidents in history have been elected despite losing the popular vote: John Quincy Adams in 1824, Rutherford Hayes in 1876, Benjamin Harrison in 1888, George W. Bush in 2000 and Donald Trump this November.
Mr Trump has previously responded angrily to people pointing out his defeat in the popular vote.
Last month he tweeted: “In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally.
"Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California - so why isn't the media reporting on this? Serious bias - big problem!”
The President-elect did not provide any evidence that illegal voting had taken place and has been criticised for making the unsubstantiated allegation.
President Trump protests
Show all 20
Despite losing the public vote by some margin, Mr Trump still won the presidency after victory in the Electoral College, which sees each state assigned a number of votes that go to the candidate who wins the public vote in that state.
The Republican won the Electoral College after victory in swing states such as Florida, Ohio and North Carolina, in addition to surprise wins in previously Democrat-held states including Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
However, Mrs Clinton’s lead in the popular vote has led to calls for the Electoral College delegates to ignore the vote outcome in their states and instead vote against Mr Trump.
Read more
Trump went for the only issue that could really hurt China: Taiwan
Donald Trump knocks $3bn off Lockheed Martin stock value
Trump says ‘nobody really knows’ if climate change is real
Electoral College member files lawsuit to block Trump presidency
Several lawsuits have been filed against laws in some states that mandate delegates must cast their votes in line with the popular vote result in their state, while a petition calling on electors to vote against Mr Trump has received 4.8 million signatures.
In 2012 Mr Trump called the Electoral College “a disaster for democracy” after mistakenly thinking it would lead to President Obama losing the popular vote but retaining the White House.
Following his election victory, however, the billionaire businessman praised the “genius” of the system.
MORE ABOUT
DONALD TRUMP
US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION 2016
ELECTORAL COLLEGE
Reuse content
GET IN TOUCH
Contact us
Jobs
OUR PRODUCTS
Subscriptions
Install our apps
Archive
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Evening Standard
Novaya Gazeta
EXTRAS
All topics
Voucher codes
Advertising guide
Syndication
LEGAL
Code of conduct and complaints
Contributors
Cookie policy
Privacy notice
User policies
Originally posted by RobtardThis is true but it was the largest popular vote margin of all time with significance at all p value levels.
Getting hung-up on how many is only part of the problem, as the 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing bombing showed, you need very few radicalized White American men to commit mass murder via domestic terrorism.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
You understand at all levels it's statistically significant right? You know what a sample group is? You know what a p value is, don't worry if you don't DDM, you don't have to. This puts Trumps popular vote loss in perspective, with numbers you don't have to be good at maths to get.
Originally posted by dadudemon
Right, the difference being:46.1% vs. 48.2%
I know 3 million seems like a very large number to you. It's hard to wrap your mind around it, right? But the US has a lot of people in it. 2.1% is not that big of a difference at all.