Deadshot vs Bullseye vs Tilda (aim contest)

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you're claiming that the 4828 meter shot wouldn't have been lethal.

Ok, prove it.

Strawman...

When did I ever say the shot wouldn't have been lethal?

Originally posted by Silent Master
If you think Deadshot can do better at 4828 meters, go ahead and prove it.

He doesn't have to prove it...

This thread features Deadshot, Bullseye, and Tilda; the debate is between those 3...

As pertains those 3, Deadshot has the greatest range of lethality...

That's all that matters despite your efforts to troll...

So you admit that the 4828 meter shot could have been lethal, great.

Originally posted by Silent Master
So you admit that the 4828 meter shot could have been lethal, great.

It could have been...who knows...who cares.

It may have not been...once again...who cares.

This thread is about Deadshot, Bullseye, and Tilda...

Out of those 3, only one of them possesses a 4 mile sphere of lethality...

And that one is Deadshot...

🙂

Per the thread, Deadshot probably would win. I made the mistake of siding with the character that seemed the most impressive, but that's not what the threads asking. So, in that case. i'll give it to Deadshot.

That is what the thread is asking.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
DCEU Deadshot
MCU/Netflix Bullseye
Tilda from Into the Badlands

All three of them have shown inhuman accuracy and aim. So, the question is, who do you guys think is more impressive?

For those unfamiliar with Tilda, here is an example of her throwing skill, at around 2:33 mark:

YouTube video

And she routinely pulls off these kinds of, quite frankly, physics-defying throws.

I thought it was just an aim contest. Well hell, I'm back to Bullseye then.

LoM tried to turn it into an aim only contest, because it's the only way he can give the win to his preferred character.

Originally posted by Silent Master
LoM tried to turn it into an aim only contest, because it's the only way he can give the win to his preferred character.

What the title asks for and what Vault asked for during the OP differ...

As per what the threads title asks for, Deadshot crushes all...

Also, Vault specifically asks who is most impressive...

IMHO, being able to kill anyone within two miles of your being (assuming the target can be killed by the weaponry Deadshot has at hand of course) is more impressive than what I've seen from Tilda or Bullseye...

You're aware that you have to aim in order to make trick shots, yes?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You're aware that you have to aim in order to make trick shots, yes?

Of course...

My point of contention is that Deadshot's vast range advantage is more impressive than the close range trickshots that Tilda and Bullseye are capable of...

It's just my opinion...

Accounting for factors like wind and bullet drop because You're naturally good at math is far less impressive than casually and often doing things that defy the laws of physics and movement.

Deadshot is amazing but a real life badass could at least get close to what he does. Tilda and Bullseye do things that are literally impossible in the real world.

Originally posted by KingD19
Accounting for factors like wind and bullet drop because You're naturally good at math is far less impressive than casually and often doing things that defy the laws of physics and movement.

Deadshot is amazing but a real life badass could at least get close to what he does. Tilda and Bullseye do things that are literally impossible in the real world.

The physics defying feats that Bullseye and Hilda can pull off are amazing...no question.

But IMO, this pales compared to someone capable of killing anyone within such a large sphere of lethality; I mean you are not safe from this man if you are within 2 miles of him...thats mind blowing.

And no, no real life badass can come anywhere near Deadshot...

Take the scene where he is moving through the street rapidly headshotting foe after foe after foe...no real life person is doing that...period.

Maybe...just maybe...a real life person can do that if they are hitting center mass...

But not headshots against moving targets in rapid succession...no way in hell.

Sorry, but I take Deadshot over Hilda and Bullseye and I don't look back...

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Personally, I'd back Tilda, because, as mentioned earlier, her accuracy flat-out defies the laws of physics. Another example being here, at the 0:38 mark:

YouTube video

Deadshot wins this contest easily. What he did is absolutely impossible in the real world. Shooting all those rounds (and from different guns) in the same hole, from that distance, is impossible. Accuracy of aim would be the least of his problems. He would have to see the future and have an indefinite amount of times to get it right. There are too many unknown variables to him.
1. The exact shape of each bullet is slightly different from each other (even across the same guns), making each bullet behave slightly different.
2. The groves inside the barrels and the sites of each gun (even across the same guns) are slightly different.
3. The unpredictable instantaneous change in airflow outside the barrel
4. The exact amount and quality of the gun powder in each casing (which again is different) .
And many more unknown variables.

Lmao at debating the longest shot (which Deadshot has over the other two) or how lethal they are (which is stupid since this is an accuracy contest).

Originally posted by h1a8
Wrong! There was at least a half of inch margin of error for her.

I said her throw defied the laws of physics. What's wrong about that?

And before you start the strawman BS you are prone to, me clearly saying I personally found it most impressive at the time is not an absolute assertion that it is. If I didn't think arguments could be made for all three, I would not have bothered making the thread.

Originally posted by h1a8

Deadshot wins this contest easily. What he did is absolutely impossible in the real world. Shooting all those rounds (and from different guns) in the same hole, from that distance, is impossible. Accuracy of aim would be the least of his problems. He would have to see the future and have an indefinite amount of times to get it right. There are too many unknown variables to him.
1. The exact shape of each bullet is slightly different from each other (even across the same guns), making each bullet behave slightly different.
2. The groves inside the barrels and the sites of each gun (even across the same guns) are slightly different.
3. The unpredictable instantaneous change in airflow outside the barrel
4. The exact amount and quality of the gun powder in each casing (which again is different) .
And many more unknown variables.

What is this fanboy nonsense?

Bullseye has to account for most of the above but for Completely random objects he picks up. Plus weve seen how impressive Bullseye is in a gun fight as well.

Bullseye is way more impressive and its it even a contest.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
What is this fanboy nonsense?

Bullseye has to account for most of the above but for Completely random objects he picks up. Plus weve seen how impressive Bullseye is in a gun fight as well.

Bullseye is way more impressive and its it even a contest.

Nothing bullseye did strikes me as impossible.

And what gun feat by bullseye is at least half as impressive as Deadshot's multiple bullet in the same hole feat?

Originally posted by h1a8

Nothing bullseye did strikes me as impossible.

And this is why you are the biggest joke on the entire forum.

Originally posted by h1a8
Nothing bullseye did strikes me as impossible.

Based on this response, I believe that there is a distinct possibility that you are legitimately retarded. And now, seeing as the possibility is out there, based on your own arguments in the Hela vs Destroyer thread, everyone here is free to consider you retarded unless you definitely prove otherwise.