Deadshot vs Bullseye vs Tilda (aim contest)

Started by h1a813 pages
Originally posted by tkitna
And this is why you are the biggest joke on the entire forum.

And hence why you are one of the dumbest members here. Another ad hominim attack. Attack the argument, not the person.

Again, nothing bullseye did in terms of accuracy was impossible.
If you disagree then explain what he did and why it is impossible.

Originally posted by h1a8
And hence why you are one of the dumbest members here. Another ad hominim attack. Attack the argument, not the person.

Again, nothing bullseye did in terms of accuracy was impossible.
If you disagree then explain what he did and why it is impossible.

You made the original statement, that means the burden is on you. So where is your proof in regards to Bullseye's feats?

Originally posted by Silent Master
You made the original statement, that means the burden is on you. So where is your proof in regards to Bullseye's feats?

The claim is that Bulleyes did impossible things when it comes to accuracy. I stated that it is false. They must prove that what he did is indeed impossible when it comes to accuracy. .

Originally posted by h1a8
The claim is that Bulleyes did impossible things when it comes to accuracy. I stated that it is false. They must prove that what he did is indeed impossible when it comes to accuracy. .

Just like you have to prove that what Deadshot did was impossible, seeing as you made that claim.

So, to be fair I'll demand they post proof after you provide proof for your claim, seeing as your claim came first.

Originally posted by h1a8

Again, nothing bullseye did in terms of accuracy was impossible.
If you disagree then explain what he did and why it is impossible.

So its possible for a human to ricochet bullets off of objects to hit a person right where he wants to?

Its possible for a human to take a gun apart in a matter of seconds and throw both pieces into the neck of two other humans from about a 20 yard distance?

Its possible for a human to casually throw objects behind them without looking with precise accuracy?

Its possible for humans to pick up any object within reach and throw them with precise, deadly accuracy?

If those examples are possible to you, prove them. Show me somebody who can do it. Bullseye has done these things multiple times, so luck plays no factor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRsQB16t37k

At 1:52 he throws a pen through a snow globe. I want to see a human do that.

4:52 he throws a billy club through the heart of a man from 20 or so yards away. I want to see a human do that.

At 7:15 he throws rosary beads that bust glass from a distance away. I'd like to see a human do that.

11:28 he throws a gun behind him from about 25 feet or so without looking that smacks the woman in the face. I'd love to see any human pull that off.

12:22 he throws something that brings an entire chandelier down. Again, show me a human that can do that?

etc,,,,you get the point. Well, you probably don't.

Debating with H1 would be like trying to hammer a nail with a brick of butter. Pointless, messy, and afterwards you wonder why the hell you thought it was a good idea.

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Debating with H1 would be like trying to hammer a nail with a brick of butter. Pointless, messy, and afterwards you wonder why the hell you thought it was a good idea.
Read the following rebuttals and see how debating is done.

Originally posted by tkitna
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRsQB16t37k

At 1:52 he throws a pen through a snow globe. I want to see a human do that.

4:52 he throws a billy club through the heart of a man from 20 or so yards away. I want to see a human do that.

At 7:15 he throws rosary beads that bust glass from a distance away. I'd like to see a human do that.

11:28 he throws a gun behind him from about 25 feet or so without looking that smacks the woman in the face. I'd love to see any human pull that off.

12:22 he throws something that brings an entire chandelier down. Again, show me a human that can do that?

etc,,,,you get the point. Well, you probably don't.

There is a key word you are missing. The word is "accuracy".

Originally posted by h1a8
The claim is that Bulleyes did impossible things when it comes to accuracy. I stated that it is false. They must prove that what he did is indeed impossible when it comes to accuracy. .

Do you see the word "accuracy" twice?

Being able to throw things with superhuman force is a superhuman strength feat, not an accuracy feat. Otherwise I can say that Superman is more impressive because of his strength feats.

Accuracy wise, nothing Bullseye did was impossible. Impressive yes, but not impossible.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like you have to prove that what Deadshot did was impossible, seeing as you made that claim.

So, to be fair I'll demand they post proof after you provide proof for your claim, seeing as your claim came first.

I proven what he did was impossible when it comes to accuracy WITHOUT anyone asking me to.
I stated the proof at least twice. Did you read the proof?

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Debating with H1 would be like trying to hammer a nail with a brick of butter. Pointless, messy, and afterwards you wonder why the hell you thought it was a good idea.

Yep, like a prog song. Long, scattered all over the place, annoying as hell, and doesn't make sense.

No H1, you didn't. You explained why you think what he did was impossible. However what you think has never been the standard for proof.

Yeah, but we all know that H1 considers his own word Gospel, while considering everything anyone else says as highly suspect unless whoever he is debating can be bothered to look past his ridiculous levels of hypocrisy and satisfy the absurd standard of evidence he applies to everyone but himself.

Do you think we should tell h1a8 that Poindexter was trained by Mr Miyagi when he was a boy?

Originally posted by Silent Master
No H1, you didn't. You explained why you think what he did was impossible. However what you think has never been the standard for proof.

It's easy to say that proof isn't proof.
That's not debating. That's trolling actually.

Originally posted by h1a8
It's easy to say that proof isn't proof.
That's not debating. That's trolling actually.

It's even easier to say that speculation isn't proof, which is what I did. claiming that I said "proof isn't proof" would make you a liar.

Are you a liar?

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's even easier to say that speculation isn't proof, which is what I did. claiming that I said "proof isn't proof" would make you a liar.

Are you a liar?

You are basically saying that the proof I posted isnt proof.
Anyone can do that. Thats not debating.

Originally posted by h1a8
You are basically saying that the proof I posted isnt proof.
Anyone can do that. Thats not debating.

You didn't post any proof, you posted your reasoning. calling your reasoning proof is very dishonest and is for all intents and purposes lying.

Please stop lying.

Um, Bullseye's accuracy is superhuman because he can consistently do these nigh impossible feats of accuracy. Just like Deadshot, can a regular human hit a given point on a target with a gun? Yes. Can a regular human do it over and over and over hundreds of times? No, not realistically. ergo, it's superhuman.

Originally posted by Robtard
Um, Bullseye's accuracy is superhuman because he can consistently do these nigh impossible feats of accuracy. Just like Deadshot, can a regular human hit a given point on a target with a gun? Yes. Can a regular human do it over and over and over hundreds of times? No, not realistically. ergo, it's superhuman.

This.

As mentioned in my initial OP post, all three have displayed inhuman aim/accuracy at various points in their respective outings.

But now, instead of people debating in the spirit I originally intended, you end up with people pulling blatant lowball BS, in some cases outright stating that feats that are clearly impossible by real life standards aren't.

This is actually how I view it:
In terms of long range shooting and traditional marksmanship - Deadshot.
In terms of overall versatility and lethality with a variety of objects - Bullseye.
In terms of performing feats that are just flat-out BS physics breaking - Tilda.

I feel like each has an area that they are strongest in.

Originally posted by Robtard
Um, Bullseye's accuracy is superhuman because he can consistently do these nigh impossible feats of accuracy. Just like Deadshot, can a regular human hit a given point on a target with a gun? Yes. Can a regular human do it over and over and over hundreds of times? No, not realistically. ergo, it's superhuman.

Buulesyes margin of effort is extremely large (more than several inches in most cases). He does not hit something that requires accuracy to the nearest millimeter.

Originally posted by h1a8
Buulesyes margin of effort is extremely large (more than several inches in most cases). He does not hit something that requires accuracy to the nearest millimeter.

Prove that Bullesye only comes close to hitting exactly what he was aiming at.