Originally posted by RobtardI still find it astounding how much you twist things to fit your narrative / perspective. Taking a man who literally spends his career saying "Grow the **** up and act like an adult, then maybe women will be interested in you", and changing that to the good old "enforced monogamy" bullshit that has been debunked a thousand times. Like, nobody expects you to enjoy someone like Peterson, but making claims that are quickly fact-checkable as utter tosh is just bad practice, and only serves to prove to the 'other side' that you are dishonest and will use dishonesty in the pursuit of 'winning' the argument. It's a shame, because you used to be a much better debater than that, I'm sure of it.
It's not your message necessarily which triggers them, it's in the blunt and unapologetic ego-crushing manner in which you deliver it, Pbot.Jordan Peterson who is seen as a messiah to the incel, the MRA and the garden variety Fedora-wearer alike basically says the same things you do, that these young men act the [shitty] way they do because they lack companionship, namely female companionship.
Yet why is he worshiped while you're an anathema to them? It's all in the delivery, my friend. Start coddling them like Peterson does, they'll be clawing themselves to suckle from your teat.
As far as the far-left (but still democratic) posters of the GDF go you're still one of the better ones (I don't think I've ever seen Adam, Prince of Eternia contribute anything of worth in all of his time here, tbh), but I think you have much more potential than what you are currently operating on. Also remember that I wouldn't bother saying this to someone I didn't hold a level of respect for; this isn't a diss or opening to a debate or anything of the like, just a rather extended observation from someone who has mostly been avoiding the GDF due to its boring, pointless dichotomous cycle of ad-hominems and tribalism.
Originally posted by Scribble
I still find it astounding how much you twist things to fit your narrative / perspective. Taking a man who literally spends his career saying "Grow the **** up and act like an adult, then maybe women will be interested in you", and changing that to the good old "enforced monogamy" bullshit that has been debunked a thousand times. Like, nobody expects you to enjoy someone like Peterson, but making claims that are quickly fact-checkable as utter tosh is just bad practice, and only serves to prove to the 'other side' that you are dishonest and will use dishonesty in the pursuit of 'winning' the argument. It's a shame, because you used to be a much better debater than that, I'm sure of it.As far as the far-left (but still democratic) posters of the GDF go you're still one of the better ones (I don't think I've ever seen Adam, Prince of Eternia contribute anything of worth in all of his time here, tbh), but I think you have much more potential than what you are currently operating on. Also remember that I wouldn't bother saying this to someone I didn't hold a level of respect for; this isn't a diss or opening to a debate or anything of the like, just a rather extended observation from someone who has mostly been avoiding the GDF due to its boring, pointless dichotomous cycle of ad-hominems and tribalism.
Okay. "enforced monogamy"? Didn't mention that. Weird.
Tell me one thing and please don't lie, who told you I posted about JP? As you said, you never come here really, yet zero'd in on this one? Doesn't add up.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Who do you think it is then? Kurk is the only bannable on site offender.
Valkorion has too much information on conversations I've seen outside of KMC that I wouldn't expect Kurk to know about unless if he has multiple informants and this is a really elaborate conspiracy. He also doesn't make the posts on the Star Wars vs. forum I'd expect Kurk to make.
Originally posted by ValkorionOnly in the US kid, in many other countries the demographic is different and actually it's different in social class and educational background as well as Geographical demographic. But hey ho, keep your simplistic opinion.
most people your age are conservative and most people my age are liberal, so i guess that means conservatism is the better position right
Originally posted by The EllimistWell if it is not Kurk I do not think he is in any danger regardiess of his opinions.
Valkorion has too much information on conversations I've seen outside of KMC that I wouldn't expect Kurk to know about unless if he has multiple informants and this is a really elaborate conspiracy. He also doesn't make the posts on the Star Wars vs. forum I'd expect Kurk to make.
Originally posted by RobtardIt's a conspiracy!! Nice.
Okay. "enforced monogamy"? Didn't mention that. Weird.Tell me one thing and please don't lie, who told you I posted about JP? As you said, you never come here really, yet zero'd in on this one? Doesn't add up.
Lol naw, I just have a JP censor that I got implanted in my brain by PetersonCorp®. It stops me eating anything other than beef, salt and water, but it does handily tell me any time someone on this forum talks about him.
Originally posted by Scribble
It's a conspiracy!! Nice.Lol naw, I just have a JP censor that I got implanted in my brain by PetersonCorp®. It stops me eating anything other than beef, salt and water, but it does handily tell me any time someone on this forum talks about him.
No conspiracy, you yourself say you avoid the GDF now because you see it as a shitshow and that's fair enough. Yet here you are because I mentioned JP.
Your post was a lecture on honesty, so are you going to practice what you just preached?