Originally posted by RobtardAnd do what? Tell you that Surtur PM'd me? Like... listen to yourself.
No conspiracy, you yourself say you avoid the GDF now because you see it as a shitshow and that's fair enough. Yet here you are because I mentioned JP.Your post was a lecture on honesty, so are you going to practice what you just preached?
I visit here a number of times a day, I just don't post. Because, as case is here, you'd rather discuss the possibility of me being a hired hand for Surtur than debate any real points, other than you trying to duck out of the "enforced monogamy" thing.
Which I'll reply to here:
Originally posted by RobtardThis is one of the main purposeful misinterpretations of Peterson's message, and one that has been debunked plenty of times. Anyone who gathers what you say they do from Peterson's message has willingly misinterpreted his words as much as you have. Which is to say, almost entirely.
Jordan Peterson who is seen as a messiah to the incel, the MRA and the garden variety Fedora-wearer alike basically says the same things you do, that these young men act the [shitty] way they do because they lack companionship, namely female companionship.
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Only in the US kid, in many other countries the demographic is different and actually it's different in social class and educational background as well as Geographical demographic. But hey ho, keep your simplistic opinion.
simplistic? lmao i'm using your own catchphrase where you don't factor in geography or social class either, you just say "you're young so i'm better"
damn you suck at debating, no wonder you would rather be a cringe-awful troll than cringe-awful debater so you can pretend the cringe is a feature and not a bug
Originally posted by Scribble
And do what? Tell you that Surtur PM'd me? Like... listen to yourself.I visit here a number of times a day, I just don't post. Because, as case is here, you'd rather discuss the possibility of me being a hired hand for Surtur than debate any real points, other than you trying to duck out of the "enforced monogamy" thing.
Which I'll reply to here:
This is one of the main purposeful misinterpretations of Peterson's message, and one that has been debunked plenty of times. Anyone who gathers what you say they do from Peterson's message has willingly misinterpreted his words as much as you have. Which is to say, almost entirely.
I asked for the truth and instead of answering you instantly got weirdly defensive and hostile, I did not say "tell me Surtur PM'd you", so maybe listen to yourself here?
Originally posted by NemeBro
I pmed him.
Oh shit this wasn't approved. There are plots upon plots taking place against Rob now.
The Right of KMC can say what they like (and they might even agree), but the loss of Bardock was a real hit for the GDF. The man could make and sustain legitimate left-wing arguments based on his personal beliefs and with use of evidence, without the need for cronying and constant trash-talking. We need more people like him right now.
Originally posted by Surtur
Oh shit this wasn't approved. There are plots upon plots taking place against Rob now.
^ Surtur thinks he's clever again
Originally posted by ScribbleK. Your insight and feelings will be factored into the kmc cog.
The Right of KMC can say what they like (and they might even agree), but the loss of Bardock was a real hit for the GDF. The man could make and sustain legitimate left-wing arguments based on his personal beliefs and with use of evidence, without the need for cronying and constant trash-talking. We need more people like him right now.
Originally posted by RobtardOkay, I'll listen to myself. You clearly have nothing of value to listen to anyway lmao, other than comments on my mood / temperament
I asked for the truth and instead of answering you instantly got weirdly defensive and hostile, I did not say "tell me Surtur PM'd you", so maybe listen to yourself here?
Originally posted by Putinbot1
Only in the US kid, in many other countries the demographic is different and actually it's different in social class and educational background as well as Geographical demographic. But hey ho, keep your simplistic opinion.
Dude, that's an argument against your "everyone who's under 40 isn't worth talking to" motto.