Hela vs. General Zod

Easy. Zod uppercutted Superhuman to the top of a skyscraper. When Superman almost was at the top, he crashed into the building, created a crater, while still managing to clear the top of the building. To be specific, Superman would have traveled much further upward if he didn’t crash into the building.

HV can melt thick steel in a couple of seconds.
Hela has no feats against that level of heat, not is there any significant evidence that she can withstand that level of heat.

Not even close to being as good as crushing Mjolnir with one hand.

See DT's comment.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not even close to being as good as crushing Mjolnir with one hand.

See DT's comment.

That feat isn't quantifiable, especially with Mjolnir having energy pressure inside of it and can cause Mjolnir to explode if it becomes under a certain pressure. And it's unquantifiable (minimum force it takes) since we don't know how much pressure Mjolnir can take before exploding.

And if it was a pure strength feat then that feat is an outlier since all her other feats contradict it by several magnitudes.

Lastly, she did not apply that level of strength to her strikes. Remember when you argued that strength feats are not striking feats.

You not being smart enough to quantify something doesn't mean it's unquantifiable.

As it stands by feats, Zod is weaker.

^^^By feats, exactly. That's why i said, its the only argument needed in Hela’s favor. She was on another level.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You not being smart enough to quantify something doesn't mean it's unquantifiable.

Originally posted by Robtard
Heh

Originally posted by Silent Master
You not being smart enough to quantify something doesn't mean it's unquantifiable.

As it stands by feats, Zod is weaker.

Originally posted by The Spectre+
so since youre the one "smart enough" quantify it!!

Not my job to disprove his claims, he has to prove them. that's how debates work.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You might want to read up on how hot a bolt of lightning can be Mr. Physics teacher.

I think around 4-5 times hotter than the surface of the sun potentially.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Considering Zod lost to people with zero fighting experience,

Lol wasn't he bred for combat too? Hilarious.

Originally posted by Surtur
I think around 4-5 times hotter than the surface of the sun potentially.

Yup.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not my job to disprove his claims, he has to prove them. that's how debates work.

And Come To Think Of It Guys Here Have Claimed That Hela Is Just Slightly Stronger Than Thor(debatable Once Again) And She Shattered Mjolnir Completly. If She Was Able To Do That And Thor Is Around Her Strength Range (arguable Once Again--i.E For And Against--) Then Thor Himself Should Be Strong Enough To Crack His Own Hammer. And If He Can Do That (he Should Be Able To Do That Going By What Guys Have Claimed About Hela) Then Zod Must Be Able To Atleast Crack The Hammer And If He Can He's Certainly Able To Take On Hela (and We've Not Started To Factor In Speed). Hela Is Also Outside Asgard Which Should Mean Her H/f Is Not That Deadpool-esque.

His claim, his burden.

Originally posted by Silent Master
You not being smart enough to quantify something doesn't mean it's unquantifiable.

As it stands by feats, Zod is weaker.

If you believe it is quantifiable then quantify it.

Originally posted by h1a8
If you believe it is quantifiable then quantify it.

Your claim, your burden.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Your claim, your burden.

You claimed that it was quantifiable. You must prove it.

Originally posted by h1a8
You claimed that it was quantifiable. You must prove it.

I said that in response to your claim. So again. your claim, your burden.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I said that in response to your claim. So again. your claim, your burden.

So you don't want to prove that her feat is quantifiable. Good to know.
Maybe because you cannot.
As it stands the feat is still unquantifiable unless someone can prove the minimum required force necessary to achieve the feat.

P.S. a person doesn't have to prove a negative. It's up to another to show that the negative is false.

IOW, you're trying to deflect attention away from the fact that you can't back up your claim.

Originally posted by h1a8
So you don't want to prove that her feat is quantifiable. Good to know.
Maybe because you cannot.
As it stands the feat is still unquantifiable unless someone can prove the minimum required force necessary to achieve the feat.

P.S. a person doesn't have to prove a negative. It's up to another to show that the negative is false.

Originally posted by Silent Master
IOW, you're trying to deflect attention away from the fact that you can't back up your claim.

So you can't prove the minimum force needed to achieve the feat therefore you have no leg to stand on in stating that Hela is stronger