Hela vs. General Zod

I see that you're still trying to deflect attention away from the fact that you can't back up your claim.

Originally posted by Silent Master
I see that you're still trying to deflect attention away from the fact that you can't back up your claim.

Originally posted by h1a8
You can't quantify the feat and therefore have no leg to stand on in proving that she is stronger.

Just like you can't quantify any of Zod's feats and therefore have no leg to stand on in proving that he is stronger.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like you can't quantify any of Zod's feats and therefore have no leg to stand on in proving that he is stronger.

Nuh uh burden on you no tagbacks

Best way to debate imho

Originally posted by Silent Master
Just like you can't quantify any of Zod's feats and therefore have no leg to stand on in proving that he is stronger.

Zod's feat can be quantified for a lower bound.

Originally posted by h1a8
Zod's feat can be quantified for a lower bound.

Not without guessing and if guessing is allowed then so can the Mjolnir feat.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Not without guessing and if guessing is allowed then so can the Mjolnir feat.

Originally posted by h1a8
Without guessing

Go ahead then, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Go ahead then, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

In other words, use measurements that are clearly LESS than the actual amount.

For example, if the skyscraper is more than 300 m tall then using 250m gives a valid under estimate.

Originally posted by h1a8
I stated to give a lower bound to his feat.

In other words, use measurements that are clearly LESS than the actual amount.

For example, if the skyscraper is more than 300 m tall then using 250m gives a valid under estimate.

Again, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

Does that mean you agree or that you disagree and this ignored what I said?

Again, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once and I'll admit you were right about everything.

I take that to mean you disagree with the lower bound way to quantify something. No need of wasting my time.

If you can quantify any of his strength feats without guessing even once, I'll admit you were right about everything.

As it stands Zod is stronger as Zods uppercut feat is superior to all quantifiable feats by Hela.

Originally posted by h1a8
I stated to give a lower bound to his feat.

In other words, use measurements that are clearly LESS than the actual amount.

For example, if the skyscraper is more than 300 m tall then using 250m gives a valid under estimate.

So what? IIRC, Superman was flying/levitating when Zod punched him up that skyscraper, which means he was already cancelling the effect of gravity on his own mass which means punching him across said distance is not as impressive as you make it sound.

Originally posted by FrothByte
So what? IIRC, Superman was flying/levitating when Zod punched him up that skyscraper, which means he was already cancelling the effect of gravity on his own mass which means punching him across said distance is not as impressive as you make it sound.

Anyway Clark was grounded when Zod hit him.

Originally posted by h1a8
Hypocritical. You guys have a problem when you say I'm lowballing Thor. Look what you are doing here. If Thor did that you wouldn't have mentioned this.

Anyway Clark was grounded when Zod hit him.

No, I'm only doing this to show you how idiotic your "unquantifiable" arguments are. Because using your logic, that uppercut is also unquantifiable since Clark is capable of negating gravity.

Originally posted by h1a8
As it stands Zod is stronger as Zods uppercut feat is superior to all quantifiable feats by Hela.

Zod's uppercut feat is just as unquantifiable as Hela feats. stop being a hypocrite.