Thanos vs. Nam-Ek

Originally posted by h1a8
You were the one attempting to quantify the feat by suggesting Mjolnir is at least as hard as tungsten. Then you added that she did it with one hand, etc.

we both know that it's far more durable than tungsten, stop being a troll.

Originally posted by Silent Master
we both know that it's far more durable than tungsten, stop being a troll.

Do we? And by how much?

Originally posted by h1a8
Do we? And by how much?

OK, let's BZ it.

That wouldn't prove how much more durable? How much more durable is Mjolnir than tungsten in compressive strength?

I bet you that I can prove it's at least 100x more durable in a BZ. do you agree to a BZ?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I bet you that I can prove it's at least 100x more durable in a BZ. do you agree to a BZ?

So you can prove that Mjolnir is at least 100x stronger than tungsten in COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH?

Do you agree to the Battle Zone?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you agree to the Battle Zone?

What will I be arguing in the Battlezone?

I have no stance.

BZ is not appropriate here.

Just post the proof.

It's a simple yes or no question, do you accept the battlezone?

Originally posted by h1a8
What will I be arguing in the Battlezone?

I have no stance.

BZ is not appropriate here.

Just post the proof.

Originally posted by h1a8
What will I be arguing in the Battlezone?

I have no stance.

BZ is not appropriate here.

Just post the proof.

Laughable.

Maybe you’ll become Bullseye very soon.

Originally posted by Silent Master
It's a simple yes or no question, do you accept the battlezone?

Originally posted by h1a8
Idiot response. I just asked you what will I be arguing in this BZ?
Stop being stupid and answer the question.

The battlezone is about whether or not Mjolnir is at least a hundred times more durable than tungsten.

Now, do you accept the battlezone?

Originally posted by h1a8
Idiot response. I just asked you what will I be arguing in this BZ?
Stop being stupid and answer the question.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The battlezone is about whether or not Mjolnir is at least a hundred times more durable than tungsten.

Now, do you accept the battlezone?

Yes or no, do you accept the BZ? if you answer with anything other than a yes or a no. I'll take that as an attempt to avoid a BZ, thus a "no".

Look everyone. Silent is trolling the thread. He claims that Mjolnir is at least 100x more (random number) durable than tungsten in compressive strength.
Yet he won't post the proof without someone Battlezoning him about it. But here's the kicker, no one is claiming otherwise (as it's a negative).
So basically he wants someone to say " no it isn't" in the Battlezone while he posts proof.

I claimed I could prove it in a BZ, you're the one that's refusing to BZ.

So either you don't disagree with my stance or you do disagree but know that I'd win the BZ. which is it?

Originally posted by Silent Master
I claimed I could prove it in a BZ, you're the one that's refusing to BZ.

So either you don't disagree with my stance or you do disagree but know that I'd win the BZ. which is it?

A BZ is a versus debate. There are two opposing stances supported by evidence.
You claim that you can prove something. That's your stance.
I have no stance on whether you can prove something. If you disagree then
What will be my stance?

If you have no stance, that means you don't disagree with me. thus there is no need for me to post anything.