Tucker's wife/kids targeted

Started by dadudemon22 pages
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm asking if we're making all shooting politically motivated, even when there's no clear indication?

That doesn't make sense. When did I start talking about that at all in my posts?

Originally posted by dadudemon
So whose sock is RealistRacism? He seems kurkish sometimes.
I suspect Kurk to be honest.

Originally posted by dadudemon
So whose sock is RealistRacism? He seems kurkish sometimes.

'RealityWarper', but I'm sure he's had more than that/this accounts.

Originally posted by dadudemon
That doesn't make sense. When did I start talking about that at all in my posts?
You didn't and it doesn't make sense it's a Surtur deviation. Leading to casual racism and bigotry.

Originally posted by Robtard
I was exaggerating to mock. I'm sure you've heard it said more than once "The Left is more dangerous than the Right!" in here.

Well I suppose the accuracy of that statement would depend on how one were to define "dangerous". It's inarguable that American right wing fringe groups are more deadly, but I'm pretty sure a case could be made that American left wing fringe groups are more dangerous based on the frequency of their activity.

I had a racist comment made at me recently, my girlfriend who is black said I was proof you didn't just get BBC, suffice to say, I took her to task over this.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
casual racism and bigotry.

You're such a little b!tch, lmao.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
my girlfriend who is black

😆

Look at all the pretend outrage from conservatives. Allow me to simplify this for you:

Does Party A have the right to insult Party B? Yes.

Does Party B feeling insulted justify his assaulting Party A? No.

Does the right of Party A to insult Party B somehow protect him from assault? No.

The only thing preventing Party B from assaulting Party A is his own self-regulation.

In this instance, Party A is trying to exploit the principles of Party B, and in so doing made a tactical mistake: He believed that Party B would always honor the speech rights of Party A to his own detriment, and that is simply not the case. Everyone has his limit, and when Party B reaches his, his consideration for Party A goes out the window.

No one is condoning violence, they are only stating that sometimes if you mess with the bull, you get the horns—right, wrong, or indifferent.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
"Whoooosh!" here comes snowflake the dragon
crylaugh

Originally posted by Robtard
'RealityWarper', but I'm sure he's had more than that/this accounts.

Are you certain?

There's a test for that: Ask his opinion on Superman vs anybody. He was more biased then Carver.

I think he also pushed Sentry beating Molecule Man, to mean he has infinite power..

Yes. Also, who cares, he's just a lazy troll trying with the lazy shock tactics.

Anyhow, whatever happened to Tucker's house being attacked? Was it legit? Who was it? Anyone caught? I've not followed up, mostly because it's so meh. But still, topic.

I'm only on the SW forums, and I'm not Kurk lmfao. Rob calls me a troll so he can get away with not answering basic questions 👆

Caught up on all the replies.

So RealistRacism is a sock but not Kurk and he's legit racist, not a parody of the right like I thought?

And we all acknowledge that black people in America face hardships and shitty outcomes that need to be addressed (in ways other than "throw money at the black people so we can feel better about ourselves"😉.

And Carlson may or may not be false-flagging himself to get sympathy. I am still on the fence about him. I don't know if he's legit been attacked. Surely he has video cameras on his home. FFS, I have them.

Originally posted by RealistRacism
I'm only on the SW forums, and I'm not Kurk lmfao. Rob calls me a troll so he can get away with not answering basic questions 👆
Another Star Wars kidtroll to ignore. He so needs an orgasm.

Originally posted by Putinbot1
Another Star Wars kidtroll to ignore.

The list is getting so long.

It's getting so hard to remember who to ignore! cry

Originally posted by dadudemon
The list is getting so long.

It's getting so hard to remember who to ignore! cry

imagine what its like for me with my Alzheimers.

I'm a racist for pointing out gangs aren't (probably "weren't" is the right word now) as prevalent in Europe, and that it's a black problem? And it's okay to kill whitey because 'muh hardships'?

Wait, so Tucker’s home attack might have been staged after all? Say it ain’t do, Cult of Trump.

Originally posted by RealistRacism
I'm a racist for pointing out gangs aren't (probably "weren't" is the right word now) as prevalent in Europe, and that it's a black problem? And it's okay to kill whitey because 'muh hardships'?
You truly are a hopeless troll kid.