Do you think SJWs are a legitimate problem?

Started by dadudemon13 pages

Originally posted by shiv
why?

well the kid is gonna need a miracle to grow up free from harm

"His mother came to pick up the boys to take them to [his brother’s] soccer game," recalled Sarah Scott, a family friend and mother of three sons who are close with the boy. "[He] hugged his dad and said, 'Love you.' He refused to go to the soccer game as a girl with mom and stayed with dad. That evening they came to our house."

The boy was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist the mother, a pediatrician, chose for her son to see.

According to the therapist's notes, the boy chose to identify as a girl when he was in sessions alone with his mother; alternatively, he chose to identify as a boy when he was in sessions alone with his father. The Federalist reports:

A dossier filed with the Dallas court says that, under the skilled eyes of the therapist, the child was presented two pieces of paper, one with the word “James” and one with the word “Luna,” and asked to pick the name he preferred. When the appointment only included his mother, James selected Luna, the name and gender he uses at his mother’s home and in his first-grade classroom. When the appointment was only with his father, however, James pointed to the boy name James, not the girl name.

... Legally ... (the father) ... has to offer both girls' and boys' outfits ...

... According to the father... The boy consistently refuses to wear dresses ...

Needless to say, the gender dysphoria diagnosis is being contested by the boy's dad.

[b]Walt Heyer, author of Trans Life Survivors and former transgender female, warns that the potential diagnosis could ruin the boy's life, similarly to what he went through after he was secretly cross-dressed by this grandmother for two-and-a-half years as a young boy.

"The diagnosis is critical, because labeling a child with gender dysphoria can trigger a series of physical and mental consequences for the child and has legal ramifications in the ongoing custody case. Get it wrong," Heyer writes at The Federalist, the boy's "life is irrevocably harmed."

The boy's "precious young life hinges purely on the diagnosis of gender dysphoria by a therapist who wraps herself in rainbow colors, affirms the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, and dismisses evidence to the contrary," argues Heyer. "Remove the 'rainbow' from [the] diagnosis, and it crumbles under the weight of the criteria for the diagnosis of gender dysphoria."

The author warned, "If we do not save [the boy] from a misdiagnosis, his next step is chemical castration at age eight, only two years away."

The family fighting to save the boy from the potential misdiagnosis have set up a website called "Save James."

-------------------------------------------------

I can confirm

1. I read surt's post

2. I read it and took it seriously

END [/B]

Sounds like the boy is being sexually abused by the mother. Sexual abuse can come in many forms and I believe this is one of them.

She Is An Experienced Practising Medical Doctor

Specialty: Children: Childhood Illness & Disease

And She's Gone Rogue

[Full On Dr Frankenstein Mode on The Boy]

Okay holy ****. I don't get seriously "triggered" by most of these stories. Sometimes irate, sometimes amused, sometimes angry.

This is legitimately disturbing me though. What the actual flying **** is going on in my state? I thought Texas would be more safe from this shit, but apparently chemically castrating an 8 year old is a good idea according to these lunatics.

It is Stories like THIS that Prove the Point of this Thread. Yes. SJW's ARE a Serious Threat!!!

Originally posted by dadudemon
I read some and I like his most of his posts. I also like some of his thoughts.

Only when you and Surtur are wasting space on KMC with your arguments and insults do I not read his posts. 😐

It's why I stopped responding to him, but he can't seem to stop responding to me.

Originally posted by dadudemon
I wish the judge would deny all rights to the mother with a ruling that states, "WTF is wrong with you?"

IMO whoever ruled he could not legally discuss it with the kid from a scientific point of view should be removed. That's utter insanity.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
Okay holy ****. I don't get seriously "triggered" by most of these stories. Sometimes irate, sometimes amused, sometimes angry.

This is legitimately disturbing me though. What the actual flying **** is going on in my state? I thought Texas would be more safe from this shit, but apparently chemically castrating an 8 year old is a good idea according to these lunatics.

I find it absurd that a court, let alone a doctor would go through medically castrating an eight year old boy? Honestly, sounds like fake news, or a shitty story fluffed up to appear even shittier because Far Right news outlets know that works well with click-baiting idiots.

Originally posted by Robtard
I find it absurd that a court, let alone a doctor would go through medically castrating an eight year old boy? Honestly, sounds like fake news, or a shitty story fluffed up to appear even shittier because Far Right news outlets know that works well with click-baiting idiots.

It comes from The Federalist. Which, in case you're curious, has a factual reporting rating of "high" from that site you love to use.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-federalist/

Now I'm guessing you'll try to spin this, ignore the factual reporting rating, and cling to the fact it says the site is bias for conservatives.

Far Right news is far right news though. I'd like to see actual proof on the medical castration of children part, that seems really far fetched.

It seems more like the authors opinion, an appeal to emotion.

Originally posted by Robtard
Far Right news is far right news though. I'd like to see actual proof on the medical castration of children part, that seems really far fetched.

Yes and it's no better or worse than places that lean left.

Do not cite the site again in the future if you're going to dismiss it's factual reporting claims when convenient.

And all Other News Outlets are pretty much Extreme Far Left so there is even Less Chance of getting any actual True News out of them Either.

Originally posted by Surtur
Yes and it's no better or worse than places that lean left.

Do not cite the site again in the future if you're going to dismiss it's factual reporting claims when convenient.

So no, you can't show that "eight year old will be chemically castrated!" part to be true.

Tiny bit of digging, the author who gave that opinion is Walt Heyer, a "former" transgender who is upset over his life choices. Looks like he's trying to scare people, tapping into emotions.

The author warned, "If we do not save [the boy] from a misdiagnosis, his next step is chemical castration at age eight, only two years away." -snip

IMO the most important thing would be the factual reporting rating since no outlet is gonna be neutral. If we're now going to dismiss those ratings there is little point in using the site.

Originally posted by Robtard
So no, you can't show that "eight year old will be chemically castrated!" part to be true.

Tiny bit of digging, the author who gave that opinion is Walt Heyer, a "former" transgender who is upset over his life choices. Looks like he's trying to scare people, tapping into emotions.

The author warned, "If we do not save [the boy] from a misdiagnosis, his next step is chemical castration at age eight, only two years away." -snip

I'm not gonna pour over all the stuff from the court files kiddo. You can question the article if you want, just keep this in mind next time you ever try to use that media site in the future.

Baseless claim about trying to scare people. It doesn't mean the article is a lie. And can you explain why, if the court is gonna do this, people should not be scared?

Oh my, Walt Heyer is an independent writer and doesn't work for the Far-Right Federalist, seems you didn't do any research.

I didn't comment on the whole article being false, I clearly noted the part about 'eight year olds being chemically castrated', you silly clown. Now do more flips.

So is anything right-wing far right?

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my, Walt Heyer is an independent writer and doesn't work for the Far-Right Federalist, seems you didn't do any research.

I didn't comment on the whole article being false, I clearly noted the part about 'eight year olds being chemically castrated', you silly clown. Now do more flips.

Lol uh none of what you're saying is showing anything said in the article is false.

And media outlets routinely have people who don't normally work for them write articles for them.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
So is anything right-wing far right?

Obviously not.

But it does seem like you fell for fake news via appeal to emotion, not the whole story, the chemical castrating of children part specifically.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
So is anything right-wing far right?

Wanna hear something truly funny? He called The Daily Wire alt right lol. Yet here he is commenting on the intelligence of others.

Originally posted by Surtur
Lol uh none of what you're saying is showing anything said in the article is false.

And media outlets routinely have people who don't normally work for them write articles for them.

If you want to believe an eight year old is going to be chemically castrated without proof shown, you go on right ahead, sporto.

Originally posted by Robtard
Obviously not.

But it does seem like you fell for fake news via appeal to emotion, not the whole story, the chemical castrating of children part specifically.

There is nothing to suggest he made up that hormonal therapy could potentially be used by age 8 in order to appeal to emotions lol. Nothing.