Do you think SJWs are a legitimate problem?

Two words: feminist snowplowing.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cMYfxOFBBM

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Please note that the question isn't whether SJWs are a bigger problem than <insert comparative group>, whether they've ever raised good points, or what the motives of the people who complain about them are. Do you think that the "Tumblr feminist" stereotype is one that exists in non-trivial numbers/power?

Yes, they are legit problems. They are driving the polarization in America. They are addicted to virtue signaling, tantrums, and though policing. I'm hoping this trend dies out. From what I'm seeing of the Gen Z folks, they are shitting all over SJW ideals. I love it. They work hard like the Greatest Generation, too. I love it.

It's because they grew up with the SJW millennials but also were old enough during the housing market crash and Great Recession to know that hard work and less whining is more important that 70 genders.

sjws have a set of dogma that they will never question no matter what arguments they hear

they're leftist fundies

100 genders or gtfo.

People in their early-mid 20's now? Lolz.

Originally posted by dadudemon
Yes, they are legit problems. They are driving the polarization in America. They are addicted to virtue signaling, tantrums, and though policing. I'm hoping this trend dies out. From what I'm seeing of the Gen Z folks, they are shitting all over SJW ideals. I love it. They work hard like the Greatest Generation, too. I love it.

It's because they grew up with the SJW millennials but also were old enough during the housing market crash and Great Recession to know that hard work and less whining is more important that 70 genders.

My point is to make 'em feel loved and worthwhile. Then they'll shut the f*ck up and get back to the mines.

james damore: maybe men and women are different, let's have a discussion?

sjws: OMG RACIST MISOGYNIST FIRE FIRE RUIN YOUR LIFE DOXX DOXX DOXX

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
What if hard work isn't rewarded proportionally? Like they feel that your endless effort means nothing to those that demand it? You turn attention to things that don't matter when you feel dispossessed. Like religion, sports, identity politics, several dozen genders, etc.

My point is to make 'em feel loved and worthwhile. Then they'll shut the f*ck up and get back to the mines.

Canada did it right, they legalized weed and everyone felt so much love 3 days later Canada ran out! (It might not have been 3 days but very shortly after it was legalized.) But for 3 days no one could complain!

Originally posted by Lord Lucien
My point is to make 'em feel loved and worthwhile. Then they'll shut the f*ck up and get back to the mines.

You cannot make someone feel loved or worthwhile. Those feelings come from within, my son. It's part of growing up and being emotionally healthy. This is what is fundamentally wrong with SJWs.

lots of sjws have mental illnesses that they never would've survived 100 years ago

No, validation comes from without. I am nothing without the praise and kudos my peers in the jeering mob lavish upon me for agreeing with them. Nothing.

Originally posted by dadudemon
You cannot make someone feel loved or worthwhile. Those feelings come from within, my son. It's part of growing up and being emotionally healthy. This is what is fundamentally wrong with SJWs.

This post made me so angry and sad at the same time I had to type this reply out in a closet wearing a black mask. You can't tell me that someone else can make me feel a certain way, fascist.

PS I have a bike lock on me.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Please note that the question isn't whether SJWs are a bigger problem than <insert comparative group>, whether they've ever raised good points, or what the motives of the people who complain about them are. Do you think that the "Tumblr feminist" stereotype is one that exists in non-trivial numbers/power?

No. They are loud, but not numerous, and do not have the power or support to do anything but scream into the void. That is why it is stupid for people to be so fixated on them.

SJW’s will always be there. It’s a political phase that lasts a year or two, then they grow up. So no, they aren’t really a problem.

Pretty well. The SJWs today that are ruining society were preceded by the hippies. Those f*cking hippies literally destroyed Western civilization. They're the reason that society fell. SJWs are also literally destroying Western civilization.

It's all a phase of societal destruction. It won't last.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Please note that the question isn't whether SJWs are a bigger problem than <insert comparative group>, whether they've ever raised good points, or what the motives of the people who complain about them are. Do you think that the "Tumblr feminist" stereotype is one that exists in non-trivial numbers/power?

Originally posted by dadudemon
You cannot make someone feel loved or worthwhile. Those feelings come from within, my son. It's part of growing up and being emotionally healthy. This is what is fundamentally wrong with SJWs.

Also I think people who got participation trophies handed out to them don't need to be coddled any further.

When campuses become daycares there is a problem. I'm waiting for a petition for nap time to be reintroduced.

the problem is when a worthy cause is used as a smear.
for examples social justice warrior and virtue signaling.

that's why i'm fine with the "NPC" name-calling for the simple fact that it does not attack concepts which society requires to keep from crumbling.

Also again: screaming into the void got us feminist snow plowing.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/gender-equal-snow-removal-procedures-left-stockholm-paralyzed

If you want an example in America, SJW's are why Title IX investigations in colleges were dicking so many people over lol. The SJW's created that atmosphere. To say they do no harm is false. Ask the kids who lost scholarships cuz of mere accusations and had to leave their schools.

So no, we won't say it does no harm. You can try to argue the harm it does is minimal, but nope: we won't be saying it does no harm.