Do you think SJWs are a legitimate problem?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
the problem is when a worthy cause is used as a smear.
for examples social justice warrior and virtue signaling.

that's why i'm fine with the "NPC" name-calling for the simple fact that it does not attack concepts which society requires to keep from crumbling.

These phrases have very specific meanings that any adult should be capable of understanding. There is a problem if you feel calling someone a SJW merely means one is saying "you are pro social justice". Cuz it means your brain can't grasp concepts that should not be difficult. How is it you can grasp concepts like "toxic masculinity" though? Weird.

Also while you have no problem with the phrase "NPC" some of your fellow NPC's do.

Originally posted by The Ellimist
Please note that the question isn't whether SJWs are a bigger problem than <insert comparative group>, whether they've ever raised good points, or what the motives of the people who complain about them are. Do you think that the "Tumblr feminist" stereotype is one that exists in non-trivial numbers/power?

No.

SJW's are annoying, but harmless.

The people who use social issues to further an agenda (See Frame Game Radio for some examples. The Starbucks "controversy", where a leader of "Power", an activist group with billion dollar lawsuits against a variety of companies, was caught hugging one of the "victims", is one such example), they're the real problem.

A reporter who was caught saying "Just call one of them a racist. Doesn't matter who. Then they'll bluster defending themselves" is the problem.

In other words, anyone who uses a social issue as a tactic for political or personal gain is the problem.

That is not what most SJW's do. SJW's are just people trying to win arguments, or people arguing well intentioned beliefs, the same as anyone else online.

Originally posted by cdtm
No.

SJW's are annoying, but harmless.

The people who use social issues to further an agenda (See Frame Game Radio for some examples. The Starbucks "controversy", where a leader of "Power", an activist group with billion dollar lawsuits against a variety of companies, was caught hugging one of the "victims", is one such example), they're the real problem.

A reporter who was caught saying "Just call one of them a racist. Doesn't matter who. Then they'll bluster defending themselves" is the problem.

In other words, anyone who uses a social issue as a tactic for political or personal gain is the problem.

That is not what most SJW's do. SJW's are just people trying to win arguments, or people arguing well intentioned beliefs, the same as anyone else online.

It really now seems like you have a different meaning, since "people who use a social issue as a tactic for political or personal gain" is how I'd describe SJW's lol.

You describe their tactic of "just call them racist" quite perfectly. It's what they do.

"People just trying to win arguments" just sound like a type of troll.

Originally posted by Surtur
These phrases have very specific meanings that any adult should be capable of understanding. There is a problem if you feel calling someone a SJW merely means one is saying "you are pro social justice". Cuz it means your brain can't grasp concepts that should not be difficult. How is it you can grasp concepts like "toxic masculinity" though? Weird.

said the simple minded bitter incel who couldn't grasp my point 👆

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
said the simple minded bitter incel who couldn't grasp my point 👆

just wouldn't be a proper GDF thread without another crybaby party

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
just wouldn't be a proper GDF thread without another crybaby party

Don't forget to add the name calling. The Immature Name Calling...always gotta have that.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Don't forget to add the name calling. The Immature Name Calling...always gotta have that. [/B]

Can always rely on the certain posters for the same old party favors.

I don't think so.

Now, SJW Extremists are a problem.

There's a difference between SJW Extremists and SJW.

There's nothing wrong with being offended by the word "Retard" or "******" when used to describe a specific person or TYPE of person's. But demanding that everyone should never use the word outright is just stupid, it's going to continue happening regardless of what is said or done.

Not according to NBC.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
said the simple minded bitter incel who couldn't grasp my point 👆

Originally posted by Putinbot1
waits for other far right sympathisers and apologists to white knight Surtur.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
just wouldn't be a proper GDF thread without another crybaby party

Oh the irony...

^
^more incel tears

^
^more Lefty Loonacy.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^
^more incel tears

You seem upset, what's wrong my little NPC?

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
^
^more incel tears

there there, let it out

Sounds like Bashy is really wanting a Surt Hug.

NO BASH, NO NPC, NO LEFTIST KMC!

HEY HEY, HO HO, BASHAR TEG HAS GOT TO GO!

WE KNOW WHERE YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT!

EMP is backing a losing side.